The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the product of semi-groups of operators
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For this type of differential equation consisting of a sum of integrable parts, it is very natural to use a Lie-Trotter splitting approach [16,29,30], where one evolves according to each integrable part for a small time t.”
From Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“The key ingredient of TEBD-based methods is a Lie-Trotter-Suzuki [16,17] splitting of the Schrödinger equation according to the individual terms ĥi of the Hamiltonian Ĥ = i ĥi .”
From Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“If this is true, then the operator e -iHt can be implemented in terms of the corresponding operators for every term in the Hamiltonian, using the Trotter-Suzuki formula [164]:”
From The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology (2021) · cites this paper as [164]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional Analysis and Semi-groups
Hille, E., & Phillips, R. (1996) · Colloquium Publications - American Mathematical Society/Colloquium Publications · doi:10.1090/coll/031 · Cited by 4,047
Approximation of semi-groups of operators
Trotter, H. F. (1958) · Pacific Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.2140/pjm.1958.8.887 · Cited by 459
Self-citationOn the Generation of Unbounded Semi-Groups of Bounded Linear Operators
Feller, W. (1953) · Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1969826 · Cited by 62
Dye, H. A., & Phillips, R. S. (1956) · Canadian Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.4153/cjm-1956-055-1 · Cited by 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Well-conditioned multiproduct Hamiltonian simulationPreprint
Low, G. H., Kliuchnikov, V., & Wiebe, N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11679 · Cited by 30
Nielsen, L. (2014) · Acta Applicandae Mathematicae · doi:10.1007/s10440-014-9957-1 · Cited by 17
The Semiclassical Propagator in Fermionic Fock Space
Engl, T., Plößl, P., Urbina, J. D., & Richter, K. (2014) · University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) · Cited by 17
Tensor renormalization group approach to ( 1+1 )-dimensional Hubbard model
Akiyama, S., & Kuramashi, Y. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.014504 · Cited by 17
Quantum Circuits for the Preparation of Spin Eigenfunctions on Quantum Computers
Carbone, A., Galli, D. E., Motta, M., & Jones, B. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym14030624 · Cited by 18
Diffusion Monte Carlo approaches for studying nuclear quantum effects in fluxional molecules
DiRisio, R. J., Finney, J. M., & McCoy, A. B. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1615 · Cited by 17
Benchmark Phaseless Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo Method for Small Molecules
Sukurma, Z., Schlipf, M., Humer, M., Taheridehkordi, A., & Kresse, G. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00322 · Cited by 17
Potential of quantum machine learning for processing multispectral Earth observation data
Gupta, M. K., Romaszewski, M., & Gawron, P. (2025) · Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences · doi:10.24425/bpasts.2025.154279 · Cited by 19
A probabilistic quantum algorithm for imaginary-time evolution based on Taylor expansion
Yi, X., Huo, J., Liu, G., Fan, L., Zhang, R., & Cao, C. (2025) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00347-0 · Cited by 17
Geng, H.-Y. (2014) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.007 · Cited by 17
Estimation of spin-spin interaction by weak measurement scheme
Shikano, Y., & Tanaka, S. (2011) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/96/40002 · Cited by 19
Mixed time slicing in path integral simulations
Steele, R. P., Zwickl, J., Shushkov, P. G., & Tully, J. C. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3518714 · Cited by 17
Matrix product state renormalization
Bal, M., Rams, M. M., Zauner-Stauber, V., Haegeman, J., & Verstraete, F. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.205122 · Cited by 19
AcceleratingAb InitioPath Integral Simulations via Imaginary Multiple-Timestepping
Cheng, X., Herr, J. D., & Steele, R. P. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00021 · Cited by 17
Berry phase estimation in gate-based adiabatic quantum simulation
Murta, B., Catarina, G., & Fernández-Rossier, J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.020302 · Cited by 18
Prethermal quasiconserved observables in Floquet quantum systems
Yin, C., Peng, P., Huang, X., Ramanathan, C., & Cappellaro, P. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.054305 · Cited by 17
Werner, M. A., Moca, C. P., Legeza, Ö., & Zaránd, G. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.155108 · Cited by 17
Zhang, J. H., Ricard, T. C., Haycraft, C., & Iyengar, S. S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01287 · Cited by 17
Tubikanec, I., Tamborrino, M., Lánský, P., & Buckwar, E. (2021) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2021.113951 · Cited by 17
