The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the product of semi-groups of operators
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For this type of differential equation consisting of a sum of integrable parts, it is very natural to use a Lie-Trotter splitting approach [16,29,30], where one evolves according to each integrable part for a small time t.”
From Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“The key ingredient of TEBD-based methods is a Lie-Trotter-Suzuki [16,17] splitting of the Schrödinger equation according to the individual terms ĥi of the Hamiltonian Ĥ = i ĥi .”
From Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“If this is true, then the operator e -iHt can be implemented in terms of the corresponding operators for every term in the Hamiltonian, using the Trotter-Suzuki formula [164]:”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [164]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional Analysis and Semi-groups
Hille, E., & Phillips, R. (1996) · Colloquium Publications - American Mathematical Society/Colloquium Publications · doi:10.1090/coll/031 · Cited by 4,047
Approximation of semi-groups of operators
Trotter, H. F. (1958) · Pacific Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.2140/pjm.1958.8.887 · Cited by 459
Self-citationOn the Generation of Unbounded Semi-Groups of Bounded Linear Operators
Feller, W. (1953) · Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1969826 · Cited by 62
Dye, H. A., & Phillips, R. S. (1956) · Canadian Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.4153/cjm-1956-055-1 · Cited by 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,001
Matrix Product States for Dynamical Simulation of Infinite Chains
Bañuls, M. C., Hastings, M. B., Verstraete, F., & Cirac, J. I. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.240603 · Cited by 201
New Trends in Density Matrix Renormalization
Hallberg, K. (2006) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 183
On the short-time limit of ring polymer molecular dynamics
Braams, B. J., & Manolopoulos, D. E. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2357599 · Cited by 182
Evidence for Unbounded Growth of the Number Entropy in Many-Body Localized Phases
Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, M., Unanyan, R. G., Fleischhauer, M., & Sirker, J. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.243601 · Cited by 179
Tensor Network Contractions: Methods and Applications to Quantum Many-Body Systems
Ran, S.-J., Tirrito, E., Peng, C., Chen, X., Tagliacozzo, L., Su, G., & Lewenstein, M. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34489-4 · Cited by 176
NISQ computing: where are we and where do we go?
Lau, J. W. Z., Lim, K. H., Shrotriya, H., & Kwek, L. C. (2022) · AAPPS bulletin · doi:10.1007/s43673-022-00058-z · Cited by 199
Ab initio computations of molecular systems by the auxiliary‐field quantum Monte Carlo method
Motta, M., & Zhang, S. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1364 · Cited by 183
World-line quantum Monte Carlo algorithm for a one-dimensional Bose model
Batrouni, G. G., & Scalettar, R. T. (1992) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.46.9051 · Cited by 174
Emerging quantum computing algorithms for quantum chemistry
Motta, M., & Rice, J. E. (2021) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1580 · Cited by 201
U(1) Wilson lattice gauge theories in digital quantum simulators
Muschik, C. A., Heyl, M., Martinez, E. A., Monz, T., Schindler, P., Vogell, B., Dalmonte, M., Hauke, P., Blatt, R., & Zoller, P. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa89ab · Cited by 164
Quantum annealing: an overview
Rajak, A., Suzuki, S., Dutta, A., & Chakrabarti, B. K. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0417 · Cited by 182
Application of the Nosé−Hoover Chain Algorithm to the Study of Protein Dynamics
Cheng, A., & Merz, K. M. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp951968y · Cited by 169
Kivlichan, I. D., Gidney, C., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., McClean, J., Sun, W., Jiang, Z., Rubin, N., Fowler, A., Aspuru-Guzik, A., et al. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-07-16-296 · Cited by 173
Variational quantum eigensolver with fewer qubits
Liu, J.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Wan, Y., & Wang, L. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.023025 · Cited by 166
Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface
Klco, N., Roggero, A., & A, M. J. S. (2022) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac58a4 · Cited by 209
