The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focal Lesions in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Outcome: CT versus 3T MRI
Abstract
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is associated with long-term cognitive deficits. This study compared the detection rate of acute post-traumatic focal lesions on computed tomography (CT) and 3T (Tesla) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with neurocognitive outcomes. Adults (n = 36; age range, 19-52 years) with a single episode of mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15, as well as loss of consciousness and post-traumatic amnesia) were prospectively enrolled and had CT within 24 h of injury and 3T MR within 2 weeks of injury. The CT and MR scans were reviewed by two neuroradiologists who were blinded to clinical information. Twenty-eight of these mTBI subjects and 18 matched healthy volunteers also underwent serial neurocognitive testing. Of the 36 mTBI cases, intraparenchymal lesions were detected in 18 CT and 27 acute MR exams, consisting of hemorrhagic traumatic axonal injury (TAI) (eight CT, 17 MR), non-hemorrhagic TAI (zero CT, four MR), and cerebral contusions (13 CT, 21 MR). Mild TBI patients had significantly worse performance on working memory tasks than matched controls at the acute time point (<2 weeks), and at 1 month and at 1 year post-injury; yet there was no significant correlation of imaging findings with working memory impairment. In conclusion, 3T MR detected parenchymal lesions in 75% of this mTBI cohort with loss of consciousness and post-traumatic amnesia, a much higher rate than CT. However, the CT and 3T MR imaging findings did not account for cognitive impairment, suggesting that newer imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging are needed to provide biomarkers for neurocognitive and functional outcome in mTBI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carroll, L., Cassidy, J. D., Peloso, P., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., & Pépin, M. (2004) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501960410023859 · Cited by 1,326
Cited by
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review
McInnes, K., Friesen, C. L., MacKenzie, D. E., Westwood, D. A., & Boe, S. G. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174847 · Cited by 531
Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: review and meta-analysis
Eierud, C., Craddock, R. C., Fletcher, S., Aulakh, M., King-Casas, B., Kuehl, D., & LaConte, S. M. (2014) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.12.009 · Cited by 524
Exploring new routes for neuroprotective drug development in traumatic brain injury
Janowitz, T., & Menon, D. K. (2010) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3000330 · Cited by 74
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis of Frontal Lobes in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury
Oni, M. B., Wilde, E. A., Bigler, E. D., McCauley, S. R., Wu, T. C., Yallampalli, R., Chu, Z., Li, X., Hunter, J. V., Vasquez, A. C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073809356034 · Cited by 73
Radiologic common data elements rates in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury
Mayer, A. R., Cohen, D. M., Wertz, C. J., Dodd, A. B., Shoemaker, J., Pluto, C., Zumberge, N. A., Park, G., Bangert, B. A., Lin, C., et al. (2020) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000008488 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, H., Wintermark, M., Gean, A. D., Ghajar, J., Manley, G. T., & Mukherjee, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1049-1056
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W1989079034
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focal Lesions in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Outcome: CT versus 3T MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2008.0566
- The paper
- Lee, H., Wintermark, M., Gean, A. D., Ghajar, J., Manley, G. T., & Mukherjee, P. (2008). Focal Lesions in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Outcome: CT versus 3T MRI. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008.0566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.