Cited by 56Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Longitudinal Developmental Outcomes after Traumatic Brain Injury in Young Children: Are Infants More Vulnerable Than Toddlers?

Open access
Keenan, Heather T., Presson, Angela P., Clark, Amy E., Cox, Charles S., Ewing-Cobbs, Linda·2019·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Children under 4 years of age have the highest incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among the non-elderly and may be at high risk of poor developmental outcomes. We prospectively enrolled a cohort of children injured before 31 months old with TBI or orthopedic injury (OI), from 2013 to 2015 at two pediatric level 1 trauma centers to study very young children's developmental outcomes after injury. We used Ages & Stages-3 and Ages & Stages: Social-Emotional screening tools to measure children's development at pre-injury and 3 and 12 months post-injury. The cohort included 123 children with TBI categorized as mild (n = 48), complicated-mild or moderate (n = 54), and severe (n = 21) and 45 children with OI. Generalized linear models examined effects of injury severity and age at injury controlling for pre-injury ratings. Children with mild or complicated-mild/moderate TBI generally remained on developmental track. Compared to OI, children with severe TBI tended to have a negative developmental trajectory with decrements in communication (-7.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.7, -0.48), gross motor (-15.2; 95% CI, -21.1, -9.19), problem solving (-11.6; 95% CI, -17.9, -5.29), personal-social (-16.8; 95% CI, -22.8, -10.8), and social-emotional (21.0; 95% CI, 7.32, 34.7) domains 12 months post-injury. Developmental effects from TBI differed by age at injury: Infants had more difficulties than older children in communication and problem-solving domains. Despite low development…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2018.5687

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies show that children with mild TBI and complicated mild TBI generally demonstrate few deficits in cognitive performance after three months post-injury, while children with severe TBI demonstrate consistently poorer cognitive performance compared to children with orthopedic injury.

    “Previous studies show that children with mild TBI and complicated mild TBI generally demonstrate few deficits in cognitive performance after three months post-injury, while children with sTBI demonstrate consistently poorer cognitive performance compared to children with OI (Babikian & Asarnow, 2009; Chadwick et al., 2021; Keenan et al., 2018).”
  • Because of the low number of patients with moderate TBI, children with complicated mild to moderate TBI were combined for analysis (n = 86), consistent with current approaches to analyzing cognitive recovery after TBI in children and adults.

    “Because of the low number of patients with moderate TBI, we combined children with complicated mild to moderate TBI (cmmTBI) for analysis (n = 86), consistent with current approaches to analyzing cognitive recovery after TBI in both children (Keenan et al., 2018; Keenan et al., 2019; Levin et al., 2008) and adults (Tulsky et al., 2017).”
  • Because of the low number of patients with moderate TBI, children with complicated mild to moderate TBI were combined for analysis (n = 86), consistent with current approaches to analyzing cognitive recovery after TBI in children and adults.

    “Because of the low number of patients with moderate TBI, we combined children with complicated mild to moderate TBI (cmmTBI) for analysis (n = 86), consistent with current approaches to analyzing cognitive recovery after TBI in both children (Keenan et al., 2018; Keenan et al., 2019; Levin et al., 2008) and adults (Tulsky et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keenan, H. T., Presson, A. P., Clark, A. E., Cox, C. S., & Ewing-Cobbs, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics and Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Corresponding author
Keenan, Heather T.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
282-292
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W2884466727
Cited by
56
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002538)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01CE002188)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K24HD072984)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, infants, toddlers, developmental outcomes, injury severity, age at injury, orthopedic trauma, communication, problem solving, social-emotional development, early childhood intervention, developmental vulnerability
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review