Zeros of the Partition Function for the Heisenberg, Ferroelectric, and General Ising Models
Suzuki, M., & Fisher, M. E. (1971) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1665583 · Cited by 164
Mináry, P., Martyna, G. J., & Tuckerman, M. E. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1534582 · Cited by 163
Simulation and understanding of atomic and molecular quantum crystals
Cazorla, C., & Boronat, J. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035003 · Cited by 158
Mitigating Depolarizing Noise on Quantum Computers with Noise-Estimation Circuits
Urbánek, M., Nachman, B. P., Pascuzzi, V. R., He, A., Bauer, C. W., & de Jong, W. A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.270502 · Cited by 205
Quantum Algorithms to Simulate Many-Body Physics of Correlated Fermions
Jiang, Z., Sung, K. J., Kechedzhi, K., Smelyanskiy, V. N., & Boixo, S. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.9.044036 · Cited by 175
Jørgensen, M. R., & Pollock, F. A. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.240602 · Cited by 162
Ananth, N. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4821590 · Cited by 157
Quantum Computers as Universal Quantum Simulators: State‐of‐the‐Art and Perspectives
Tacchino, F., Chiesa, A., Carretta, S., & Gerace, D. (2019) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201900052 · Cited by 172
Numerical calculation of path integrals: The small-polaron model
Raedt, H. A. D., & Lagendijk, A. (1983) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.27.6097 · Cited by 154
Constructing exact representations of quantum many-body systems with deep neural networks
Carleo, G., Nomura, Y., & Imada, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07520-3 · Cited by 194
Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges
Fauseweh, B. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9 · Cited by 152
Machine learning method for state preparation and gate synthesis on photonic quantum computers
Arrazola, J. M., Bromley, T. R., Izaac, J., Myers, C. R., Brádler, K., & Killoran, N. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaf59e · Cited by 153
Moore, P. B., Lopez, C. F., & Klein, M. L. (2001) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(01)75894-8 · Cited by 150
Quantum Algorithm for Simulating Real Time Evolution of Lattice Hamiltonians
Haah, J., Hastings, M. B., Kothari, R., & Low, G. H. (2021) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/18m1231511 · Cited by 205
Zero-noise extrapolation for quantum-gate error mitigation with identity insertions
He, A., Nachman, B. P., de Jong, W. A., & Bauer, C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.012426 · Cited by 170
New results on Trotter-like approximations
Fye, R. M. (1986) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.33.6271 · Cited by 151
Suzuki, M. (1977) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01614161 · Cited by 146
Time-Domain Ab Initio Modeling of Photoinduced Dynamics at Nanoscale Interfaces
Wang, L., Long, R., & Prezhdo, O. V. (2015) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040214-121359 · Cited by 147
Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface–Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code
Noh, K., & Chamberland, C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012316 · Cited by 164
Dynamical quantum phase transitions (Review Article)
Zvyagin, A. A. (2016) · Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4969869 · Cited by 156
Application of Ising Machines and a Software Development for Ising Machines
Tanahashi, K., Takayanagi, S., Motohashi, T., & Tanaka, S. (2019) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.061010 · Cited by 142
On the asymptotic exactness of the Bogoliubov approximation for many boson systems
Ginibre, J. (1968) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01646422 · Cited by 141
Slow delocalization of particles in many-body localized phases
Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, M., Unanyan, R. G., Fleischhauer, M., & Sirker, J. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.024203 · Cited by 138
Suzuki, M., & Inoue, M. (1987) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.78.787 · Cited by 138
Chernoff-type bound for finite Markov chains
Lezaud, P. (1998) · The Annals of Applied Probability · doi:10.1214/aoap/1028903453 · Cited by 137
Digital lattice gauge theories
Zohar, E., Farace, A., Reznik, B., & Cirac, J. I. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.023604 · Cited by 130
A review of Quantum Cellular Automata
Farrelly, T. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-30-368 · Cited by 138
