The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 15 of the 44 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Topology and data
Open accessAbstract
An important feature of modern science and engineering is that data of various kinds is being produced at an unprecedented rate. This is so in part because of new experimental methods, and in part because of the increase in the availability of high powered computing technology. It is also clear that the nature of the data we are obtaining is significantly different. For example, it is now often the case that we are given data in the form of very long vectors, where all but a few of the coordinates turn out to be irrelevant to the questions of interest, and further that we don’t necessarily know which coordinates are the interesting ones. A related fact is that the data is often very high-dimensional, which severely restricts our ability to visualize it. The data obtained is also often much noisier than in the past and has more missing information (missing data). This is particularly so in the case of biological data, particularly high throughput data from microarray or other sources. Our ability to analyze this data, both in terms of quantity and the nature of the data, is clearly not keeping pace with the data being produced. In this paper, we will discuss how geometry and topology can be applied to make useful contributions to the analysis of various kinds of data. Geometry and topology are very natural tools to apply in this direction, since geometry can be regarded as the study of distance functions, and what one often works with are distance functions on large finite sets of data. The mathematical formalism which has been developed for incorporating geometric and topological techniques deals with point clouds, i.e. finite sets of points equipped with a distance function. It then adapts tools from the various branches of geometry to the study of point clouds. The point clouds are intended to be thought of as finite samples taken from a geometric object, perhaps with noise. Here are some of the key points which come up when applying these geometric methods to data analysis. • Qualitative information is needed: One important goal of data analysis is to allow the user to obtain knowledge about the data, i.e. to understand how it is organized on a large scale. For example, if we imagine that we are looking at a data set constructed somehow from diabetes patients, it would be important to develop the understanding that there are two types of the disease, namely the juvenile and adult onset forms. Once that is established, one of course wants to develop quantitative methods for distinguishing them, but the first insight about the distinct forms of the disease is key.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
53 No basis given · 38 Own interpretation · 23 Own result · 17 No full text of the sources · 9 Supported · 5 Partly supported · 5 Sources not found · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Much of current research efforts are focused in this direction (see, e.g., [43] and [39]), and functoriality provides the right general mathematical framework for addressing them.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [43] von Luxburg, Ulrike, 2008, Consistency of spectral clustering, Ann. Statist. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction discusses questions about whether clustering algorithms converge, and Section 5.2 constructs operators for analyzing spectral clustering. Neither passage addresses functoriality or presents it as a framework for resolving ambiguities in clustering; searches for those concepts found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not matchedcites [39] kleinbergJ.M. Kleinberg, An impossibility theorem for clustering, NIPS 2002: 446-453.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We argue that, as suggested in [46], it has a role to play in the study of point cloud data as well, and we give two illustrations of how this could happen, within the context of clustering.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [46] McCullagh, Peter, 2002, What is a statistical model?, Ann. Statist. source
Section 8, “Extensive response variable” (page unavailable), describes a point process as a countable set of points and treats Poisson point-process models as natural transformations of functors. That supports the cited suggestion that functoriality could be useful for point-cloud data; the citing authors present clustering as their own proposed application. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Niyogi, Smale, and Weinberger in [52] provide sufficient hypotheses which guarantee that this is possible for Riemannian manifolds.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [52] Niyogi, Partha, 2008, Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples, Discrete Comput. Geom. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2 (Preliminaries; page unavailable) considers compact Riemannian submanifolds sampled as data. Section 3 (An Outline of Our Main Results; page unavailable) gives conditions under which the samples recover the manifold’s homology with high confidence. It does not guarantee reconstruction of the manifold itself, so the claim is broader than the result. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The result of this construction is a database M of ca.4.5 × 10 6 points on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R 8 .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [41] lee A.B. Lee, K.S. Pedersen, and D. Mumford, The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images, International Journal of Computer Vision (54), No. 1-3, August 2003, pp. 83-103. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3 (Preprocessing; page unavailable) says the preprocessed points lie on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R⁹, which is transformed into a 7-dimensional sphere in R⁸. Section 2 (Optical and Range Data Sets; page unavailable) reports about 4.2 million optical patches, not approximately 4.5 million points in a database M. The source supports the general dimensional construction, but not the stated count and geometry together. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Their method is to prove that the Čech complex associated to a covering by balls of a fixed radius is homotopy equivalent to the underlying manifold.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [52] Niyogi, Partha, 2008, Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples, Discrete Comput. Geom. source
Section 3 states that, when the sample is sufficiently dense and the ball radius meets the stated bound, the manifold is a deformation retract of the union of the balls. Section 3.1 constructs the nerve of that ball cover and invokes the Nerve Lemma because the balls are convex. Together, these support the claimed homotopy equivalence under the method’s conditions; the paper calls the nerve a simplicial complex rather than a Čech complex. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“However, it turns out that there is a classification theorem (see [64]) for a subcategory of the category of N-persistence F -vector spaces, where F is a field.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [64] Zomorodian, Afra, 2005, Computing persistent homology, Discrete Comput. Geom. source
Section 3.1 (p. 11) establishes an equivalence between finite-type persistence modules and finitely generated graded modules over R[t]. Corollary 3.1 in Section 3.2 (p. 12) then classifies the isomorphism classes of finite-type persistence modules over a field F by finite sets of P-intervals. Finite-type modules are the subcategory referred to in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In [9], such a context is developed which is not dependent on the choice of a cost function but is rather dependent on”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] memolicarlsson G. Carlsson and F. Memoli, Persistent Clustering and a Theorem of J. Kleinberg , Preprint, March 2008. source
The Discussion (p. 16) presents persistence and functoriality as organizing principles and proposes defining clustering methods through sets of constraints, rather than a chosen cost function. The Results (p. 10) explicitly compares the framework’s properties with Kleinberg’s axiomatic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It can be shown that p Σ is a homotopy equivalence (see [65]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [65] Zomorodian, Afra, 2008, Localized homology, Comput. Geom. source
Lemma 1 (global; page unavailable) states that projection from a blowup complex to the covered space is a homotopy equivalence when a simplicial complex is covered by subcomplexes. The paper uses π_X and X_U rather than pΣ and M(|Σ|,S), but states the projection result attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This notion of clustering is closely related to clique clustering algorithms in network clustering [53].”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [53] clique G. Palla, I. Derènyi, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society, Nature, Volume 435, 9 June 2005, pp. 814-818. source
