Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 631

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multivariable Prognostic Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from The IMPACT Study

Murray, Gordon D., Butcher, Isabella, McHugh, Gillian S., Lu, Juan, Mushkudiani, Nino A., Maas, Andrew I.R., Marmarou, Anthony, Steyerberg, Ewout W.·2007·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

We studied the prognostic value of a wide range of conventional and novel prognostic factors on admission after traumatic brain injury (TBI) using both univariate and multivariable analysis. The outcome measure was Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months after injury. Individual patient data were available on a cohort of 8686 patients drawn from eight randomized controlled trials and three observational studies. The most powerful independent prognostic variables were age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score, pupil response, and computerized tomography (CT) characteristics, including the Marshall CT classification and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Prothrombin time was also identified as a powerful independent prognostic factor, but it was only available for a limited number of patients coming from three of the relevant studies. Other important prognostic factors included hypotension, hypoxia, the eye and verbal components of the GCS, glucose, platelets, and hemoglobin. These results on prognostic factors will underpin future work on the IMPACT project, which is focused on the development of novel approaches to the design and analysis of clinical trials in TBI. In addition, the results provide pointers to future research, including further analysis of the prognostic value of prothrombin time, and the evaluation of the clinical impact of intervening aggressively to correct abnormalities in hemoglobin, glucose, and coagulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2006.0035

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 631

Metadata

Authors
Murray, G. D., Butcher, I., McHugh, G. S., Lu, J., Mushkudiani, N. A., Maas, A. I. R., Marmarou, A., & Steyerberg, E. W.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2007-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
329-337
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W2018867075
Cited by
631
References
3
FWCI
15.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multivariable Prognostic Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from The IMPACT Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2006.0035
The paper
Murray, G. D., Butcher, I., McHugh, G. S., Lu, J., Mushkudiani, N. A., Maas, A. I. R., Marmarou, A., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2007). Multivariable Prognostic Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from The IMPACT Study. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2006.0035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.