Sun, S.-N., Motta, M., Tazhigulov, R. N., Tan, A. T. K., Chan, G. K.-L., & Minnich, A. J. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010317 · Cited by 152
Constructing exact representations of quantum many-body systems with deep neural networks
Carleo, G., Nomura, Y., & Imada, M. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000313237 · Cited by 156
Hardware Efficient Quantum Simulation of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories with Qudits on Rydberg Platforms
González-Cuadra, D., Zache, T. V., Carrasco, J. A., Kraus, B., & Zoller, P. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.160501 · Cited by 133
Weak Approximation for Semilinear Stochastic Evolution Equations
Hausenblas, E. (2003) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8020-6_5 · Cited by 131
Interplay of quantum and thermal fluctuations in a frustrated magnet
Isakov, S. V., & Moessner, R. (2003) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.104409 · Cited by 131
Quantum statistical monte carlo methods and applications to spin systems
Suzuki, M. (1986) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02628318 · Cited by 129
Loop, string, and hadron dynamics in SU(2) Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories
Raychowdhury, I., & Stryker, J. R. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.114502 · Cited by 129
Adaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations
Yao, Y.-X., Gomes, N., Zhang, F., Wang, C.-Z., Ho, K.-M., Iadecola, T., & Orth, P. P. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030307 · Cited by 152
Exponential power series expansion for the quantum time evolution operator
Makri, N., & Miller, W. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456116 · Cited by 130
Goldstein, J. A. (1969) · Transactions of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1969-0247524-5 · Cited by 130
Faster methods for contracting infinite two-dimensional tensor networks
Fishman, M. T., Vanderstraeten, L., Zauner-Stauber, V., Haegeman, J., & Verstraete, F. (2018) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.235148 · Cited by 128
Continuous nonlinear perturbations of linear accretive operators in banach spaces
Webb, G. F. (1972) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1016/0022-1236(72)90048-1 · Cited by 128
Stuart, S. J., Zhou, R., & Berne, B. J. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.472005 · Cited by 127
Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: An efficient algorithm
Czarnik, P., Dziarmaga, J., & Corboz, P. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.035115 · Cited by 134
A C*-ALGEBRAIC FRAMEWORK FOR QUANTUM GROUPS
MASUDA, T., Nakagami, Y., & Woronowicz, S. L. (2003) · International Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1142/s0129167x03002071 · Cited by 126
Exploiting Locality in Quantum Computation for Quantum Chemistry
McClean, J. R., Babbush, R., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz501649m · Cited by 125
Benchmarking the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
Willsch, M., Willsch, D., Jin, F., De Raedt, H., & Michielsen, K. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02692-8 · Cited by 128
Using Quantum Computers for Quantum Simulation
Brown, K. L., Munro, W. J., & Kendon, V. M. (2010) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e12112268 · Cited by 129
“A first order Trotter-Suzuki simulation thus requires τ ∝ t2/ǫ.”
MethodInfluentialElectron-Phonon Systems on a Universal Quantum Computer
Macridin, A., Spentzouris, P., Amundson, J. F., & Harnik, R. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.110504 · Cited by 120
Tranter, A., Love, P. J., Mintert, F., & Coveney, P. V. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00450 · Cited by 138
High-Order Exponential Operator Splitting Methods for Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equations
Thalhammer, M. (2008) · SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1137/060674636 · Cited by 124
Lüchow, A. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.40 · Cited by 123
Fully Quantum Fluctuation Theorems
Åberg, J. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011019 · Cited by 137
Linear Optics Simulation of Quantum Non-Markovian Dynamics
Chiuri, A., Greganti, C., Mazzola, L., Paternostro, M., & Mataloni, P. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00968 · Cited by 122
“Conceptually, the simulation consists of the forward evolu tion of S over discrete time slices [29] according to a TrotterSuzuki decomposition [30] of the total time propagator (see Appendix).”