The paper defines network communities through connected sets of adjacent k-cliques (p. 2) and describes an algorithm that finds cliques and clusters them using a clique-overlap matrix (p. 3). It therefore supports the citation as an example of clique-based network clustering; the comparison to the citing paper’s equivalence relation E is the citing authors’ own framing. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There is a unique M gen -functorial persistent clustering algorithm Ξ which is scale invariant and which satisfies the requirement that Ξ(E) = P .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] memolicarlsson G. Carlsson and F. Memoli, Persistent Clustering and a Theorem of J. Kleinberg , Preprint, March 2008. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- Probably not a substantial claim. 41
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although clustering is clearly a very important part of data analysis, the ways in which it is formulated and implemented are fraught with ambiguities.In particular, the arbitrariness of various threshhold choices and lack of robustness are difficulties one confronts.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [43] von Luxburg, Ulrike, 2008, Consistency of spectral clustering, Ann. Statist. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes clustering as widely used and says its consistency guarantees are unsatisfactory. The discussion following Proposition 24 shows that unnormalized spectral clustering can fail and that its reliability can be difficult to assess. These passages support the general concern about reliability, but they do not identify arbitrary threshold choices as a difficulty or establish a lack of robustness for clustering generally; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites [39] kleinbergJ.M. Kleinberg, An impossibility theorem for clustering, NIPS 2002: 446-453.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In particular, in [41], indications were found that the data was concentrated around an annulus.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [41] lee A.B. Lee, K.S. Pedersen, and D. Mumford, The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images, International Journal of Computer Vision (54), No. 1-3, August 2003, pp. 83-103. source
Section 5.1 describes the ideal-edge manifold using a circular orientation parameter and a bounded displacement parameter, giving it an annulus-like parametrization. Section 5.2 finds evidence that optical data points concentrate near that manifold. The paper does not use the word “annulus,” but the citing sentence is a reasonable, hedged paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“By using persistence, one is able to develop a systematic way of addressing such questions.That methodology has been described in [65].”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [65] Zomorodian, Afra, 2008, Localized homology, Comput. Geom. source
Section 1.2 describes a method for localizing topological attributes relative to a cover. Section 4.4 gives the persistence algorithm that computes representatives of homology classes, supplying descriptions of those attributes. Together, these passages support the paraphrase about systematically addressing where features come from. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The algorithm Ξ is the algorithm which associates to a finite metric space (X, d X ) the persistent set {π 0 (V R(X, ))} ≥0 .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] memolicarlsson G. Carlsson and F. Memoli, Persistent Clustering and a Theorem of J. Kleinberg , Preprint, March 2008. source
Example 2.1 (Section 2, p. 3) associates a finite metric space with a persistent set whose blocks at scale r contain exactly the points connected by chains of distances at most r. Those blocks are the connected components of the Vietoris–Rips complex at that scale, as the claim describes. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Also, results about barcodes under the general heading have now begun to appear (see [15] and [16]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Additional information
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [15] Cohen-Steiner, David, 2007, Stability of persistence diagrams, Discrete Comput. Geom. source
The Introduction (p. 2) says the paper makes concrete statements about the stability of barcodes. The Applications section (p. 16) states a Barcode Theorem, making this paper an example of the barcode results the citing sentence says have begun to appear. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not matchedcites [16] stabilitytwo D. Cohen-Steiner, H. Edelsbrunner, J. Harer and Y. Mileyko, Lipschitz functions have 𝐿_{𝑝}-stable persistence, Found. Comput. Math., to appear.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is readily checked that θ is a functor from N pers (Ab) to the category of graded Z[t]-modules, and is in fact an equivalence of categories, since an inverse functor can be given by M * → {M n }, where the morphisms ψ mn are given by multiplication by t n-m .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A first observation is that the points are scattered throughout the 7-sphere, in the sense that no point on S 7 is very far from the set, but that the density appears to vary a great deal.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that there are a number of short lines, and one long one.According to the philosophy mentioned above, this suggests that the first Betti number should be estimated to be one.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
hedgedstates an associationSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that in this case, there are many short segments and 5 longer segments.It is again the case that this barcode is stable over the choices of landmark points and samples from M. This suggests that the first Betti number of the putative underlying space should be five.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Primary circle
hedgedstates an associationSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that while the two smaller holes have now been “filled in”, a new hole has been introduced in the lower right-hand portion of the figure.Consequently, if we were to compute the homology of this complex, we would obtain a first Betti number of two.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the vertical circles intersect the horizontal primary circle in two points, and do not intersect each other, so the picture in question produces a natural embedding of the three circle model in the Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the β 0 barcode (the upper picture) clearly shows the single component, the β 1 shows two lines from threshhold parameter values .15 to .35, and finally the β 2 barcode shows a single line on roughly the same interval.This gives β 0 = 1, β i = 2, and β 2 = 1.These are the mod 2 Betti numbers for the Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At both scales, there is a central dense core, and two”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These two are distinguished by mod 3 homology, and we have performed the computation to show that the mod 3 homology is consistent with the Klein bottle and not with the torus.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that given only the Mapper output, one might suspect that the small feature (the array of orange nodes) could simply be an artifact, but examination of the data shows that they correspond to essentially distinct contact maps.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some experimentation with the three circle model results in the following picture in which the horizontal segments form the primary circle and the vertical segments form the secondary circles, as in the diagram.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have informally confirmed that the indicated patches are the ones which occur in the high density portions of the data set.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By far the most frequently occurring signatures were (1, 1, 0) and (1, 0, 1), corresponding to a circle and a sphere, respectively.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.5. Example: Electrode array data from primary visual cortex.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that the two secondary circles each intersect the primary circle in two points, and that they do not intersect each other.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note also that the data are obtained by simply examining the states occurring in the simulation, and that it does not include any dynamic information which would show how the states are traversed in the folding process.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The set S exhibits the three circle model clearly, but enlarging it still does not exhibit the non-trivial β 2 which would be characteristic of the Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is easy to check (a) that the factorization is a homeomorphism and (b) that the orbit space is homeomorphic to a Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A M iso -functorial clustering algorithm determines an choice p ι ∈ P G ι ι for every ι, and conversely an arbitrary choice of such p ι 's determines an M iso -functorial clustering algorithm.