Cited by 540Advanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchStatistical Methods and InferenceBayesian Methods and Mixture Models

Consistency of spectral clustering

Open access
von Luxburg, Ulrike, Belkin, Mikhail, Bousquet, Olivier·2008·The Annals of Statistics

Abstract

Consistency is a key property of all statistical procedures analyzing randomly sampled data. Surprisingly, despite decades of work, little is known about consistency of most clustering algorithms. In this paper we investigate consistency of the popular family of spectral clustering algorithms, which clusters the data with the help of eigenvectors of graph Laplacian matrices. We develop new methods to establish that, for increasing sample size, those eigenvectors converge to the eigenvectors of certain limit operators. As a result, we can prove that one of the two major classes of spectral clustering (normalized clustering) converges under very general conditions, while the other (unnormalized clustering) is only consistent under strong additional assumptions, which are not always satisfied in real data. We conclude that our analysis provides strong evidence for the superiority of normalized spectral clustering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/009053607000000640

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clustering is fraught with ambiguities, including arbitrariness of threshold choices and lack of robustness.

    “Although clustering is clearly a very important part of data analysis, the ways in which it is formulated and implemented are fraught with ambiguities.In particular, the arbitrariness of various threshhold choices and lack of robustness are difficulties one confronts.”

    From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Introduction describes clustering as widely used and says its consistency guarantees are unsatisfactory. The discussion following Proposition 24 shows that unnormalized spectral clustering can fail and that its reliability can be difficult to assess. These passages support the general concern about reliability, but they do not identify arbitrary threshold choices as a difficulty or establish a lack of robustness for clustering generally; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Functoriality provides the right general mathematical framework for addressing ambiguities in clustering.

    “Much of current research efforts are focused in this direction (see, e.g., [43] and [39]), and functoriality provides the right general mathematical framework for addressing them.”

    From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Introduction discusses questions about whether clustering algorithms converge, and Section 5.2 constructs operators for analyzing spectral clustering. Neither passage addresses functoriality or presents it as a framework for resolving ambiguities in clustering; searches for those concepts found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]38. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
  2. [52]52. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Luxburg, U., Belkin, M., & Bousquet, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
The Annals of Statistics
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
555-586
ISSN
  • 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8966
OpenAlex
W2002276939
Cited by
540
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 25
FWCI
41.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Keywords
spectral clustering, consistency, graph Laplacian, eigenvector convergence, limit operators, random sampling, large-sample asymptotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review