Expanding the prediction capacity in long sequence time-series forecasting
Zhou, H., Li, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, S., Yan, M., & Xiong, H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2023.103886 · Cited by 138
Interval estimation for continuous-time switched linear systems
Ethabet, H., Rabehi, D., Efimov, D. V., & Raïssi, T. (2018) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2017.12.035 · Cited by 121
A path integral Monte Carlo study of liquid neon and the quantum effective pair potential
Thirumalai, D., Hall, R. W., & Berne, B. J. (1984) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.447985 · Cited by 121
Ising spin glass in a transverse field: Replica-symmetry-breaking solution
Goldschmidt, Y. Y., & Lai, P.-Y. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.2467 · Cited by 118
Monte Carlo studies of one-dimensional quantum Heisenberg and XY models
Cullen, J. J., & Landau, D. P. (1983) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.27.297 · Cited by 118
Design of quasisymplectic propagators for Langevin dynamics
Melchionna, S. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2753496 · Cited by 117
Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of dense plasmas: The Cimarron Project
Graziani, F. R., Batista, V. S., Benedict, L. X., Castor, J. I., Chen, H., Chen, S. N., Fichtl, C., Glosli, J. N., Grabowski, P., Graf, A. T., et al. (2011) · High Energy Density Physics · doi:10.1016/j.hedp.2011.06.010 · Cited by 117
Orús, R. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.205117 · Cited by 118
Molecular systems with open boundaries: Theory and simulation
Site, L. D., & Praprotnik, M. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.007 · Cited by 106
Sesé, L. M. (1995) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268979500101571 · Cited by 116
Classical equivalents of one-dimensional quantum-mechanical systems
Barma, M., & Shastry, B. S. (1978) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.18.3351 · Cited by 115
Efficient quantum circuits for diagonal unitaries without ancillas
Welch, J., Greenbaum, D., Mostame, S., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033040 · Cited by 114
Pulsed Laser Cooling for Cavity Optomechanical Resonators
Machnes, S., Cerrillo, J., Aspelmeyer, M., Wieczorek, W., Plenio, M. B., & Retzker, A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.153601 · Cited by 116
Digital quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in three spatial dimensions
Bender, J., Zohar, E., Farace, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aadb71 · Cited by 108
Aydeniz, K. Y., Pooser, R. C., & Siopsis, G. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00290-1 · Cited by 113
Digital Quantum Simulation of Z2 Lattice Gauge Theories with Dynamical Fermionic Matter
Zohar, E., Farace, A., Reznik, B., & Cirac, J. I. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.070501 · Cited by 110
Master equations and the theory of stochastic path integrals
Weber, M. F., & Frey, E. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5ae2 · Cited by 123
Stochastic non-equilibrium systems
Stinchcombe, R. B. (2001) · Advances In Physics · doi:10.1080/00018730110099650 · Cited by 113
Path integral simulations of rotors: theory and applications
Marx, D., & Müser, M. H. (1999) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/11/11/003 · Cited by 111
Molecular Quantum Dynamics: A Quantum Computing Perspective
Ollitrault, P. J., Miessen, A., & Tavernelli, I. (2021) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00514 · Cited by 123
Quantum Computation and Quantum InformationPreprint
Wang, Y. (2016) · Cited by 128
Parallel quantum simulation of large systems on small NISQ computers
Barratt, F., Dborin, J., Bal, M., Stojevic, V., Pollmann, F., & Green, A. G. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00420-3 · Cited by 111
Solvable model of the quantum spin glass in a transverse field
Goldschmidt, Y. Y. (1990) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.4858 · Cited by 111
On the Weyl functional calculus
Anderson, R. F. (1970) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1016/0022-1236(70)90050-9 · Cited by 111
Product Wave Function Renormalization Group
Nishino, T., & Okunishi, K. (1995) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.64.4084 · Cited by 111
Libra: An open-Source “methodology discovery” library for quantum and classical dynamics simulations
Akimov, A. V. (2016) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24367 · Cited by 110
Bravyi-Kitaev Superfast simulation of electronic structure on a quantum computer
Setia, K., & Whitfield, J. D. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5019371 · Cited by 118
Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and matter
Qin, W., Kockum, A. F., Muñoz, C. S., Miranowicz, A., & Nori, F. (2024) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.05.003 · Cited by 123
Parallel solver for the time-dependent linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equation
Schneider, B. I., Collins, L. A., & Hu, S. X. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.036708 · Cited by 110
Quantum annealing of the graph coloring problem
Titiloye, O., & Crispin, A. J. (2011) · Discrete Optimization · doi:10.1016/j.disopt.2010.12.001 · Cited by 109
Benchmarking the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
Willsch, M., Willsch, D., Jin, F., Raedt, H. A. D., & Michielsen, K. F. L. (2020) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · Cited by 109
A review of quantum cellular automata
Farrelly, T. (2020) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/10733 · Cited by 109
Saxena, S., & Freed, J. H. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474490 · Cited by 108
An efficient quantum algorithm for the time evolution of parameterized circuits
Barison, S., Vicentini, F., & Carleo, G. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-07-28-512 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Trotter, H. F.
- Corresponding author
- Trotter, H. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Published
- 1959-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 545-551
- ISSN
- 0002-9939 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-6826
- OpenAlex
- W1997126380
- Cited by
- 2,282
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 114 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Banach Space Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Holomorphic and Operator Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Keywords
- operator semigroups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
