Graded Histological and Locomotor Outcomes after Spinal Cord Contusion Using the NYU Weight-Drop Device versus Transection
Abstract
Injury reproducibility is an important characteristic of experimental models of spinal cord injuries (SCI) because it limits the variability in locomotor and anatomical outcome measures. Recently, a more sensitive locomotor rating scale, the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale (BBB), was developed but had not been tested on rats with severe SCI complete transection. Rats had a 10-g rod dropped from heights of 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 mm onto the exposed cord at Tl 0 using the NYU device. A subset of rats with 25 and 50 mm SCI had subsequent spinal cord transection (SCI + TX) and were compared to rats with transection only (TX) in order to ascertain the dependence of recovery on descending systems. After 7-9 weeks of locomotor testing, the percentage of white matter measured from myelin-stained cross sections through the lesion center was significantly different between all the groups with the exception of 12.5 vs 25 mm and 25 vs 50 mm groups. Locomotor recovery was greatest for the 6.25-mm group and least for the 50-mm group and was correlated positively to the amount of tissue sparing at the lesion center (p 0.05). Thus, spared descending systems appear to modify segmental systems which produce greater behavioral improvements than isolated cord systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
White matter sparing directly correlates with hindlimb motor recovery.
“White matter sparing directly correlates with hindlimb motor recovery [71]; therefore, since locomotion was not changed by tamoxifen, it is not surprising that total spared white matter was also unaffected by tamoxifen.”
From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapter 4 Cell death in models of spinal cord injury
Beattie, M. S., Hermann, G. E., Rogers, R. C., & Bresnahan, J. C. (2002) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(02)37006-7 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Self-citationAsboth, L., Friedli, L., Beauparlant, J., Martinez-Gonzalez, C., Anil, S., Rey, E., Baud, L., Pidpruzhnykova, G., Anderson, M. A., Shkorbatova, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0093-5 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Temporal–Spatial Pattern of Acute Neuronal and Glial Loss after Spinal Cord Contusion
Grossman, S. D., Rosenberg, L. J., & Wrathall, J. R. (2001) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1006/exnr.2001.7628 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Light-Induced Rescue of Breathing after Spinal Cord Injury
Alilain, W. J., Li, X., Horn, K. P., Dhingra, R., Dick, T. E., Herlitze, S., & Silver, J. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3378-08.2008 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Features of skin-coincubated macrophages that promote recovery from spinal cord injury
Bomstein, Y., Marder, J. B., Vitner, K., Smirnov, I., Lisaey, G., Butovsky, O., Fulga, V., & Yoles, E. (2003) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00260-1 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Rabchevsky, A. G., Sullivan, P. G., Fugaccia, I., & Scheff, S. W. (2003) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/089771503322144572 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Macrophages and microglia in central nervous system injury: are they helpful or harmful?
Schwartz, M. (2003) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200304000-00001 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Protective effects of oral creatine supplementation on spinal cord injury in rats
Hausmann, O., Fouad, K., Wallimann, T., & Schwab, M. (2002) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101330 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Colón, J. M., Torrado, A. I., Cajigas, Á., Santiago, J. M., Salgado, I. K., Arroyo, Y., & Miranda, J. D. (2016) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4111 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Pukos, N., & McTigue, D. M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235232 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S., & Bresnahan, J. C.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-256
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975724680
- Cited by
- 1,470
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 77
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS32000, R01NS032000)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Keywords
- spinal cord contusion, spinal cord transection, locomotor recovery, white matter sparing, rat model of spinal cord injury, hindlimb movement
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Contusions, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Histocytochemistry, Locomotion, Male, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review