Renormalization approach to non-Markovian open-quantum-system dynamics
Gualdi, G., & Koch, C. P. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.022122 · Cited by 16
Molecular Dynamics Integration Meets Standard Theory of Molecular Vibrations
Praprotnik, M., & Janežič, D. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050168+ · Cited by 17
Obtaining a linear combination of the principal components of a matrix on quantum computers
Daskin, A. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1388-7 · Cited by 17
Random series and discrete path integral methods: The Lévy-Ciesielski implementation
Predescu, C., & Doll, J. D. (2003) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.67.026124 · Cited by 17
Drozdov, A. N. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474690 · Cited by 17
Scaling Relation for Excitation Energy under Hyperbolic Deformation
Ueda, H., Nakano, H., Kusakabe, K., & Nishino, T. (2010) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.124.389 · Cited by 17
Symplectic integrators for classical spin systems
Steinigeweg, R., & Schmidt, H. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2005.12.023 · Cited by 17
Trotter-Kato approximation theorems for locally equicontinuous semigroups (**)
Albanese, A. A. (2002) · AIRUS · Cited by 17
Unified framework for numerical methods to solve the time-dependent Maxwell equations
Raedt, H. A. D., Kole, J. S., Michielsen, K. F. L., & Figge, M. T. (2003) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(03)00414-4 · Cited by 17
Local Hamiltonians in Quantum ComputationPreprint
Nagaj, D. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0808.2117 · Cited by 31
Quantum algorithms for inverse participation ratio estimation in multiqubit and multiqudit systems
Liu, Y., Sierant, P., Stornati, P., Lewenstein, M., & Płodzień, M. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052614 · Cited by 19
The equilibrium landscape of the Heisenberg spin chain
Ilievski, E., & Quinn, E. (2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.7.3.033 · Cited by 16
Fang, S.-C., Liu, G., Lin, H.-Q., & Huang, Z. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.115135 · Cited by 16
TeNeS: Tensor network solver for quantum lattice systems
Motoyama, Y., Okubo, T., Yoshimi, K., Morita, S., Kato, T., & Kawashima, N. (2022) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108437 · Cited by 16
Mitigating the fermion sign problem by automatic differentiation
Wan, Z., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.l241109 · Cited by 16
Resolution of Electronic States in Heisenberg Cluster Models within the Unitary Group Approach
Manni, G. L., Kats, D., & Liebermann, N. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01132 · Cited by 16
Concatenation of the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code with the XZZX surface code
Zhang, J., Wu, Y.-C., & Guo, G. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062408 · Cited by 19
Amsler, M., Deglmann, P., Degroote, M., Kaicher, M., Kiser, M., Kühn, M., Kumar, C., Maier, A., Samsonidze, G. G., Schroeder, A. K., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0146934 · Cited by 27
Quantum-classical eigensolver using multiscale entanglement renormalization
Miao, Q., & Barthel, T. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033141 · Cited by 19
Demonstration of a quantum-classical coprocessing protocol for simulating nuclear reactions
Turro, F., Chistolini, T., Hashim, A., Kim, Y., Livingston, W. P., Kreikebaum, J. M., Wendt, K., DuBois, J. L., Pederiva, F., Quaglioni, S., et al. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.032417 · Cited by 17
Collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum computer with hybrid quantum-classical algorithm
Siwach, P., Harrison, K., & Balantekin, A. B. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.083039 · Cited by 23
Optimizing edge-state transfer in a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain via hybrid analog-digital strategies
Romero, S. V., Chen, X., Platero, G., & Ban, Y. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.034033 · Cited by 16
Ostmeyer, J., Nematiaram, T., Troisi, A., & Buividovich, P. V. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.l031004 · Cited by 16
Kreis, K., Kremer, K., Potestio, R., & Tuckerman, M. E. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5000701 · Cited by 16
High-Order Operator Splitting for the Bidomain and Monodomain Models
Cervi, J., & Spiteri, R. J. (2018) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/17m1137061 · Cited by 16
Zitterbewegung and bulk-edge Landau-Zener tunneling in topological insulators
Ferreira, G. J., Maciel, R. P., Penteado, P. H., & Egues, J. C. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.165120 · Cited by 15
Non-equilibrium quantum spin dynamics from classical stochastic processes
de Nicola, S., Doyon, B., & Bhaseen, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab6093 · Cited by 16
