Cited by 109Mosquito-borne diseases and controlViral Infections and VectorsInfluenza Virus Research Studies

Rapid Amplification of West Nile Virus: The Role of Hatch-Year Birds

Hamer, Gabriel L., Walker, Edward D., Brawn, Jeffrey D., Loss, Scott R., Ruiz, Marilyn O., Goldberg, Tony L., Schotthoefer, Anna M., Brown, William M. +2 more·2008·Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Abstract

Epizootic transmission of West Nile virus (WNV) often intensifies rapidly leading to increasing risk of human infection, but the processes underlying amplification remain poorly understood. We quantified epizootic WNV transmission in communities of mosquitoes and birds in the Chicago, Illinois (USA) region during 2005 and 2006. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, we detected WNV in 227 of 1195 mosquito pools (19%) in 2005 and 205 of 1685 (12%) in 2006; nearly all were Culex pipiens. In both years, mosquito infection rates increased rapidly in the second half of July to a peak of 59/1000 mosquitoes in 2005 and 33/1000 in 2006, and then declined slowly. Viral RNA was detected in 11 of 998 bird sera (1.1%) in 2005 and 3 of 1285 bird sera (<1%) in 2006; 11 of the 14 virus-positive birds were hatch-year birds. Of 540 hatch-year birds, 100 (18.5%) were seropositive in 2005, but only 2.8% (14/493) tested seropositive in 2006 for WNV antibodies using inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We observed significant time series cross-correlations between mosquito infection rate and proportion of virus-positive birds, proportion of hatch-year birds captured in mist nets (significant in 2006 only), seroprevalence of hatch-year birds, and number of human cases in both seasons. These associations, coupled with the predominance of WNV infection and seropositivity in hatch-year birds, indicate a key role for hatch-year birds in the amplification of epizoo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/vbz.2007.0123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is difficult to gather large samples of birds displaying active WNV infections.

    “These complications limit interpretation of seroprevalence results; however, it is di Y cult to gather large samples of birds displaying active WNV infections (Hamer et al. 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamer, G. L., Walker, E. D., Brawn, J. D., Loss, S. R., Ruiz, M. O., Goldberg, T. L., Schotthoefer, A. M., Brown, W. M., Wheeler, E., & Kitron, U. D.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2008-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
57-68
ISSN
  • 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7759
OpenAlex
W2053046809
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Florida Department of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
Keywords
West Nile virus, viral amplification, mosquito-bird transmission, Culex pipiens, seroprevalence, mosquito infection rate, human infection risk, Chicago
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Wild, Antibodies, Viral, Birds, Chicago, Culex, Disease Reservoirs, Humans, Insect Bites and Stings, Insect Vectors, RNA, Viral, Seasons, Species Specificity, West Nile Fever, West Nile virus, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sentinel Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review