Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Efficient Method for Generation of Knockout Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9 System

Bohaciakova, Dasa, Renzova, Tereza, Fedorova, Veronika, Barak, Martin, Kunova Bosakova, Michaela, Hampl, Ales, Cajanek, Lukas·2017·Stem Cells and Development

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) represent a promising tool to study functions of genes during development, to model diseases, and to even develop therapies when combined with gene editing techniques such as CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease (Cas9) system. However, the process of disruption of gene expression by generation of null alleles is often inefficient and tedious. To circumvent these limitations, we developed a simple and efficient protocol to permanently downregulate expression of a gene of interest in hESCs using CRISPR/Cas9. We selected p53 for our proof of concept experiments. The methodology is based on series of hESC transfection, which leads to efficient downregulation of p53 expression even in polyclonal population (p53 Low cells), here proven by a loss of regulation of the expression of p53 target gene, microRNA miR-34a. We demonstrate that our approach achieves over 80% efficiency in generating hESC clonal sublines that do not express p53 protein. Importantly, we document by a set of functional experiments that such genetically modified hESCs do retain typical stem cells characteristics. In summary, we provide a simple and robust protocol to efficiently target expression of gene of interest in hESCs that can be useful for laboratories aiming to employ gene editing in their hESC applications/protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/scd.2017.0058

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nbt.2808 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkt555 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nbt.2647 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00006-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nbt1318 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.5966/sctm.2012-0081 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nbt1310 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/nature05939 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nbt.3536 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.7554/eLife.16270 · DOI
  18. 10.1083/jcb.201604054 · DOI
  19. 10.1083/jcb.201604081 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bohaciakova, D., Renzova, T., Fedorova, V., Barak, M., Kunova Bosakova, M., Hampl, A., & Cajanek, L.
Affiliations
Masaryk University
Venue
Stem Cells and Development
Published
2017-11
Volume
26
Issue
21
Pages
1521-1527
ISSN
  • 1547-3287
  • 1557-8534
Cited by
15
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.