Kibble–Zurek Mechanism in a Dissipative Transverse Ising Chain
Oshiyama, H., Shibata, N., & Suzuki, S. (2020) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.89.104002 · Cited by 16
Shirakawa, T., Seki, K., & Yunoki, S. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013004 · Cited by 16
Simulating scalar field theories on quantum computers with limited resources
Li, A. C. Y., Macridin, A., Mrenna, S., & Spentzouris, P. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032603 · Cited by 16
One-Shot Decoupling and Page Curves from a Dynamical Model for Black Hole Evaporation
Brádler, K., & Adami, C. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.101301 · Cited by 16
Schlittler, T. M., Mosseri, R., & Barthel, T. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.195142 · Cited by 16
A general Trotter–Kato formula for a class of evolution operators
Vuillermot, P.-A., Wreszinski, W. F., & Zagrebnov, V. A. (2009) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2009.06.026 · Cited by 16
A third accurate operator splitting method
Jia, H., & Li, K. (2010) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.09.005 · Cited by 16
Li, X., & Iyengar, S. S. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3504167 · Cited by 16
von Neumann spin measurements with Rashba fields
Sherman, E. Y., & Sokolovski, D. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015013 · Cited by 16
Langevin Equation Path Integral Ground State
Constable, S., Schmidt, M., Ing, C. E., Zeng, T., & Roy, P. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp4015178 · Cited by 16
On Stein’s method for multivariate self-decomposable laws
Arras, B., & Houdré, C. (2019) · Electronic Journal of Probability · doi:10.1214/19-ejp378 · Cited by 16
A note on the convergence of semi-groups of operators
Hasegawa, M. (1964) · Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series A Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.3792/pja/1195522770 · Cited by 16
Accretive perturbations and error estimates for the Trotter product formula
Cachia, V., Neidhardt, H., & Zagrebnov, V. A. (2001) · Integral Equations and Operator Theory · doi:10.1007/bf01203321 · Cited by 16
Advanced quantum methods for the largest magnetic molecules
Schnack, J., & Ummethum, J. (2013) · Polyhedron · doi:10.1016/j.poly.2013.01.012 · Cited by 16
Triplet correlations in the quantum hard-sphere fluid
Sesé, L. M. (2005) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2009733 · Cited by 16
Sesé, L. M. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2718523 · Cited by 16
Electron-Phonon Superconductivity
Ćarbotte, J. P., & Marsiglio, F. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55675-3_4 · Cited by 16
Exactly solvable quantum many-body dynamics from space-time duality
Bertini, B., Claeys, P. W., & Prosen, T. (2025) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/yx73-dk86 · Cited by 49
Symplectic Integrators for Hill’s Lunar Problem
Waldvogel, J. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5510-6_20 · Cited by 15
Higher Order Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo Methods
Goth, F. (2022) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2207/1/012029 · Cited by 15
Efficient real-time path integrals for non-Markovian spin-boson models
Strathearn, A., Lovett, B. W., & Kirton, P. (2017) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 15
Towards overcoming the Monte Carlo sign problem with tensor networks
Bañuls, M. C., Cichy, K., Cirac, J. I., Jansen, K., Kühn, S., & Saito, H. (2016) · DESY (CERN, DESY, Fermilab, IHEP, and SLAC) · doi:10.1051/epjconf/201713704001/pdf · Cited by 15
Hong, C.-L., Tsai, T., Chou, J., Chen, P.-J., Tsai, P.-K., Chen, Y.-C., Kuo, E.-J., Srolovitz, D. J., Hu, A., Cheng, Y., et al. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020360 · Cited by 18
Dziarmaga, J., & Mazur, J. M. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.144510 · Cited by 17
酒井, 志. (2023) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.92.092001 · Cited by 17
Observation of a non-Hermitian supersonic mode on a trapped-ion quantum computer
Zhang, Y., Carrasquilla, J., & Kim, Y. B. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57930-3 · Cited by 21
Cook, P. D., Jammooa, D., Hjorth-Jensen, M., Lee, D. D., & Lee, D. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61362-4 · Cited by 27
Splitting K-symplectic methods for non-canonical separable Hamiltonian problems
Zhu, B., Zhang, R., Tang, Y., Tu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.044 · Cited by 15
Fast-forward Langevin dynamics with momentum flips
Hijazi, M., Wilkins, D. M., & Ceriotti, M. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5029833 · Cited by 15
SCALAR: an AMR code to simulate axion-like dark matter models
Mina, M., Mota, D. F., & Winther, H. A. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936272 · Cited by 15
Sahoo, T. K., Iouchtchenko, D., Herdman, C. M., & Roy, P. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0004602 · Cited by 15
