Cited by 21Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesChild Abuse and Trauma

Social interaction in young children with inflicted and accidental traumatic brain injury: relations with family resources and social outcomes

Open access
Ewing-Cobbs, Linda, Prasad, Mary R., Mendez, Donna, Barnes, Marcia A., Swank, Paul·2013·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Core social interaction behaviors were examined in young children 0-36 months of age who were hospitalized for accidental (n = 61) or inflicted (n = 64) traumatic brain injury (TBI) in comparison to typically developing children (n = 60). Responding to and initiating gaze and joint attention (JA) were evaluated during a semi-structured sequence of social interactions between the child and an examiner at 2 and 12 months after injury. The accidental TBI group established gaze less often and had an initial deficit initiating JA that resolved by the follow-up. Contrary to expectation, children with inflicted TBI did not have lower rates of social engagement than other groups. Responding to JA was more strongly related than initiating JA to measures of injury severity and to later cognitive and social outcomes. Compared to complicated-mild/moderate TBI, severe TBI in young children was associated with less responsiveness in social interactions and less favorable caregiver ratings of communication and social behavior. JA response, family resources, and group interacted to predict outcomes. Children with inflicted TBI who were less socially responsive and had lower levels of family resources had the least favorable outcomes. Low social responsiveness after TBI may be an early marker for later cognitive and adaptive behavior difficulties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617713000210

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two main findings-that TBI was associated with subsequent adverse adulthood outcomes, and the dose-response relationship with injury severity-are consistent with previous research.

    “Two main findings—that TBI was associated with subsequent adverse adulthood outcomes, and the dose-response relationship with injury severity—are consistent with previous research [17–20,44]”

    From Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in Childhood and Adolescence: A Nationwide Swedish Cohort Study of a Wide Range of Medical and Social Outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results (Relation of Social Interaction Scores with Injury Variables; page not provided) report worse communication and social scores after severe than after complicated-mild/moderate TBI, supporting the injury-severity portion. The outcomes were measured in young children at one-year follow-up, not in adulthood; the Discussion (Limitations and Future Directions; page not provided) calls for longer-term follow-up. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vygotsky L Mind in society 1978 Cambridge Harvard University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewing-Cobbs, L., Prasad, M. R., Mendez, D., Barnes, M. A., & Swank, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2013-03-18
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
497-507
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2139375097
Cited by
21
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS029462)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, young children, social interaction, joint attention, gaze, social responsiveness, family resources, injury severity, social outcomes, cognitive outcomes, adaptive behavior
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Brain Injuries, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Family, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Retrospective Studies, Statistics as Topic, Cohort Studies, Glasgow Coma Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review