Rapid Amplification of West Nile Virus: The Role of Hatch-Year Birds
Abstract
Epizootic transmission of West Nile virus (WNV) often intensifies rapidly leading to increasing risk of human infection, but the processes underlying amplification remain poorly understood. We quantified epizootic WNV transmission in communities of mosquitoes and birds in the Chicago, Illinois (USA) region during 2005 and 2006. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, we detected WNV in 227 of 1195 mosquito pools (19%) in 2005 and 205 of 1685 (12%) in 2006; nearly all were Culex pipiens. In both years, mosquito infection rates increased rapidly in the second half of July to a peak of 59/1000 mosquitoes in 2005 and 33/1000 in 2006, and then declined slowly. Viral RNA was detected in 11 of 998 bird sera (1.1%) in 2005 and 3 of 1285 bird sera (<1%) in 2006; 11 of the 14 virus-positive birds were hatch-year birds. Of 540 hatch-year birds, 100 (18.5%) were seropositive in 2005, but only 2.8% (14/493) tested seropositive in 2006 for WNV antibodies using inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We observed significant time series cross-correlations between mosquito infection rate and proportion of virus-positive birds, proportion of hatch-year birds captured in mist nets (significant in 2006 only), seroprevalence of hatch-year birds, and number of human cases in both seasons. These associations, coupled with the predominance of WNV infection and seropositivity in hatch-year birds, indicate a key role for hatch-year birds in the amplification of epizoo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is difficult to gather large samples of birds displaying active WNV infections.
“These complications limit interpretation of seroprevalence results; however, it is di Y cult to gather large samples of birds displaying active WNV infections (Hamer et al. 2008).”
From Avian host community structure and prevalence of West Nile virus in Chicago, Illinois (2009) · cites this paper as Hamer et al. 2008
Cites
Ezenwa, V. O., Godsey, M. S., King, R. J., & Guptill, S. C. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3284 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Host selection by Culex pipiens mosquitoes and West Nile virus amplification
Hamer, G. L., Kitron, U. D., Goldberg, T. L., Brawn, J. D., Loss, S. R., Ruiz, M. O., Hayes, D. B., & Walker, E. D. (2009) · The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80.268 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Self-citationAvian host community structure and prevalence of West Nile virus in Chicago, Illinois
Loss, S. R., Hamer, G. L., Walker, E. D., Ruiz, M. O., Goldberg, T. L., Kitron, U. D., & Brawn, J. D. (2009) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1224-6 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationWest Nile virus eco-epidemiology and climate change
Heidecke, J., Lavarello Schettini, A., & Rocklöv, J. (2023) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000129 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Boothe, E., Medeiros, M. C. I., Kitron, U. D., Brawn, J. D., Ruiz, M. O., Goldberg, T. L., Walker, E. D., & Hamer, G. L. (2015) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jme/tjv029 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hamer, G. L., Walker, E. D., Brawn, J. D., Loss, S. R., Ruiz, M. O., Goldberg, T. L., Schotthoefer, A. M., Brown, W. M., Wheeler, E., & Kitron, U. D.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-68
- ISSN
- 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7759
- OpenAlex
- W2053046809
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Florida Department of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Keywords
- West Nile virus, viral amplification, mosquito-bird transmission, Culex pipiens, seroprevalence, mosquito infection rate, human infection risk, Chicago
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Wild, Antibodies, Viral, Birds, Chicago, Culex, Disease Reservoirs, Humans, Insect Bites and Stings, Insect Vectors, RNA, Viral, Seasons, Species Specificity, West Nile Fever, West Nile virus, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sentinel Surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review