The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of Benign Cold Thyroid Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Percutaneous Laser Ablation Versus Levothyroxine Therapy or Follow-up
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare clinical and ultrasound (US) changes induced in cold thyroid nodules by US-guided percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) versus follow-up or levothyroxine (LT4) suppressive therapy. METHODS: 62 patients randomly assigned to a single PLA (Group 1), LT4 (Group 2), or follow-up (Group 3). Entry criteria: euthyroid patients with a solid thyroid nodule >5 mL and benign cytological findings. TREATMENT: Group 1: PLA was performed with a 1.064 mum neodymium yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser with output power of 3 W for 10 minutes; Group 2: the LT4 dose was adjusted to induce thyrotropin suppression; Group 3: no treatment. RESULTS: In Group 1 a significant nodule reduction was found 6 and 12 months after PLA (delta volume: -42.7 +/- 13.6%; p = 0.001). A reduction >50% was found in 33.3% of cases. In Group 2 a nonsignificant nodule shrinkage was observed. A nonsignificant volume increase was observed in Group 3. Improvement of local symptoms was registered in 81.2% of patients in Group 1 vs. 13.3% in Group 2 and 0.0% in Group 3 ( p = 0.001). No complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: A single PLA induced significant volume reduction and improvement of local symptoms. PLA was more effective than LT4. Follow-up was associated with nodule growth and progression of local symptoms. PLA should be considered a potential mini-invasive alternative to surgery in symptomatic patients with benign cold thyroid nodules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Low Serum Thyrotropin Concentrations as a Risk Factor for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Persons
Sawin, C. T., Geller, A., Wolf, P. A., Belanger, A. J., Baker, E., Bacharach, P., Wilson, P., Benjamin, E. J., & D'Agostino, R. B. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199411103311901 · Cited by 1,259
Parle, J. V., Maisonneuve, P., Sheppard, M. C., Boyle, P., & Franklyn, J. A. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06067-6 · Cited by 669
Risk for fracture in women with low serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone
Bauer, D. C., Ettinger, B., Nevitt, M. C., Stone, K. L., & for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-7-200104030-00009 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: safety and imaging follow-up in 236 patients
Jeong, W. K., Baek, J. H., Rhim, H., Kim, Y. S., Kwak, M. S., Jeong, H. J., & Lee, D. (2008) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0880-6 · Cited by 473
Thyroid nodule guidelines: agreement, disagreement and need for future research
Paschke, R., Hegedüs, L., Alexander, E., Valcavi, R., Papini, E., & Gharib, H. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2011.1 · Cited by 184
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Papini, E., Guglielmi, R., Bizzarri, G., Graziano, F., Bianchini, A., Brufani, C., Pacella, S., Valle, D., & Pacella, C. M.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-235
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2067510257
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.