Cited by 252Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare during COVID-19 PandemicDental Research and COVID-19

Rapid implementation of a COVID-19 remote patient monitoring program

Open access
Annis, Tucker, Pleasants, Susan, Hultman, Gretchen, Lindemann, Elizabeth, Thompson, Joshua A, Billecke, Stephanie, Badlani, Sameer, Melton, Genevieve B·2020·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective: The study sought to evaluate early lessons from a remote patient monitoring engagement and education technology solution for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms. Materials and Methods: A COVID-19–specific remote patient monitoring solution (GetWell Loop) was offered to patients with COVID-19 symptoms. The program engaged patients and provided educational materials and the opportunity to share concerns. Alerts were resolved through a virtual care workforce of providers and medical students. Results: Between March 18 and April 20, 2020, 2255 of 3701 (60.93%) patients with COVID-19 symptoms enrolled, resulting in over 2303 alerts, 4613 messages, 13 hospital admissions, and 91 emergency room visits. A satisfaction survey was given to 300 patient respondents, 74% of whom would be extremely likely to recommend their doctor. Discussion: This program provided a safe and satisfying experience for patients while minimizing COVID-19 exposure and in-person healthcare utilization. Conclusions: Remote patient monitoring appears to be an effective approach for managing COVID-19 symptoms at home.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocaa097

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annis, T., Pleasants, S., Hultman, G., Lindemann, E., Thompson, J. A., Billecke, S., Badlani, S., & Melton, G. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Fairview Health Services (US)
Corresponding author
Melton, Genevieve B
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2020-07-27
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1326-1330
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W3022845676
Cited by
252
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 17
FWCI
37.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, remote patient monitoring, home health monitoring, patient engagement, patient education, virtual care, medical students, hospitalization, emergency department visits, patient satisfaction, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Patient Generated Health Data, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Minnesota, Patient Education as Topic, Pneumonia, Viral, Students, Medical, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Organizational Case Studies, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review