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of these notions creates the structure of a category whose objects are the finite metric spaces, since one can readily observe that each of the classes of morphisms is closed under composition and contains the identity.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some work in clustering theory has been done in trying to determine the optimal choice of , but it is now well understood that it is much more informative to maintain the entire dendrogram of the set, which provides a summary of the behavior of clustering under all possible values of the parameter at once.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the biological context, notions of distance are constructed using some intuitively attractive measures of similarity (such as BLAST scores or their relatives), but it is far from clear how much significance to attach to the actual distances, particularly at large scales.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Topology studies only properties of geometric objects which do not depend on the chosen coordinates, but rather on intrinsic geometric properties of the objects.As such, it is coordinate-free.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, it is understood that most of the information about topological spaces can be obtained through diagrams of discrete sets, via a process of simplicial approximation.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We then demonstrate that persistence can be generalized in several different directions, providing more structure and information about the data sets in question.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the clusterings are consistent, i.e. if the clusters in C(X 1 ) and C(X 2 ) in C(X 1 ∪ X 2 ) correspond well under these maps, then one can regard that as evidence that the subsample clusterings actually correspond to clusterings on the full data set X.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
hedgedstates an associationn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For any topological space X with a finite number of path components, β 0 (X) is the number of path components.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We begin with a discussion of persistent homology, which is a mathematical formalism which permits us to infer topological information from a sample of a geometric object, and we show how it can be applied to particular data sets arising from natural image statistics and neuroscience.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Functoriality is central in algebraic topology in that the functoriality of homological invariants is what permits one to compute them from local information, and that functoriality is at the heart of most of the interesting applications within mathematics.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We then show that the philosophy of functoriality can be used to reason about the nature of clustering methods, and we conclude by speculating about theorems one might hope to prove and discussing how the subject might develop more generally.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One important goal of data analysis is to allow the user to obtain knowledge about the data, i.e. to understand how it is organized on a large scale.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although we often receive data in the form of vectors of real numbers, it is frequently the case that the coordinates, like the metrics mentioned above, are not natural in any sense, and that therefore we should not restrict ourselves to studying properties of the data which depend on any particular choice of coordinates.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second method is more efficient, since it is precisely adapted to the complex at hand.Furthermore, it contains complete information about the original R-vector space.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In interpreting the output, one now finds that long intervals in the output barcode indicate the presence of a homology class which “persists” over a long range of parameter values, while short intervals indicate cycles which are “born” at a given parameter value and then “die” at a nearby parameter value.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is due to the fact that for finite metric spaces, it is generically the case that each value of the distance is taken only for one pair of points, so one does not have any points which are equidistant between a pair of landmarks.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intuitively, we regard these two holes as coming from faulty sampling or other errors in the recovery of the data.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=3
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The pictures and discussion above allow us to formulate the intuition that long intervals correspond to large scale geometric features in the space and that short intervals correspond to noise or inadequate sampling.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both the the Čech and Vietoris-Rips complexes typically produce simplices in dimensions much higher than the dimension of the space.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It turns out that H simp k (X, Z) is always canonically isomorphic to the singular homology of the space |X|.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Remark.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The conclusion is that for simplicial complexes, homology is algorithmically computable, although standard methods for computing Smith normal form can often be painfully slow.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Remark.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If further is sufficiently small, then all the balls will be geodesically convex, and the complex will compute the homology of M correctly.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that if the centers actually lie on a submanifold M ⊆ R n , and the set X is sufficiently dense in M , then this complex is the Čech complex attached to a covering of M .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is clearly the case that if we have 0 ≤ ≤ , then we have an inclusion W s (X, L, ) ↩→ W s (X, L, ) and similarly for W s V R , W w , and W w V R .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, for finite metric spaces, it generically produces degenerate (i.e.discrete) complexes, with no one dimensional simplices.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In rough terms, δ k for large values of k computes density using points in large neighborhoods of x, and for small values uses small neighborhoods.So, δ k for large k corresponds to a smoothed out notion of density, and for small k corresponds to a version which carries more of the detailed structure of the data set.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was observed in [38] that in an informal sense, the images in the different conditions appeared to be quite similar, and a statistical analysis strongly suggested that the behavior of V1 in the spontaneous condition was consistent with a behavior which consisted in moving through a family of evoked images corresponding to responses to angular boundaries, without any particular order.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.5. Example: Electrode array data from primary visual cortex.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] kenet T. Kenet, D. Bibitchkov, M. Tsodyks, A. Grinvald, and A. Arieli, Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes, Nature 425 (2003), 954-956. source
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This result is consistent with what was obtained by using ISOMAP in [61].”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] isomapJ.B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva and J.C. Langford, A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science 290 (2000) (December), pp. 2319-2323. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The arrays of neurons studied in [59] are from the primary visual cortex or V1 in Macaque monkeys.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.5. Example: Electrode array data from primary visual cortex.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] visionG. Singh, F. Memoli, T. Ishkhanov, G. Carlsson, G. Sapiro and D. Ringach, Topological Structure of Population Activity in Primary Visual Cortex, Journal of Vision, Volume 8, Number 8, Article 11, pp. 1-18, 2008. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since the intuition is that features which appear at several levels in such a multiresolution diagram would be more intrinsic to the data set than those which appear at a single level.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Definition 3.2.
