Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Head Injury Treatment With Healthy and Advanced Dietary Supplements: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Branched Chain Amino Acids in the Treatment of Concussion in Adolescents and Young Adults

Corwin, Daniel J., Myers, Sage R., Arbogast, Kristy B., Lim, Miranda M., Elliott, Jonathan E., Metzger, Kristina B., LeRoux, Peter, Elkind, Jaclynn, Metheny, Hannah, Berg, Jeffrey, Pettijohn, Kevin, Master, Christina L., Kirschen, Matthew P., Cohen, Akiva S.·2024·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Concussion is a common injury in the adolescent and young adult populations. Although branched chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation has shown improvements in neurocognitive and sleep function in pre-clinical animal models of mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI), to date, no studies have been performed evaluating the efficacy of BCAAs in concussed adolescents and young adults. The goal of this pilot trial was to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of varied doses of oral BCAA supplementation in a group of concussed adolescents and young adults. The study was conducted as a pilot, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of participants ages 11–34 presenting with concussion to outpatient clinics (sports medicine and primary care), urgent care, and emergency departments of a tertiary care pediatric children's hospital and an urban tertiary care adult hospital, between June 24, 2014 and December 5, 2020. Participants were randomized to one of five study arms (placebo and 15 g, 30 g, 45 g, and 54 g BCAA treatment daily) and followed for 21 days after enrollment. Outcome measures included daily computerized neurocognitive tests (processing speed, the a priori primary outcome; and attention, visual learning, and working memory), symptom score, physical and cognitive activity, sleep/wake alterations, treatment compliance, and adverse events. In total, 42 participants were randomized, 38 of whom provided analyzable data. We found no difference in our primary outcome of processing speed between the arms; however, there was a significant reduction in total symptom score (decrease of 4.4 points on a 0–54 scale for every 500 g of study drug consumed, p value for trend = 0.0036, [uncorrected]) and return to physical activity (increase of 0.503 points on a 0–5 scale for every 500 g of study drug consumed, p value for trend = 0.005 [uncorrected]). There were no serious adverse events. Eight of 38 participants reported a mild (not interfering with daily activity) or moderate (limitation of daily activity) adverse event; there were no differences in adverse events by arm, with only two reported mild adverse events (both gastrointestinal) in the highest (45 g and 54 g) BCAA arms. Although limited by slow enrollment, small sample size, and missing data, this study provides the first demonstration of efficacy, as well as safety and tolerability, of BCAAs in concussed adolescents and young adults; specifically, a dose-response effect in reducing concussion symptoms and a return to baseline physical activity in those treated with higher total doses of BCAAs. These findings provide important preliminary data to inform a larger trial of BCAA therapy to expedite concussion recovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2023.0433

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1542/peds.2015-4635 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1542/peds.2010-2005 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4397 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00267-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.08.032 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000228 · DOI
  7. 10.1089/neu.2018.6290 · DOI
  8. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000505 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.3389/fneur.2015.00073 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007092 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/s00726-011-1202-x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.023 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.022 · DOI
  14. 10.1089/neu.2012.2491 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0883073809336295 · DOI
  16. 10.4088/jcp.v65n0116 · DOI
  17. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092313 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s00213-001-0970-5 · DOI
  19. 10.3390/ijerph17072445 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/14651858.CD001939 · DOI
  21. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1117 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/10915810490444424 · DOI
  23. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073155 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/arclin/acu020 · DOI
  25. 10.1249/01.mss.0000183186.98212.d5 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318258cb36 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02179.x · DOI
  29. 10.1089/neu.2015.4292 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0009922818806308 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000438 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/0363546513510389 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/arclin/acaa074 · DOI
  34. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002163 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.039 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3466 · DOI
  37. 10.1089/neu.2019.6956 · DOI
  38. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000225 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1089/neur.2022.0004 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002498 · DOI
  41. 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000823 · DOI
  42. 10.1089/neur.2022.0031 · DOI
  43. 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002870 · DOI
  44. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000946 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/arclin/acu014 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Corwin, D. J., Myers, S. R., Arbogast, K. B., Lim, M. M., Elliott, J. E., Metzger, K. B., LeRoux, P., Elkind, J., Metheny, H., Berg, J., Pettijohn, K., Master, C. L., Kirschen, M. P., & Cohen, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Oregon Alzheimer's Disease Research Center & Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center and Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York, USA.
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Department of Family Medicine, Suburban Community Hospital, East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2024-06
Volume
41
Issue
11-12
Pages
1299-1309
ISSN
  • 0897-7151
  • 1557-9042
Cited by
22
References
7
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Head Injury Treatment With Healthy and Advanced Dietary Supplements: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Branched Chain Amino Acids in the Treatment of Concussion in Adolescents and Young Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2023.0433
The paper
Corwin, D. J., Myers, S. R., Arbogast, K. B., Lim, M. M., Elliott, J. E., Metzger, K. B., LeRoux, P., Elkind, J., Metheny, H., Berg, J., Pettijohn, K., Master, C. L., Kirschen, M. P., & Cohen, A. S. (2024). Head Injury Treatment With Healthy and Advanced Dietary Supplements: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Branched Chain Amino Acids in the Treatment of Concussion in Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0433

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.