Cited by 267Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Engineered Human Skin Fabricated Using Electrospun Collagen–PCL Blends: Morphogenesis and Mechanical Properties

Powell, Heather M., Boyce, Steven T.·2009·Tissue Engineering Part A

Abstract

Engineered human skin is commonly fabricated using collagen scaffolds that often have poor mechanical properties. To improve the strength of collagen-based scaffolds, poly(caprolactone) (PCL) was blended with collagen and formed into submicron fibers using electrospinning. At concentrations < 10% PCL (M PCL /[M Collagen + M PCL ] × 100), the PCL component was evenly distributed within the collagen matrix. Increasing the PCL component to 30% caused separation of the collagen and PCL phases forming local domains of PCL within the collagen matrix. Tensile testing indicated that 10–100% PCL concentrations significantly improved the strength and stiffness of the acellular scaffolds. Engineered skin (ES) made with blended collagen–PCL at a concentration of up to 10% PCL did not significantly alter the stratification of the cells, cell proliferation, or epidermal differentiation compared to the 100% collagen group. Ultimate tensile strength of ES fabricated with the collagen–PCL blends was not significantly greater than that of ES made with 100% collagen scaffolds (0% PCL). The 30% PCL group had the least amount of mechanical strength likely caused by poor epidermal formation and reduced cell viability. These results indicate that minimal additions of PCL can be blended with collagen to produce scaffolds suitable for tissue engineering of human skin. However, the increase in scaffold strength with higher PCL concentrations did not result in significantly stronger ES, indicating that high cell viability and proper development of the epidermis are important factors for developing ES with high strength.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0473

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, H. M., & Boyce, S. T.
Affiliations
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Powell, Heather M.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part A
Published
2009-02-11
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
2177-2187
ISSN
  • 1937-3341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-335X
OpenAlex
W2042864468
Cited by
267
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio State University
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
polycaprolactone, electrospun scaffolds, submicron fibers, scaffold mechanical properties, tensile strength, phase separation, epidermal stratification, epidermal differentiation, cell viability, acellular scaffolds, skin tissue engineering
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Collagen, Humans, Materials Testing, Polyesters, Polymers, Skin, Tensile Strength, Cryoultramicrotomy, Coculture Techniques, Tissue Engineering, Cell Proliferation, Tissue Scaffolds, Mechanical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review