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The core consists of normal or near-normal patients, and the two flares consist of patients with the two different forms of diabetes.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Z[m, n]-persistence vector spaces are examples of quiver representations, a highly developed area of algebra.See [29] for a complete description.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Corollary 4.6.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Gabriel, P., 1997 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These functions are clearly invariants of the isomorphism class of the module M , and we refer to them as the dimension and rank invariants, respectively.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Definition 4.3.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the question is instead whether or not an element arises from a union of k elements of S, then we do not obtain complete information this way, but we do obtain partial information in that we can preclude the possibility that a class arises from such a union.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We note that the correspondence X → π 0 (X) can actually be viewed as a functor (see [44]) from the category of topological spaces to the category of sets, in the sense that a continuous map f : X → Y induces a map of sets π 0 (f ) : π 0 (X) → π 0 (Y )”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44] Mac Lane, Saunders, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we have seen above, algebraic topology is capable of producing signatures which indicate the presence of topological features within a space.As it stands, however, it is not capable of describing the source of the feature, i.e.where in the space the hole or other feature is located.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Theorem 4.5.Let M denote any Z[m, n]-persistent F -vector space, so that every vector space V i is finite dimensional.Then there is an isomorphism”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Gabriel, P., 1997 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As Kleinberg points out, it is possible to do so in a number of different ways by specifying cost functions on particular clusterings, and prove a uniqueness result for optimal choices of clusterings with respect to this cost function”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39] kleinbergJ.M. Kleinberg, An impossibility theorem for clustering, NIPS 2002: 446-453.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This machinery is not available in the multivariable case, but it turns out that it can be replaced by the Gröbner basis methodology (see [18] or [47]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Definition 4.3.
What the sources say
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any finite Z-persistence F -vector space M can be decomposed as”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Corollary 4.6.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The properties of trees guarantee that ≤ T is a partial ordering.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the paper [59], this was shown by simulation, which is of course always an option.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] visionG. Singh, F. Memoli, T. Ishkhanov, G. Carlsson, G. Sapiro and D. Ringach, Topological Structure of Population Activity in Primary Visual Cortex, Journal of Vision, Volume 8, Number 8, Article 11, pp. 1-18, 2008. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only is the correspondence π 0 (-) a functor from spaces to sets, it is equipped with a natural surjective map of sets η X : X → π 0 (X).”
- Also stated in: § 5. Reasoning about clustering · plain
“Further, these surjective maps have the property that for every continuous map f : X → Y , the diagram of sets (below) commutes.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 5. Reasoning about clustering · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the observation is of course suggestive, to prove that it indicates structure in the data set one must show that segments of the indicated length cannot occur in a random model associated to a null hypothesis.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This means that Kleinberg's conditions also make sense in this context.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“We point out that in the context of ordinary homology (i.e.not persistent homology), M. Penrose and others have developed a theory of “geometric random graphs” and have proved various results concerning the Betti numbers of complexes attached to such graphs (see [54]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Penrose, Mathew, 2003 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is clear that a C-functorial clustering algorithm is a clustering algorithm in the sense of Kleinberg, since the surjective map of sets from X to χ(X, d X ) yields a partition of X, namely the partition whose blocks are the sets η -1 X (z), as z ranges over all elements of χ(X, d X ).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Each such interval can be considered as a point in the set D = {(x, y) ∈ R 2 |x ≤ y}, and the output is therefore a finite subset of the set D. As such, we now have a finite spatial point process (see [20], [3]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [20] Daley, D. J., 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Baddeley, Adrian, 2007, Spatial point processes and their applications source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no classification theorem for R-persistence abelian groups.
“However, we do not have such a theorem.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is still no classification theorem for graded Z[t]-modules.
“Now, there is still no classification theorem for graded Z[t]-modules.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In studying data from experiments, one typically cannot assume that the data lies along a submanifold.
“If one is interested in studying data from experiments, though, one typically cannot assume that the data lies along a submanifold.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even if one could assume that the data lies along a manifold, one is usually not in a position to verify that the stringent hypotheses of [52] are satisfied.
“Further, even if one could assume that the data lies along a manifold, one is usually not in a position to verify that the stringent hypotheses of [52] are satisfied.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The analysis of populations of neurons is amenable to geometric analysis.
