Cited by 20Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and Technology

Unimaged Melanomas in Store-and-Forward Teledermatology

Gendreau, James L., Gemelas, Jordan, Wang, Melinda, Capulong, Dana, Lau, Clayton, Bratten, Dustin M., Dougall, Brittany, Markham, Craig +1 more·2017·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) readers can only diagnose what is imaged. This limitation has caused concern regarding the ability of primary care to direct imaging of lesions suspicious for melanoma. Melanomas not imaged by primary care providers (PCPs) are termed unimaged melanomas. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of unimaged melanomas among Veterans referred for care in a SFT program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All SFT patients with melanoma diagnosis were ascertained by query of the VA corporate data warehouse, Veterans Integrated Service Network 20 store-and-forward program database, and the VA Computerized Patient Record System. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011, 12,863 SFT consultations were conducted on 7,960 Veterans. Sixty-nine melanomas met inclusion and exclusion criteria; 13 melanomas were unimaged. The frequency of unimaged melanoma was 10.1 per 10,000 consultations. DISCUSSION: Our calculated frequency of unimaged melanomas associates SFT with noninferiority to face-to-face care. This study was conducted on an exclusively Veteran population, precluding generalizability to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs referring to store-and-forward teledermatology may fail to image melanomas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2016.0170

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gendreau, J. L., Gemelas, J., Wang, M., Capulong, D., Lau, C., Bratten, D. M., Dougall, B., Markham, C., & Raugi, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Raugi, Gregory J.
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2017-06
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
517-520
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2560810998
Cited by
20
References
16
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
store-and-forward teledermatology, melanoma diagnosis, primary care referral, veterans, telemedicine, non-inferiority, skin lesion imaging
MeSH terms
Dermatology, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Skin Neoplasms, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Telemedicine, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review