Cited by 48Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesSkin Protection and Aging

A new 675 nm laser device in the treatment of facial aging: A prospective observational study

Cannarozzo, Giovanni, Fazia, Gilda, Bennardo, Luigi, Tamburi, Federica, Amoruso, Giuseppe Fabrizio, Del Duca, Ester, Nisticò, Steven Paul·2021·Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a 675 nm laser device in the treatment of facial aging. Background: Wrinkles represent a major sign of aging skin and are considered a major topic in cosmetic dermatology, representing a common problem that negatively impacts patients' quality of life. Different types of treatments are currently available. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a new 675 nm laser source system on facial wrinkles. Methods: A total of 22 consecutive female (age 49.36 ± 8.72) patients, with Fitzpatrick skin types II–IV and facial wrinkles, were treated with three sessions of a 675 nm laser system. Efficacy of treatment was assessed using the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkles Scale pre and postoperatively before 3 months. Results: All 22 patients treated with the 675 nm laser had a significant improvement of facial wrinkles according to the FWS (from 1.59 ± 0.80 to 1 ± 0.64; p ≤ 0.001). No side effects occurred except a mild erythematous rash in two patients. Conclusions: This novel 675 nm laser system can be considered a promising and effective tool in patients with facial wrinkles, and it involves a simple post-treatment management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/photob.2020.4908

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Histological and ultrastructural studies show epidermal hyperplasia, damage and disorder of collagen fibers, and accumulation of abnormal elastic substances in connective tissue in photoaged skin.

    “Histological and ultrastructural studies have shown epidermal hyperplasia, damage, and disorder of collagen fibers, and a large accumulation of abnormal elastic substances in connective tissue in photoaged skin [32,33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannarozzo, G., Fazia, G., Bennardo, L., Tamburi, F., Amoruso, G. F., Del Duca, E., & Nisticò, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza (IT)
  • Department of Dermatology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Corresponding author
Bennardo, Luigi
Venue
Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
118-122
ISSN
2578-5478 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122719396
Cited by
48
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
facial wrinkles, facial aging, skin rejuvenation, treatment efficacy, treatment safety, erythema, Fitzpatrick skin type
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Skin Aging, Treatment Outcome, Lasers, Solid-State

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review