“The second problem appears to be very amenable to geometric analysis, since it will involve the activities of several neurons at once.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanism by which V1 carries out low-level tasks such as edge and line detection is not understood.
“However, the mechanism by which it carries out these tasks is not understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classification of finitely generated modules over multivariable polynomial rings is much more complicated than the corresponding result for single-variable polynomial rings, and no reasonable parametrization is known.
“As is well known to algebraists, the classification of finitely generated modules over multivariable polynomial rings is much more complicated than the corresponding result for single variable polynomial rings, and in fact no reasonable parametrization is known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the case of more than one variable, the classification of multigraded modules depends on the field in question.
“examples show that in the case of more than one variable, the classification of multigraded modules definitely depends on the field in question.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classification in the multivariable case is parametrized by points in moduli varieties over the ground field.
“In fact, the classification in the multivariable case is parametrized by points in moduli varieties over the ground field”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hierarchical clustering algorithms do not report single partitions but rather dendrograms, which are roughly speaking R+-persistent sets.
“This is not an unreasonable thing to do in view of the fact that hierarchical clustering algorithms do not report single partitions but rather dendrograms, which are roughly speaking R + -persistent sets.”
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,938
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Categories for the Working Mathematician
Lane, S. M. (1971) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9839-7 · Cited by 8,982 · cited 3×
“We note that the correspondence X → π0(X) can actually be viewed as a functor (see [44]) from the category of topological spaces to the category of sets, in the sense that a continuous map f : X → Y induces a map of sets π0(f) : π0(X)→ π0(Y ), satisfying certain obvious conditions on composite maps and identity maps.”
BackgroundMethodDensity Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,569
(1975) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 5,958
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Dehnad, K., & Silverman, B. W. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269475 · Cited by 5,479
(2001) · Cited by 5,374
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- tigran G. Carlsson and T. Ishkanov, Local structure of spaces of natural images, preprint, (2007), available at http://comptop.stanford.edu/preprints/
- Dummit, David S., 2004, Abstract algebra
- Huber, Peter J., 1985, Projection pursuit, Ann. Statist., 13, 435, 10.1214/aos/1176349519 · DOI · Paper page
- Reeb, Georges, 1946, Sur les points singuliers d’une forme de Pfaff complètement intégrable ou d’une fonction numérique, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 222, 847
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,901–2,000 of 2,331
Jaccard Filtration and Stable Paths in the Mapper.Preprint
Arendt, D., Broussard, M., Krishnamoorthy, B., & Saul, N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Filtrations induced by continuous functions
Fabio, B. D., & Frosini, P. (2012) · AMS Acta (University of Bologna) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1304.1268
“Then the following statements hold: (1) α(P ) ≤ β(P ) for every P ∈ K.”
BackgroundInfluentialMultidimensional persistence in biomolecular dataPreprint
Xia, K., & Wei, G. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.7679
Approximation Algorithms for Max-Morse Matching
Rathod, A., Masood, T. B., & Natarajan, V. (2016) · NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.04707
“More recently, homology and persistent homology have been appraised to be a more widely applicable computational invariant of topological spaces, arising from practical data sets of interest [5].”
BackgroundDiscovery of statistical equivalence classes using computer algebraPreprint
Görgen, C., Bigatti, A. M., Riccomagno, E., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.09457
“This graphical representation for a set of monomials has been successfully used in the data analysis of complex systems [5, 9, 22].”
MethodMultiresolution topological simplificationPreprint
Xia, K., Zhao, Z., & Wei, G. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.00033
Multiscale Projective Coordinates via Persistent Cohomology of Sparse FiltrationsPreprint
Perea, J. A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.02861
“vided as well as theorems addressing choices in the construction. 1. Introduction Algebraic topology has emerged in the last decade as a powerful framework for analyzing complex high-dimensional data [2,3]. In this setting, a data set is interpreted as a nite subset Xof an ambient metric space (M;d); in practice M is…”
BackgroundSpectral Sequences, Exact Couples and Persistent Homology of filtrationsPreprint
Basu, S., & Parida, L. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.0801
“rvals often carry important information about the underlying data sets that give rise to the filtration, and this is why computing them is important in practice. We refer the reader to survey articles [4],[9],[14] for details regarding these applications. While spectral sequences and persistent homology were invented f…”
BackgroundCoverage statistics for sequence census methodsPreprint
Evans, S. N., Hower, V., & Pachter, L. S. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1004.5587
“Our approach is motivated by recent applications of topology including persistent homology [12,13] and the use of critical points in shape analysis [14-16].”
MethodDecomposition theory of modules: the case of Kronecker algebraPreprint
Asashiba, H., Nakashima, K., & Yoshiwaki, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.07906
“We refer the reader to [9], [4], [5] and [7] for details on persistent homology and/or topological data analysis.”
BackgroundEmmett, K., & Rabadán, R. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1219
“We provide a brief overview of TDA and persistent homology in Section 2, for additional reviews see [2][7].”
A topological approach for protein classificationPreprint
Cang, Z., Mu, L., Wu, K., et al. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.00953
“Computational homology and persistent homology have been applied to a variety of domains, including image analysis [7, 17, 53, 84, 93], chaotic dynamics verification [64, 77], sensor network [92], complex network [60, 69], data analysis [14, 73, 80, 89, 100], shape recognition [1, 41] , and computational biology [36,…”
BackgroundShape-based peak identification for ChIP-SeqPreprint
Hower, V., Evans, S. N., & Pachter, L. S. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1005.0793
“Motivated by current work in topological data analysis (TDA) [9], we determine protein binding sites based on the shape of the coverage function.”
