Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of Current Evidence for Apoptosis After Spinal Cord Injury

BEATTIE, MICHAEL S., FAROOQUI, AKHLAQ A., BRESNAHAN, JACQUELINE C.·2000·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

The initial mechanical tissue disruption of spinal cord injury (SCI) is followed by a period of secondary injury that increases the size of the lesion. The secondary injury has long been thought to be due to the continuation of cellular destruction through necrotic (or passive) cell death. Recent evidence from brain injury and ischemia suggested that cellular apoptosis, an active form of programmed cell death seen during development, could play a role in CNS injury in adulthood. Here, we review the evidence that apoptosis may be important in the pathophysiology of SCI. There is now strong morphological and biochemical evidence from a number of laboratories demonstrating the presence of apoptosis after SCI. Apoptosis occurs in populations of neurons, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and, perhaps, astrocytes. The death of oligodendrocytes in white matter tracts continues for many weeks after injury and may contribute to post-injury demyelination. The mediators of apoptosis after SCI are not well understood, but there is a close relationship between microglia and dying oligodendrocytes, suggesting that microglial activation may be involved. There is also evidence for the activation of important intracellular pathways known to be involved in apoptosis in other cells and systems. For example, some members of the caspase family of cysteine proteases are activated after SCI. It appears that the evolution of the lesion after SCI involves both necrosis and apoptosis. It is likely that better understanding of apoptosis after SCI will lead to novel strategies for therapeutic interventions that can diminish secondary injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2000.17.915

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
BEATTIE, M. S., FAROOQUI, A. A., & BRESNAHAN, J. C.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2000-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
915-925
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W2076731990
Cited by
521
References
62
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Current Evidence for Apoptosis After Spinal Cord Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2000.17.915
The paper
BEATTIE, M. S., FAROOQUI, A. A., & BRESNAHAN, J. C. (2000). Review of Current Evidence for Apoptosis After Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2000.17.915

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.