Cited by 168Interpreting and Communication in HealthcareMental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Health and Trauma

English Language Proficiency and Mental Health Service Use Among Latino and Asian Americans With Mental Disorders

Open access
Bauer, Amy M., Chen, Chih-Nan, Alegría, Margarita·2010·Medical Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The impact of language proficiency as a potential contributor to ethnic disparities in mental health care has received less attention than other factors. Data from the National Latino and Asian American Study were examined to assess the impact of limited English proficiency (LEP) on access to and quality of mental health care for community-dwelling Latino and Asian Americans with mental disorders. METHODS: English-proficient (EP) and LEP individuals with mental disorders were compared on lifetime use of healthcare services for a mental disorder, duration of untreated disorders, receipt of minimally adequate care, and barriers to treatment (eg, lack of identification of need for treatment, language barriers, and embarrassment or discomfort related to treatment). RESULTS: Compared with EP individuals, LEP individuals with mental disorders were significantly less likely to identify a need for mental health services, experience longer duration of untreated disorders, and use fewer healthcare services for mental disorders, particularly specialty mental health care. Receipt of minimally adequate care did not differ significantly by language proficiency. Embarrassment and discomfort were not more common among LEP individuals. Perceived need for treatment predicted lifetime mental healthcare use, whereas embarrassment and discomfort did not. CONCLUSIONS: Among Latino and Asian Americans with mental disorders, LEP contributes to disparities in access to care and longer duration of untreated disorders. Potential disparities in quality of care were difficult to detect in the context of low overall rates of mental healthcare use and quality of care among both LEP and EP individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181f80749

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with limited English proficiency are less likely to seek out specialty treatment like mental health care and, when diagnosed, have more severe long-term mental health complications.

    “Research has shown that individuals with limited English proficiency are less likely to seek out specialty treatment like mental health care and, when diagnosed, have more severe long-term mental health complications [18].”

    From Technology enabled clinical care (TECC): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of smartphone-augmented mental health treatment (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion reports that Latino and Asian Americans with limited English proficiency were less likely to seek mental health treatment, particularly specialty care, and had longer durations of untreated disorder. It does not report that, when diagnosed, they developed more severe long-term mental health complications; a longer untreated period is not the same as greater severity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, A. M., Chen, C.-N., & Alegría, M.
Affiliations
Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2010-12
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
1097-1104
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088385553
Cited by
168
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60md002261-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH073469, U01MH062209, T32MH019733)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60-MD-002261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
limited English proficiency, mental health service utilization, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, ethnic disparities, access to mental health care, barriers to treatment, language barriers, perceived need for treatment, mental health care quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Asian, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Communication Barriers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Social Environment, United States, Health Care Surveys, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review