BackgroundObjective-oriented Persistent HomologyPreprint
Wang, B., & Wei, G. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.2368
Kundu, B., & Choudhury, S. K. (2017) · International conference natural language processing
The Poincaré-Boltzmann Machine: from Statistical Physics to Machine Learning and backPreprint
Baudot, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.06486 · Cited by 3
“Topological Data Analysis: On the side of applied algebraic topology, the identification of the topological structures of dataset has motivated important researches following the development of persistent homology [81, 44, 28].”
BackgroundInfluentialTopological Run-time Monitoring for Complex SystemsPreprint
Rucco, M., Tesei, L., & Merelli, E. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.03489
“In the last decade a new suite of tools, based on algebraic topology, for data exploration and modeling haven been invented [8, 48, 17].”
BackgroundSensitivity Analysis with ManifoldsPreprint
Hernández, A., Solís, M., & Zúñiga, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Topological Stability of the Hippocampal Spatial Map and Synaptic Transience
Dabaghian, Y. A. (2021) · Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0174-3_20
“The mathematical methods required for these analyses—Persistent Homology [49–52] and Zigzag Persistent Homology theories [53–55], also outlined in [56, 57], allow building a dynamical model of the cognitive map and addressing the question “How can a rapidly rewiring network produce and sustain a stable cognitive map?””
MethodNon-Commutative Probability for the Spectral Analysis of Simplicial Complexes
de la Mora, B., & Diego, D. (2019)
Rahmani, B., & Kamberaj, H. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/779496
Probabilistic Fitting of Topological Structure to DataPreprint
Griffin, J. T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.10047
“Topological data analysis (TDA) provides tools for studying that topology [6], but as of yet there are no known methods for fitting topological structure to the distribution of the data.”
InfluentialZastosowania topologicznej analizy danych
Żuwała, A. (2017)
Manifold learning from a teacher's demonstrations.Preprint
Wang, P., Givchi, A., & Shafto, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Coarse-refinement dilemma: on generalization bounds for data clustering
Vaz, Y. (2020) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.55.2020.tde-18112020-130229
“ot true. In spite of that, homology is used in Topological Data Analysis (TDA) to study the topology of point clouds, because it does not require any assumption on the unknown underlying topology ˝ Z [18, 29]. In fact, neighborhood topologies (see Remark 1), typically based on metric spaces [28, 12], are used in TDA t…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTopologically Mapping the MacroeconomyPreprint
Dłotko, P., Rudkin, S., & Qiu, W. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.10476
“or gaining new understanding. The TDA Ball Mapper algorithm is developed by D lotko (2019a) from building blocks in Reeb and Mapper graphs1, and in persistent homology (Carlsson and Zomorodian, 2009; Carlsson, 2009). Owing to the fundamental nature of these blocks a brief oversight is oered here with the exposition fo…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInvestigating the Nonlinear Dynamics of Human Balance Using Topological Data Analysis
Siegrist, K. W., Chagdes, J. R., & Kramer, R. M. (2019) · doi:10.1115/detc2019-98014
Rucco, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Stratifications on the Ran Space
Lazovskis, J. (2021) · Order · doi:10.1007/s11083-021-09568-1
“This approach takes us directly to persistent homology [11], which combines a topological perspective at a range of distances.”
BackgroundRandom \v{C}ech complexes on $\mathbb{R}^d$: decrackling the noise with local scalingsPreprint
de Kergorlay, H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Efficient Approximation of the Matching Distance for 2-Parameter PersistencePreprint
Kerber, M., & Nigmetov, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.socg.2020.53 · Cited by 8
“Persistent homology Edelsbrunner et al. [2002], Carlsson [2009], Edelsbrunner and Harer [2010], Oudot [2015] is one of the major concepts in the quickly evolving field of topological data analysis.”
BackgroundPersistent Homotopy.Preprint
Batan, M. A., Pamuk, M., & Varlı, H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Topologically sensitive metaheuristicsPreprint
Kartelj, A., Filipović, V., Vrećica, S. T., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.11164
“Information (databases) collected from biological systems is typically less structured, and can be organized, via a concept of clustering [3] into a dynamical (filtered) simplicial complex.”
BackgroundPersistent Homology Techniques for Big Data and Machine Intelligence: A Survey
Joshi, M. A., Joshi, D., & Sharma, V. S. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1366-4_8
Hristopulos, D. T. (2020) · Advances in geographic information science · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1918-4_15
Detection and skeletonization of single neurons and tracer injections using topological methodsPreprint
Wang, D., Magee, L., Huo, B., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02755
The nudged elastic band method for effective natural image patches analysis
Cha, K., Wang, S., & Xia, S. (2020) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/1.5141451
Topological Learning for Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery
Ramirez, J., Armitage, T., Bihl, T., et al. (2019) · IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON) · doi:10.1109/naecon46414.2019.9058127
“Topological compression is concerned with developing a low-dimensional representation of the high-dimensional data that uncovers and preserves non-linear relationships among elements in the data point cloud [4]–[7].”
