Cited by 1,470Spinal Cord Injury ResearchVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyNerve injury and regeneration

Graded Histological and Locomotor Outcomes after Spinal Cord Contusion Using the NYU Weight-Drop Device versus Transection

Basso, D.Michele, Beattie, Michael S., Bresnahan, Jacqueline C.·1996·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Injury reproducibility is an important characteristic of experimental models of spinal cord injuries (SCI) because it limits the variability in locomotor and anatomical outcome measures. Recently, a more sensitive locomotor rating scale, the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale (BBB), was developed but had not been tested on rats with severe SCI complete transection. Rats had a 10-g rod dropped from heights of 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 mm onto the exposed cord at Tl 0 using the NYU device. A subset of rats with 25 and 50 mm SCI had subsequent spinal cord transection (SCI + TX) and were compared to rats with transection only (TX) in order to ascertain the dependence of recovery on descending systems. After 7-9 weeks of locomotor testing, the percentage of white matter measured from myelin-stained cross sections through the lesion center was significantly different between all the groups with the exception of 12.5 vs 25 mm and 25 vs 50 mm groups. Locomotor recovery was greatest for the 6.25-mm group and least for the 50-mm group and was correlated positively to the amount of tissue sparing at the lesion center (p 0.05). Thus, spared descending systems appear to modify segmental systems which produce greater behavioral improvements than isolated cord systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/exnr.1996.0098

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S., & Bresnahan, J. C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
244-256
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975724680
Cited by
1,470
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 77
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS32000, R01NS032000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
spinal cord contusion, spinal cord transection, locomotor recovery, white matter sparing, rat model of spinal cord injury, hindlimb movement
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Contusions, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Histocytochemistry, Locomotion, Male, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review