The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Prototyping: Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffolds Produced by Selective Laser Melting for Bone Tissue Engineering
Abstract
Selective laser melting (SLM), a method used in the nuclear, space, and racing industries, allows the creation of customized titanium alloy scaffolds with highly defined external shape and internal structure using rapid prototyping as supporting external structures within which bone tissue can grow. Human osteoblasts were cultured on SLM-produced Ti6Al4V mesh scaffolds to demonstrate biocompatibility using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fluorescence microscopy after cell vitality staining, and common biocompatibility tests (lactate dihydrogenase (LDH), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), and water soluble tetrazolium (WST)). Cell occlusion of pores of different widths (0.45-1.2 mm) was evaluated. Scaffolds were tested for resistance to compressive force. SEM investigations showed osteoblasts with well-spread morphology and multiple contact points. Cell vitality staining and biocompatibility tests confirmed osteoblast vitality and proliferation on the scaffolds. Pore overgrowth increased during 6 weeks' culture at pore widths of 0.45 and 0.5 mm, and in the course of 3 weeks for pore widths of 0.55, 0.6, and 0.7 mm. No pore occlusion was observed on pores of width 0.9-1.2 mm. Porosity and maximum compressive load at failure increased and decreased with increasing pore width, respectively. In summary, the scaffolds are biocompatible, and pore width influences pore overgrowth, resistance to compressive force, and porosity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rochus, P., Plesseria, J.-Y., Van Elsen, M., Kruth, J.-P., Carrus, R., & Dormal, T. (2007) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.004 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications
Yap, C. Y., Chua, C. K., Dong, Z. L., Liu, Z. H., Zhang, D. Q., Loh, L. E., & Sing, S. L. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4935926 · Cited by 2,353
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
Zhang, L., & Attar, H. (2016) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201500419 · Cited by 721
Surface Morphology in Selective Laser Melting of Metal Powders
Yadroitsev, I., & Smurov, I. (2011) · Physics Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.034 · Cited by 349
Li, Y., Yang, W., Li, X., Zhang, X., Wang, C., Meng, X., Pei, Y., Fan, X., Lan, P., Wang, C., et al. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b00331 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Warnke, P. H., Douglas, T., Wollny, P., Sherry, E., Steiner, M., Galonska, S., Becker, S. T., Springer, I. N., Wiltfang, J., & Sivananthan, S.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 1937-3384 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-3392
- OpenAlex
- W2082301825
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Prototyping: Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffolds Produced by Selective Laser Melting for Bone Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0288
- The paper
- Warnke, P. H., Douglas, T., Wollny, P., Sherry, E., Steiner, M., Galonska, S., Becker, S. T., Springer, I. N., Wiltfang, J., & Sivananthan, S. (2009). Rapid Prototyping: Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffolds Produced by Selective Laser Melting for Bone Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.