BackgroundMethodTopological Data Analysis of Customer Relationship
Lu, Y. (2020) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1486/5/052001
Absence of Bottlenecks in a Neural Network Determines Its Generic Functional Properties
Курочкин, С. В. (2020) · Doklady Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1064562420010160
Radius Functions on Poisson–Delaunay Mosaics and Related Complexes Experimentally
Edelsbrunner, H., Nikitenko, A., Ölsböck, K., et al. (2020) · Abel symposia · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43408-3_8
Mental Health Sensing Using Machine Learning
Taye, Y. M., Pingal, N. F., Seifu, Y. G., et al. (2020)
Persistent Homology in $\ell_{\infty}$ MetricPreprint
Beltramo, G., & Škraba, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02071
“Topological data analysis (TDA) has been the subject of intense research over the last decade [9, 11, 18].”
BackgroundTopological estimation of arbitrary unknown latent geometries of complex networksPreprint
Jhun, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Topology and Deep LearningPreprint
Hajij, M., & Istvan, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University)
$\epsilon$-net Induced Lazy Witness Complexes on GraphsPreprint
Arafat, N. A., Basu, D., & Bressan, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Ensemble Forecasting of the Zika Space-TimeSpread with Topological Data AnalysisPreprint
Soliman, M., Lyubchich, V., & Gel, Y. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.13423
“l topology, statistics, and machine learning which allows for a systematic multi-lens assessment of the underlying topology and geometry of the data generating process (Zomorodian and Carlsson, 2005; Carlsson, 2009; Chazal and Michel, 2017). In this paper, we primarily employ tools of persistent homology (PH) within t…”
MethodConstructing an Agent Taxonomy from a Simulation Through Topological Data Analysis
Swarup, S., & Rezazadegan, R. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60843-9_1
“One prominent example of such an invariant is persistent homology [1] which has been applied to studying data in various different fields.”
BackgroundA geometric view of quantum cellular automataPreprint
McDonald, J., Alsinga, P. M., & Blair, H. A. (2016)
A Sheaf and Topology Approach to Generating Local Branch Numbers in Digital ImagesPreprint
Hu, C.-S., & Chung, Y.-M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13580
“Persistent homology (PH), one of main tools in TDA, tracks changes of filtered topological spaces induced by the original objects [27, 21, 15, 25, 47, 6].”
BackgroundMorse-Based Fibering of the Persistence Rank Invariant
Bapat, A., Brooks, R., Hacker, C., Landi, C., & Mahler, B. I. (2022) · Association for Women in Mathematics series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95519-9_2
Event History and Topological Data AnalysisPreprint
Garside, K., Gjoka, A., Henderson, R., Johnson, H., & Makarenko, I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08810
Novel Topological Shapes of Model Interpretability
van Veen, H. J. (2020)
Similarity-based prediction for channel mapping and user positioningPreprint
Magoarou, L. L. (2020) · HAL
Extraction and Analysis of Spatial Correlation Micrograph Features for Traceability in Manufacturing
Dachowicz, A. P., Atallah, M. J., & Panchal, J. H. (2020) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4046891
A Topological Approach for Motion Track Discrimination
Emerson, T., Tymochko, S., Stantchev, G. M., et al. (2022) · Association for Women in Mathematics series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95519-9_9
The Topology of Neuronal Structures Exposed to Cosmic Radiation
Mihindou, A. M., & Mamouni, M. I. (2020) · WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICS · doi:10.37394/23206.2020.19.26
“, [2], [3], [17]), and that the software platform and applications offered by its machine intelligence software company Ayasdi, are the precursors of the current popularity of TDA both in the scientific and industrial communities.”
MethodTopological Deep Learning: Classification Neural NetworksPreprint
Hajij, M., & Istvan, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.08354
“Recent years have witnessed increased interest in the role topology plays in machine learning and data science [5].”
BackgroundA differential geometric approach to time series forecasting
Emami, B. (2021) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2021.126150
Convergence of persistence diagram in the subcritical regimePreprint
Owada, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Terebus, A., Manuchehrfar, F., Cao, Y., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02672
“Persistent homology provides a powerful method that can characterize topological features of high dimensional probability landscapes (Edelsbrunner et al., 2002; Carlsson, 2009).”
MethodFree Energy Estimation of Metastable Structures of Block Copolymers using Topological Data Analysis
Mototake, Y.-I., Yamanaka, S., Aoyagi, T., et al. (2020) · Journal of Computer Chemistry Japan · doi:10.2477/jccj.2021-0009
Discrete Morse theory and persistent homology
Scoville, N. A. (2019) · Student mathematical library · doi:10.1090/stml/090/06
Characterizing and Measuring the Similarity of Neural Networks with Persistent HomologyPreprint
Pérez‐Fernández, D., Gutiérrez-Fandiño, A., Armengol-Estapé, J., & Villegas, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.07752
A new construction for sublevel set persistencePreprint
Carlsson, E., & Carlsson, J. G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04020
“For other applications and references, see also [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 22].”
BackgroundBeyond “Evidence-Based” Policymaking
Iyetomi, H. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4944-1_15
$\ell^p$-Distances on Multiparameter Persistence ModulesPreprint
Bjerkevik, H. B., & Lesnick, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.13589 · Cited by 9
“In the last two decades, persistent homology has been the subject of intense interest, leading to a rich theory, highly efficient algorithms and software, and hundreds of applications [25, 56, 76, 77].”
BackgroundA Topological-Framework to Improve Analysis of Machine Learning Model PerformancePreprint
Kvinge, H., Wight, C., Akers, S. M., Howland, S., Choi, W., Ma, X., Gosink, L., Jurrus, E. R., Kappagantula, K., & Emerson, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.04714
“In the last 10 years there has been a push to find ways of applying tools from the field of topology to questions in data science (Carlsson, 2009).”
