The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hemorrhagic Progression of a Contusion after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review
Open accessAbstract
The magnitude of damage to cerebral tissues following head trauma is determined by the primary injury, caused by the kinetic energy delivered at the time of impact, plus numerous secondary injury responses that almost inevitably worsen the primary injury. When head trauma results in a cerebral contusion, the hemorrhagic lesion often progresses during the first several hours after impact, either expanding or developing new, non-contiguous hemorrhagic lesions, a phenomenon termed hemorrhagic progression of a contusion (HPC). Because a hemorrhagic contusion marks tissues with essentially total unrecoverable loss of function, and because blood is one of the most toxic substances to which the brain can be exposed, HPC is one of the most severe types of secondary injury encountered following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Historically, HPC has been attributed to continued bleeding of microvessels fractured at the time of primary injury. This concept has given rise to the notion that continued bleeding might be due to overt or latent coagulopathy, prompting attempts to normalize coagulation with agents such as recombinant factor VIIa. Recently, a novel mechanism was postulated to account for HPC that involves delayed, progressive microvascular failure initiated by the impact. Here we review the topic of HPC, we examine data relevant to the concept of a coagulopathy, and we detail emerging data elucidating the mechanism of progressive microvascular failure that predisposes to HPC after head trauma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · doi:10.1097/00001199-199912000-00009 · Cited by 1,387
Oertel, M., Boscardin, W. J., Obrist, W. D., Glenn, T. C., McArthur, D. L., Gravori, T., Lee, J. H., & Martin, N. A. (2005) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2005.103.5.0812 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Biomarkers of traumatic injury are transported from brain to blood via the glymphatic system.
Plog, B. A., Dashnaw, M. L., Hitomi, E., Peng, W., Liao, Y., Lou, N., Deane, R., & Nedergaard, M. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3742-14.2015 · Cited by 525
Monteiro, M., Newcombe, V. F. J., Mathieu, F., Adatia, K., Kamnitsas, K., Ferrante, E., Das, T., Whitehouse, D., Rueckert, D., Menon, D. K., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30085-6 · Cited by 162
Walsh, M., Fritz, S., Hake, D., Son, M., Greve, S., Jbara, M., Chitta, S., Fritz, B., Miller, A., K Bader, M., et al. (2016) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1389450117666160310153211 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurland, D., Hong, C., Aarabi, B., Gerzanich, V., & Simard, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-31
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2101551122
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.