Cited by 137Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Biocompatibility and Potential of Acellular Human Amniotic Membrane to Support the Attachment and Proliferation of Allogeneic Cells

Wilshaw, Stacy-Paul, Kearney, John, Fisher, John, Ingham, Eileen·2008·Tissue Engineering Part A

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the biocompatibility of an acellular human amniotic membrane biomaterial, which may have clinical utility for cell delivery. Human amniotic membrane was decellularized using 0.03% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), with hypotonic tris buffer and protease inhibitors and nuclease treatment. The membrane was terminally sterilized using an optimal concentration of peracetic acid. Residual SDS present within the acellular membrane was quantified using radio-labeled C14 SDS. In vivo biocompatibility was assessed by implantation of acellular human amniotic membrane subcutaneously into mice for 3 months and comparison with fresh and glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue. Cellular infiltrate into the explanted tissues was characterized using monoclonal antibodies against the following cell surface markers: CD3, CD4, CD34, and F4/80. Calcification was determined using the Von Kossa's stain. The potential of acellular human amniotic membrane to support the attachment and proliferation, and maintain viability of primary human dermal fibroblasts and primary human dermal keratinocytes was assessed in vitro, using a static culture system. Peracetic acid at a concentration of 0.1% (v/v) was sufficient for the sterilization of acellular amniotic membrane. Levels of SDS present within the acellular tissue were 0.62 +/- 0.13 microg/mg. Analysis of explanted samples from the mice indicated that acellular amniotic membrane contained low numbers of T-cells and high numbers of fibroblastic cells, macrophages, and endothelial cells, indicative of a wound-healing response. There was no evidence of calcification present within explanted acellular amniotic membrane compared to explanted glutaraldehyde-fixed amniotic membrane. Acellular amniotic membrane was shown to be capable of supporting the attachment and proliferation of primary human fibroblasts and keratinocytes. The viability of the cells was maintained for up to 4 weeks. Cell-seeded acellular amniotic membrane has the potential for delivering autologous or allogeneic cells to treat a variety of conditions, including diabetic foot ulcers, corneal defects, and severe skin burns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tea.2007.0145

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This low concentration of residual SDS was shown not to affect the viability of primary human dermal fibroblasts and primary human dermal keratinocytes cultured on the decellularized amniotic membrane.

    “Interestingly, this low concentration was shown not to affect the viability of primary human dermal fibroblasts and primary human dermal keratinocytes cultured on the decellularized amniotic membrane.”
  • Residual SDS was detected in both the final wash buffer (3.01 ± 2.72 μg/ml) and the decellularized amniotic membrane (0.62 ± 0.13 μg/mg).

    “Importantly, residual SDS was detected in both the final wash buffer (3.01 ± 2.72 μg/ml) and the decellularized amniotic membrane (0.62 ± 0.13 μg/mg).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilshaw, S.-P., Kearney, J., Fisher, J., & Ingham, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Tissue Services, National Blood Service, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part A
Published
2008-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
463-472
ISSN
  • 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-335X
OpenAlex
W2062798170
Cited by
137
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D524875/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
decellularization, sodium dodecyl sulfate, biocompatibility, dermal fibroblasts, keratinocytes, cell adhesion and proliferation, calcification, wound healing response, tissue explants, diabetic foot ulcer, corneal defects, burns
MeSH terms
Amnion, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Adhesion, Cell Survival, Cell-Free System, Cells, Cultured, Female, Fibroblasts, Humans, Materials Testing, Placenta, Pregnancy, Sterilization, Keratinocytes, Tissue Fixation, Implants, Experimental, Subcutaneous Tissue, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review