BackgroundTopological data analysis with metric learning and an application to high-dimensional football data
Meza, D. (2015) · instname:Universidad de los Andes
Jung, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01625
“Topological Data Analysis (TDA), first introduced in [53], is a geometrical method to access latent structure of the data [12].”
MethodLunaport: Math, Mechanics & Transport.Preprint
Kainen, P. C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Dong, L., Hang, H., Park, J. G., Mio, W., & Liang, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.04375
“blooming of TDA, which offers solutions to complex image and data analysis problems in diverse interdisciplinary applications [17-19].”
BackgroundAccelerating Iterated Persistent Homology Computations with Warm StartsPreprint
Luo, Y. X., & Nelson, B. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05022
“However, a variety of problems require not just the computation of persistent homology of a single large filtration but of many related filtrations - examples include feature generation for data in machine learning tasks [14, 31, 13, 27] as well as in continuous optimization problems with persistent homology included…”
BackgroundThe Sense of Shape: Discovering Spatial Features of Data with Applied Topology.
Bender, K. J. (2016) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)
Keyword Search in Large-Scale Databases with Topic Cluster Units
Wang, Y., Wang, N., & Zhou, L. (2018) · Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette · doi:10.17559/tv-20160419053402
“According to the mathematical properties of Gaussian function, for a given σ , if node v i is out of the influence scope ( 3 ) of node v j , the topology compactness between them attenuates to zero rapidly [17, 18].”
BackgroundTowards Robust Perception Using Topological Invariants.
Banerjee, R., Liu, F., & Ke, P. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Kochar, Y., Vengalil, S. K., & Sinha, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01572
“For example the study in [1] shows that the image patches obtained from natural images follow the topology of a Klein bottle.”
BackgroundMethodWang, R., Chen, J., & Wei, G. (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.04626
Topologically Regularized Data EmbeddingsPreprint
Vandaele, R., Kang, B., Lijffijt, J., Bie, T. D., & Saeys, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.09193 · Cited by 7
“Topological optimization is performed through a topological loss function evaluated on one or more persistence diagrams (Barannikov, 1994; Carlsson, 2009).”
MethodThe Generalized Persistence Diagram Encodes the Bigraded Betti NumbersPreprint
Kim, W., & Moore, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Topological Regularization for Dense PredictionPreprint
Fu, D., & Nelson, B. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.10984
“For surveys of of persistent homology which provide broader context and additional detail see [32], [33], and for additional background on computing persistent homology see [34].”
BackgroundAsymptotic Improvements on the Exact Matching Distance for 2-parameter Persistence
Bjerkevik, H. B., & Kerber, M. (2021) · Journal of computational geometry · doi:10.20382/jocg.v14i1a12 · Cited by 1
“The last 20 years have witnessed numerous applications of persistent homology in various scientific fields, including neuroscience [2, 34, 35], material science [21, 28], cosmology [33, 37], and many others, shaping the field of topological data analysis [6].”
BackgroundEurolandia al bivio: o noi o la Germania
Borghi, C. (2012)
Report on scipost_202102_00007v2
Spitz, D., Berges, J., Oberthaler, M. K., et al. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.3454
(2016) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119072492.refs
Ludu, A. (2016) · Springer series in synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49078-5_1
Kodama, H., & Nakata, Y. (2021) · Theoretical biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7132-6_5
TDAExplore: Quantitative Image Analysis Through Topology-Based Machine LearningPreprint
Edwards, P. B., Skruber, K., Milićević, N., Heidings, J. B., Read, T., Bubenik, P., & Vitriol, E. A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3878412
Klemelä, J. (2009) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470425671.refs
Investigating the Nonlinear Dynamics of Human Balance Using Topological Data Analysis
Siegrist, K. W., Kramer, R. M., & Chagdes, J. R. (2020) · Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1115/1.4047937
Report on scipost_202102_00007v1
Spitz, D., Berges, J., Oberthaler, M. K., et al. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.2838
Big Data Models and the Public Sector
Sona, N. N. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7501-6.ch007
Kamberaj, H. (2020) · Scientific computation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35702-3_7
Report on scipost_202102_00007v1
Spitz, D., Berges, J., Oberthaler, M. K., et al. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.2534
Emergencia global del ecosistema financiero computacional
Erazo, O. M. G. (2020) · Repositorio Institucional (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana) · doi:10.11144/javeriana.10554.51450
Topological Data Analysis - A Novel and Effective Approach for Feature Extraction
Joshi, D., Nagwanshi, K. K., Choubey, N. S., et al. (2022) · Proceedings in adaptation, learning and optimization · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97196-0_41
Formation of Machine Learning Features Based on the Construction of Tropical Functions
Chukanov, S. N., & Чуканов, И. С. (2022) · Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems · doi:10.18255/1818-1015-2022-3-200-209
On PI-Net deep learning model for classification of images
Haddad, A., Majd, B. A. E., & Bennis, D. (2022) · International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA) · doi:10.1109/icoa55659.2022.9934351
“The idea of persistent homology is to compute homology at many scales and observe which topological features persist across those scales ( [11], [12]).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlsson, G.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carlsson, Gunnar
- ORCID
- Carlsson, Gunnar
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Published
- 2009-01-29
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-308
- ISSN
- 0002-9904 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-9485
- 0273-0979
- OpenAlex
- W1991566301
- Cited by
- 2,302
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 215 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 215 · 2020: 227 · 2019: 151 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 132 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 33.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0354543)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Keywords
- point clouds, distance measures, high-dimensional data, biological data, microarray data, high-throughput data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review