The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 24 are not checked yet.
The Empirical Evidence for the Telemedicine Intervention in Diabetes Management
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The research presented here assesses the scientific evidence for the telemedicine intervention in the management of diabetes (telediabetes), gestational diabetes, and diabetic retinopathy. The impetus derives from the confluence of high prevalence of these diseases, increasing incidence, and rising costs, while telemedicine promises to ameliorate, if not prevent, type 2 diabetes and its complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A purposeful review of the literature identified relevant publications from January 2005 to December 2013. These were culled to retain only credible research articles for detailed review and analysis. The search yielded approximately 17,000 articles with no date constraints. Of these, 770 appeared to be research articles within our time frame. A review of the abstracts yielded 73 articles that met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. Evidence is organized by research findings regarding feasibility/acceptance, intermediate outcomes (e.g., use of service, and screening compliance), and health outcomes (control of glycemic level, lipids, body weight, and physical activity.) RESULTS: Definitions of telediabetes varied from study to study vis-à-vis diabetes subtype, setting, technology, staffing, duration, frequency, and target population. Outcome measures also varied. Despite these vagaries, sufficient evidence was obtained from a wide variety of research studies, consistently pointing to positive effects of telemonitoring and telescreening in terms of glycemic control, reduced body weight, and increased physical exercise. The major contributions point to telemedicine's potential for changing behaviors important to diabetes control and prevention, especially type 2 and gestational diabetes. Similarly, screening and monitoring for retinopathy can detect symptoms early that may be controlled or treated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is strong and consistent evidence of improved glycemic control among persons with type 2 and gestational diabetes as well as effective screening and monitoring of diabetic retinopathy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Synchronous human coaching has been shown to be effective in glycemic control for patients with T2DM [70] and has been explored in rural-specific settings as well [71,72].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199309303291401 · Cited by 24,667
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
American Diabetes Association (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s014 · Cited by 4,572
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137
Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes
Fajans, S. S. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,356
The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165 · Cited by 1,938
(2) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes
American Diabetes Association (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-s005 · Cited by 1,841
Thangaratinam, S., Rogozinska, E., Jolly, K., Glinkowski, S., Roseboom, T., Tomlinson, J. W., Kunz, R., Mol, B. W., Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2088 · Cited by 802
The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
Rosenthal, T. C. (2008) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.070287 · Cited by 508
The Empirical Evidence for Telemedicine Interventions in Mental Disorders
Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Bashshur, N., & Yellowlees, P. (2015) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0206 · Cited by 466
Self-citationThe Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions for Chronic Disease Management
Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Smith, B. R., Alverson, D. C., Antoniotti, N., Barsan, W. G., Bashshur, N., Brown, E. M., Coye, M. J., Doarn, C. R., et al. (2014) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.9981 · Cited by 452
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Ahmed AM, 2002, Saudi Med J, 23, 373
- Peters A, 2012, J Managed Care Med, 15, 52
- Fischer HH, 2012, Am J Managed Care, 18, 77
- Jordan RE, 2011, A retrospective comparison with the General Practice Research Database. BMC Public Health, 11, 707
- Stamp K, 2012, J Managed Care Med, 15, 38
- Barnett TE, 2006, Am J Managed Care, 12, 467
- Izquierdo R, 2007, Ther Clin Risk Manage, 3, 485
- 10.2337/dc12-0461 · DOI
- Virgili G, 2014, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, CD007419
- American Diabetes Association, 2015, Diabetes Care, 38, S1
- Ahmed R, 2012, W V Med J, 109, 6
- Vargas-Sánchez C, 2011, Salud Publica Mexico, 53, 212
- Villena JE, 2011, Rev Panam Salud Publica, 30, 408
- Richardson DR, 2012, W V Med J, 109, 52
- Li Z, 2012, Conn Med, 76, 85
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Arıöz, Y., Hancioglu, A. S., & Yılmaz, İ. (2026) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23952-5_4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Smith, B. R., & Woodward, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Michigan Medicine (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bashshur, Rashid L.
- Venue
- Telemedicine and e-Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 321-354
- ISSN
- 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3669
- PMC
- PMC4432488
- OpenAlex
- W2072335042
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (K23EY023596)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- telemedicine, type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, remote patient monitoring, telescreening, glycemic control, weight loss, physical activity, diabetes prevention, screening adherence
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, United States, Telemedicine, Evidence-Based Medicine, Disease Management, Empirical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review