The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Electrical Response to Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Wound Healing
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Natural, endogenous electric fields (EFs) and currents arise spontaneously after wounding of many tissues, especially epithelia, and are necessary for normal healing. This wound electrical activity is a long-lasting and regulated response. Enhancing or inhibiting this electrical activity increases or decreases wound healing, respectively. Cells that are responsible for wound closure such as corneal epithelial cells or skin keratinocytes migrate directionally in EFs of physiological magnitude. However, the mechanisms of how the wound electrical response is initiated and regulated remain unclear. Recent Advances: Wound EFs and currents appear to arise by ion channel up-regulation and redistribution, which are perhaps triggered by an intracellular calcium wave or cell depolarization. We discuss the possibility of stimulation of wound healing via pharmacological enhancement of the wound electric signal by stimulation of ion pumping. Critical Issues: Chronic wounds are a major problem in the elderly and diabetic patient. Any strategy to stimulate wound healing in these patients is desirable. Applying electrical stimulation directly is problematic, but pharmacological enhancement of the wound signal may be a promising strategy. Future Directions: Understanding the molecular regulation of wound electric signals may reveal some fundamental mechanisms in wound healing. Manipulating fluxes of ions and electric currents at wounds might offer new approaches to achieve better wound healing and to heal chronic wounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Singer, A. J., & Clark, R. A. F. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909023411006 · Cited by 6,106
Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress
Bassett, C. A. L., & Becker, R. O. (1962) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.137.3535.1063 · Cited by 778
The molecular biology of chronic wounds and delayed healing in diabetes
Blakytny, R., & Jude, E. (2006) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01773.x · Cited by 632
A contact lens with embedded sensor for monitoring tear glucose level
Yao, H., Shum, A. J., Cowan, M., Lähdesmäki, I., & Parviz, B. A. (2011) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2010.12.042 · Cited by 513
Cited by
Piezoelectric materials as stimulatory biomedical materials and scaffolds for bone repair
Tandon, B., Blaker, J. J., & Cartmell, S. H. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.026 · Cited by 420
Mao, L., Hu, S., Gao, Y., Wang, L., Zhao, W., Fu, L., Cheng, H., Xia, L., Xie, S., Ye, W., et al. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202000872 · Cited by 412
Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair
Wei, S., Ma, J.-X., Xu, L., Gu, X.-S., & Ma, X.-L. (2020) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-020-00280-6 · Cited by 406
Piezoelectric energy harvesting systems for biomedical applications
Panda, S., Hajra, S., Mistewicz, K., In-na, P., Sahu, M., Rajaitha, P. M., & Kim, H. J. (2022) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107514 · Cited by 269
Emerging Roles of the Membrane Potential: Action Beyond the Action Potential
Abdul Kadir, L., Stacey, M., & Barrett-Jolley, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01661 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Reid, B., & Zhao, M.
- Venue
- Advances in Wound Care
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-201
- ISSN
- 2162-1918 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-1934
- OpenAlex
- W2149409343
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Electrical Response to Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Wound Healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/wound.2013.0442
- The paper
- Reid, B., & Zhao, M. (2014). The Electrical Response to Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Wound Healing. Advances in Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0442
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.