Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The bases of probability

Open access
Koopman, B. O.·1940·Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society

Abstract

The subject for consideration today forms an aspect of a somewhat venerable branch of mathematical theory; but in essence it is part of a far older department of thought—the ancient science of logic. For it is concerned with a category of propositions of a nature marked by features neither physical nor mathematical, but by their rôle under the aspect of the reason. Their essential characteristic is their involvement of that species of relation between the knower and the known evoked by such terms as probability, likelihood, degree of certainty, as used in the parlance of intuitive thought. It is our threefold task to transcribe this concept into symbols, to formulate its principles, and to study its properties in their inner order and outward application. As prelude to this undertaking it is necessary to set forth certain conventions of logic. Propositions are the elements of symbolic logic, but they may play the rôle of contemplated propositions (statements in quotation marks) or of asserted propositions (statements regarded as true throughout a given manipulation or deduction) ; and it is necessary to take account of this in the notation for the logical constants. We shall employ the symbols for negation ( ^ ) , conjunction or logical product ( • ) , and disjunction or logical sum ( V), and regard them as having no assertive power : they combine contemplated propositions into contemplated propositions and asserted propositions into asserted propositions of the same logical type. Quite other shall be our convention regarding implication ( c ) and equivalence ( = ) : they combine contemplated propositions into asserted propositions, and shall not be used to combine asserted propositions in our present study. If a and b stand for contemplated propositions, the assertion that a is false (true) shall be written a = 0 (# = 1), and the assertion that a implies ô, a c b or a ^ o = 0; it is thus quite different from the contemplated proposition ~(a~b). Finally it is universally asserted that a~a = 0, a \/~a = 1$ and in fact all the laws of Boolean algebra are regarded as assertions. We shall assume their elements to be fa-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1090/s0002-9904-1940-07294-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Koopman, B. O.
Venue
Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society
Published
1940
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
763-774
ISSN
  • 0002-9904 (ISSN-L)
  • 0273-0979
  • 1088-9485
OpenAlex
W2086742483
Cited by
205
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The bases of probability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1090/s0002-9904-1940-07294-5
The paper
Koopman, B. O. (1940). The bases of probability. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9904-1940-07294-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.