Cited by 201Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Prediction of cognitive sequelae based on abnormal computed tomography findings in children following mild traumatic brain injury

Levin, Harvey S., Hanten, Gerri, Roberson, Garland, Li, Xiaoqi, Ewing-Cobbs, Linda, Dennis, Maureen, Chapman, Sandra, Max, Jeffrey E. +4 more·2008·Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of intracranial pathophysiology on computed tomography (CT) scans obtained within 24 hours of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) in children adversely affects neuropsychological outcome during the 1st year postinjury. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal design was used to examine the neuropsychological outcomes in children (ages 5-15 years) who had been treated for MTBI, which was defined as a loss of consciousness for up to 30 minutes and a lowest Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15. Exclusion criteria included any preinjury neurological disorder. Outcome assessments were performed within 2 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. Outcomes were compared between patients with MTBI whose postinjury CT scans revealed complications of brain pathophysiology (32 patients, CMTBI group) and those with MTBI but without complications (48 patients, MTBI group). RESULTS: Significant interactions confirmed that the pattern of recovery over 12 months after injury differed depending on the intracranial pathology, presence and severity of injuries to body regions other than the head, preinjury attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and socioeconomic status. Children in the CMTBI group had significantly poorer episodic memory, slower cognitive processing, diminished recovery in managing cognitive interference, and poorer performance in calculating and reading than patients in the MTBI group. Among the patie…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/ped/2008/1/6/461

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggregating data for complicated mild TBI and moderate TBI is consistent with approaches used in previous research characterizing neurobehavioral recovery after TBI in both children and adults.

    “Aggregating data for complicated mild TBI and moderate TBI is consistent with approaches used in previous research characterizing neurobehavioral recovery after TBI in both children (Keenan et al., 2018, 2019; Levin et al., 2008) and adults (Tulsky et al., 2017).”
  • Because of the low number of patients with moderate TBI, children with complicated mild to moderate TBI were combined for analysis (n = 86), consistent with current approaches to analyzing cognitive recovery after TBI in children and adults.

    “Because of the low number of patients with moderate TBI, we combined children with complicated mild to moderate TBI (cmmTBI) for analysis (n = 86), consistent with current approaches to analyzing cognitive recovery after TBI in both children (Keenan et al., 2018; Keenan et al., 2019; Levin et al., 2008) and adults (Tulsky et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, H. S., Hanten, G., Roberson, G., Li, X., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M., Chapman, S., Max, J. E., Hunter, J., Schachar, R., Luerssen, T. G., & Swank, P.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
  • Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston;
  • Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health and
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Texas Children's Hospital (US)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Harvey S.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Published
2008-06
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
461-470
ISSN
  • 1933-0707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0715
OpenAlex
W1990055699
Cited by
201
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH01800, K08MH001800)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS021889)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, children, intracranial pathology, computed tomography findings, neuropsychological outcomes, cognitive sequelae, working memory, episodic memory, visuomotor speed, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, extracranial injuries, linear skull fracture, cognitive recovery, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Injuries, Child, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review