Digital-Analog Quantum Simulation of Fermionic Models
Céleri, L. C., Huerga, D., Albarrán-Arriagada, F., Solano, E., de Andoin, M. G., & Sanz, M. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.064086 · Cited by 15
A unified framework of transformations based on the Jordan–Wigner transformation
Li, Q.-S., Liu, H., Wang, Q., Wu, Y.-C., & Guo, G. (2022) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0107546 · Cited by 16
Sesé, L. M. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4729254 · Cited by 15
Solving seismic wave propagation in elastic media using the matrix exponential approach
Kole, J. S. (2003) · Wave Motion · doi:10.1016/s0165-2125(03)00065-9 · Cited by 15
Measuring complete quantum states with a single observable
Peng, X., Du, J., & Suter, D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042117 · Cited by 15
Conformal thermal tensor network and universal entropy on topological manifolds
Chen, L., Wang, H., Wang, L., & Li, W. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.174429 · Cited by 15
Structure-Preserving Numerical Integrators for Hodgkin--Huxley-Type Systems
Chen, Z., Raman, B., & Stern, A. (2020) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/18m123390x · Cited by 15
A convergence to Brownian motion on sub-Riemannian manifolds
Gordina, M., & Laetsch, T. (2015) · Transactions of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/tran/6831 · Cited by 15
Meister, R. J., Benjamin, S. C., & Campbell, E. T. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-02-02-637 · Cited by 16
Expansion of solutions of parameterized equations and acceleration of numerical methods
Gyöngy, I., & Krylov, N. V. (2006) · Illinois Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1215/ijm/1258059483 · Cited by 15
Bulk and surface critical behavior of the three-dimensional Ising model and conformal invariance
Deng, Y., & Blöte, H. W. J. (2003) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.67.066116 · Cited by 15
A perturbation theorem for linear contraction semigroups on reflexive Banach spaces
Okazawa, N. (1971) · Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series A Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.3792/pja/1195526302 · Cited by 15
Path integral Monte Carlo simulations of silicates
Rickwardt, C., Nielaba, P., Müser, M. H., & Binder, K. (2001) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.045204 · Cited by 15
Multiplicative perturbation of nonlinear m-accretive operators
Calvert, B., & Gustafson, K. (1972) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1016/0022-1236(72)90046-8 · Cited by 15
Product Wave Function Renormalization Group: Construction from the Matrix Product Point of View
Ueda, K., Nishino, T., Okunishi, K., Hieida, Y., Derian, R., & Gendiar, A. (2006) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.75.014003 · Cited by 15
Quantum Monte Carlo simulation study of free energies and melting transitions in Coulomb solids
Iyetomi, H., Ogata, S., & Ichimaru, S. (1993) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.11703 · Cited by 15
Solution of Fokker-Planck equation using Trotter's formula
Valsakumar, M. C. (1983) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01008955 · Cited by 15
Multiscale Factorization Method for Simulating Mesoscopic Systems with Atomic PrecisionPreprint
Mansour, A. A., & Ortoleva, P. (2016) · Cited by 14
Monte Carlo Renormalization Group for Quantum Systems
Kolb, M. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.51.1696 · Cited by 15
Parametric t-stochastic neighbor embedding with quantum neural network
Kawase, Y., Mitarai, K., & Fujii, K. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043199 · Cited by 15
Restoring broken symmetries using quantum search “oracles”
Guzman, E. A. R., & Denis Lacroix, A. (2023) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.034310 · Cited by 16
Diabatic quantum annealing for the frustrated ring model
Côté, J., Sauvage, F., Larocca, M., Jonsson, M., Cincio, Ł., & Albash, T. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acfbaa · Cited by 16
Minimum Trotterization Formulas for a Time-Dependent Hamiltonian
Ikeda, T. N., Abrar, A., Chuang, I. L., & Sugiura, S. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-11-06-1168 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Trotter, H. F.
- Corresponding author
- Trotter, H. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Published
- 1959-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 545-551
- ISSN
- 0002-9939 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-6826
- OpenAlex
- W1997126380
- Cited by
- 2,282
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 114 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Banach Space Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Holomorphic and Operator Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Keywords
- operator semigroups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review