The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phage Neutralization by Sera of Patients Receiving Phage Therapy
Open accessAbstract
The aim of our investigation was to verify whether phage therapy (PT) can induce antiphage antibodies. The antiphage activity was determined in sera from 122 patients from the Phage Therapy Unit in Wrocław with bacterial infections before and during PT, and in sera from 30 healthy volunteers using a neutralization test. Furthermore, levels of antiphage antibodies were investigated in sera of 19 patients receiving staphylococcal phages and sera of 20 healthy volunteers using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The phages were administered orally, locally, orally/locally, intrarectally, or orally/intrarectally. The rate of phage inactivation (K) estimated the level of phages' neutralization by human sera. Low K rates were found in sera of healthy volunteers (K ≤ 1.73). Low K rates were detected before PT (K ≤ 1.64). High antiphage activity of sera K > 18 was observed in 12.3% of examined patients (n = 15) treated with phages locally (n = 13) or locally/orally (n = 2) from 15 to 60 days of PT. High K rates were found in patients treated with some Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis phages. Low K rates were observed during PT in sera of patients using phages orally (K ≤ 1.04). Increased inactivation of phages by sera of patients receiving PT decreased after therapy. These results suggest that the antiphage activity in patients' sera depends on the route of phage administration and phage type. The induction of antiphage activity of sera during or after PT does not exclude a favorable result of PT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pirnay, J.-P., Djebara, S., Steurs, G., Griselain, J., Cochez, C., De Soir, S., Glonti, T., Spiessens, A., Vanden Berghe, E., Green, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01705-x · Cited by 474
Interactions between Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and the Mammalian Immune System
Van Belleghem, J. D., Dąbrowska, K., Vaneechoutte, M., Barr, J. J., & Bollyky, P. L. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v11010010 · Cited by 408
Revisiting phage therapy: new applications for old resources
Nobrega, F. L., Costa, A. R., Kluskens, L. D., & Azeredo, J. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.006 · Cited by 310
Mammalian Host-Versus-Phage immune response determines phage fate in vivo
Hodyra-Stefaniak, K., Miernikiewicz, P., Drapała, J., Drab, M., Jończyk-Matysiak, E., Lecion, D., Kaźmierczak, Z., Beta, W., Majewska, J., Harhala, M., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14802 · Cited by 302
Self-citationPhage Therapy in the Resistance Era: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?
Luong, T., Salabarria, A.-C., & Roach, D. R. (2020) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.07.014 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Łusiak-Szelachowska, M., Żaczek, M., Weber-Dąbrowska, B., Międzybrodzki, R., Kłak, M., Fortuna, W., Letkiewicz, S., Rogóż, P., Szufnarowski, K., Jończyk-Matysiak, E., Owczarek, B., & Górski, A.
- Venue
- Viral Immunology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 295-304
- ISSN
- 0882-8245 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8976
- OpenAlex
- W2318901692
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phage Neutralization by Sera of Patients Receiving Phage Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/vim.2013.0128
- The paper
- Łusiak-Szelachowska, M., Żaczek, M., Weber-Dąbrowska, B., Międzybrodzki, R., Kłak, M., Fortuna, W., Letkiewicz, S., Rogóż, P., Szufnarowski, K., Jończyk-Matysiak, E., Owczarek, B., & Górski, A. (2014). Phage Neutralization by Sera of Patients Receiving Phage Therapy. Viral Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2013.0128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.