Cited by 59Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Health and Trauma

Telepsychiatry Services for Korean Immigrants

Open access
Ye, Jiali, Shim, Ruth, Lukaszewski, Tim, Yun, Karen, Kim, Soo Hyun, Rust, George·2012·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Asian Americans often face cultural and language barriers when obtaining mental health treatment. With the small number of Asian mental health providers, it is difficult to ensure the linguistic and ethnic matching of providers and patients. Telepsychiatry holds great promise to address the unique needs of Asian Americans. We developed a project to establish telepsychiatry services that connect Korean mental health patients in Georgia with a linguistically and culturally competent psychiatrist in California and assessed the level of acceptability of psychiatric treatment via real-time teleconferencing among these patients. Upon the completion of the program, 16 patients (5 men, 11 women) completed a questionnaire that measured their acceptability of the telepsychiatry service. The findings indicate a high level of acceptance of the program among Korean patients. The quantitative and qualitative data show that they especially appreciated the cultural sensitivity of the consultation and the comfortable interaction with the provider. However, challenges such as technical issues of teleconferencing may negatively affect the quality of the clinical interaction. Our study expands the knowledge base regarding the acceptability of such services to a population that experiences disparities in mental health care. Future research should extend telepsychiatry services to other Asian population groups that experience lower access to mental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2012.0041

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When an intervention was used as part of ongoing in-person therapy, the way therapists used or were willing to use it influenced participants' engagement.

    “If an intervention was used as part of ongoing in-person therapy, the way that therapists used or were willing to use an intervention influenced participants’ engagement with an intervention [84,103,127,150,169,212,243].”

    From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [212]

    In the Results (page unavailable), patients said they liked the provider’s attitude, while some reported difficulty establishing rapport during video interviews. These findings connect provider interaction with patients’ experience, but the paper does not examine an intervention used within ongoing in-person therapy or whether therapists’ use or willingness to use it influenced engagement. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Mucic D. Telepsychiatry pilot-project in Denmark: Videoconference by distance by ethnic specialists to immigrants/refugees. World Cultural Psychiatry Res Rev. 2007;(Jan):3–9. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, J., Shim, R., Lukaszewski, T., Yun, K., Kim, S. H., & Rust, G.
Affiliations
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
  • Asian Community Mental Health Services (US)
  • Center for Pan Asian Community Services (US)
Corresponding author
Ye, Jiali
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2012-12
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
797-802
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2036219868
Cited by
58
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RR026137)
  • National Center for Research Resources (U54RR026137, P20RR011104)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD007588)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
telepsychiatry, Korean immigrants, Asian Americans, access to mental health care, cultural competence, language barriers, mental health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, California, Female, Georgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, Emigrants and Immigrants, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review