Cited by 41Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Utilization of Remote Patient Monitoring Within the United States Health Care System: A Scoping Review

Hayes, Corey J., Dawson, Leah, McCoy, Hannah, Hernandez, Michelle, Andersen, Jennifer, Ali, Mir M., Bogulski, Cari A., Eswaran, Hari·2023·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Introduction: Limited information exists on the landscape of studies and policies for remote patient monitoring (RPM) in the United States. Methods: We conducted a scoping review to assess (1) for which adult patient populations and health care needs is RPM being used and (2) the landscape of national- and state-level reimbursement policies for RPM. This study was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework for scoping reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Results: A total of 399 articles were included in our final sample: 268 study articles and 131 articles of gray literature (e.g., websites, legislative bills). RPM-related articles rose drastically from 2015 to 2021, and the vast majority of articles were peer-reviewed journal articles. Of the study articles, prospective cohort studies were the most common study method, with m-health/smart watches being the most common RPM modality. RPM was found to be most commonly tested within patients with cardiovascular diseases, and the most common outcomes measured were usability and feasibility. Gray literature found 36 U.S. state Medicaid programs had reimbursement policies for RPM in 2021; however, 28 of those had at least one restriction on reimbursement (e.g., limited to specific providers). Conclusions: Despite the rapid growth in the literature on RPM and the adoption of reimbursement policies, retrospective, population-level studies, large randomized controlled trials, studies with a focus on additional favorable outcomes (e.g., quality of life), and studies evaluating trends in RPM reimbursement policies are lacking in the current literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2022.0111

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In addition to limitations on generalizability and possible selection bias, user engagement challenges and considerable dropout rates have presented challenges in clinical trials of smartphone apps.

    “In addition to limitations on generalizability and possible selection bias, user engagement challenges 148 and considerable dropout rates have presented challenges in clinical trials of smartphone apps.”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [148]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, C. J., Dawson, L., McCoy, H., Hernandez, M., Andersen, J., Ali, M. M., Bogulski, C. A., & Eswaran, H.
Affiliations
  • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Corey J.
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2023-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
384-394
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W4285077946
Cited by
41
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, reimbursement policy, Medicaid, health care utilization, cardiovascular disease, wearable devices, mobile health, health policy, United States
MeSH terms
Adult, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review