The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 15 of the 44 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Topology and data
Open accessAbstract
An important feature of modern science and engineering is that data of various kinds is being produced at an unprecedented rate. This is so in part because of new experimental methods, and in part because of the increase in the availability of high powered computing technology. It is also clear that the nature of the data we are obtaining is significantly different. For example, it is now often the case that we are given data in the form of very long vectors, where all but a few of the coordinates turn out to be irrelevant to the questions of interest, and further that we don’t necessarily know which coordinates are the interesting ones. A related fact is that the data is often very high-dimensional, which severely restricts our ability to visualize it. The data obtained is also often much noisier than in the past and has more missing information (missing data). This is particularly so in the case of biological data, particularly high throughput data from microarray or other sources. Our ability to analyze this data, both in terms of quantity and the nature of the data, is clearly not keeping pace with the data being produced. In this paper, we will discuss how geometry and topology can be applied to make useful contributions to the analysis of various kinds of data. Geometry and topology are very natural tools to apply in this direction, since geometry can be regarded as the study of distance functions, and what one often works with are distance functions on large finite sets of data. The mathematical formalism which has been developed for incorporating geometric and topological techniques deals with point clouds, i.e. finite sets of points equipped with a distance function. It then adapts tools from the various branches of geometry to the study of point clouds. The point clouds are intended to be thought of as finite samples taken from a geometric object, perhaps with noise. Here are some of the key points which come up when applying these geometric methods to data analysis. • Qualitative information is needed: One important goal of data analysis is to allow the user to obtain knowledge about the data, i.e. to understand how it is organized on a large scale. For example, if we imagine that we are looking at a data set constructed somehow from diabetes patients, it would be important to develop the understanding that there are two types of the disease, namely the juvenile and adult onset forms. Once that is established, one of course wants to develop quantitative methods for distinguishing them, but the first insight about the distinct forms of the disease is key.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
53 No basis given · 38 Own interpretation · 23 Own result · 17 No full text of the sources · 9 Supported · 5 Partly supported · 5 Sources not found · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Much of current research efforts are focused in this direction (see, e.g., [43] and [39]), and functoriality provides the right general mathematical framework for addressing them.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [43] von Luxburg, Ulrike, 2008, Consistency of spectral clustering, Ann. Statist. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction discusses questions about whether clustering algorithms converge, and Section 5.2 constructs operators for analyzing spectral clustering. Neither passage addresses functoriality or presents it as a framework for resolving ambiguities in clustering; searches for those concepts found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not matchedcites [39] kleinbergJ.M. Kleinberg, An impossibility theorem for clustering, NIPS 2002: 446-453.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We argue that, as suggested in [46], it has a role to play in the study of point cloud data as well, and we give two illustrations of how this could happen, within the context of clustering.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [46] McCullagh, Peter, 2002, What is a statistical model?, Ann. Statist. source
Section 8, “Extensive response variable” (page unavailable), describes a point process as a countable set of points and treats Poisson point-process models as natural transformations of functors. That supports the cited suggestion that functoriality could be useful for point-cloud data; the citing authors present clustering as their own proposed application. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Niyogi, Smale, and Weinberger in [52] provide sufficient hypotheses which guarantee that this is possible for Riemannian manifolds.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [52] Niyogi, Partha, 2008, Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples, Discrete Comput. Geom. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2 (Preliminaries; page unavailable) considers compact Riemannian submanifolds sampled as data. Section 3 (An Outline of Our Main Results; page unavailable) gives conditions under which the samples recover the manifold’s homology with high confidence. It does not guarantee reconstruction of the manifold itself, so the claim is broader than the result. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The result of this construction is a database M of ca.4.5 × 10 6 points on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R 8 .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [41] lee A.B. Lee, K.S. Pedersen, and D. Mumford, The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images, International Journal of Computer Vision (54), No. 1-3, August 2003, pp. 83-103. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3 (Preprocessing; page unavailable) says the preprocessed points lie on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R⁹, which is transformed into a 7-dimensional sphere in R⁸. Section 2 (Optical and Range Data Sets; page unavailable) reports about 4.2 million optical patches, not approximately 4.5 million points in a database M. The source supports the general dimensional construction, but not the stated count and geometry together. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Their method is to prove that the Čech complex associated to a covering by balls of a fixed radius is homotopy equivalent to the underlying manifold.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [52] Niyogi, Partha, 2008, Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples, Discrete Comput. Geom. source
Section 3 states that, when the sample is sufficiently dense and the ball radius meets the stated bound, the manifold is a deformation retract of the union of the balls. Section 3.1 constructs the nerve of that ball cover and invokes the Nerve Lemma because the balls are convex. Together, these support the claimed homotopy equivalence under the method’s conditions; the paper calls the nerve a simplicial complex rather than a Čech complex. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“However, it turns out that there is a classification theorem (see [64]) for a subcategory of the category of N-persistence F -vector spaces, where F is a field.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [64] Zomorodian, Afra, 2005, Computing persistent homology, Discrete Comput. Geom. source
Section 3.1 (p. 11) establishes an equivalence between finite-type persistence modules and finitely generated graded modules over R[t]. Corollary 3.1 in Section 3.2 (p. 12) then classifies the isomorphism classes of finite-type persistence modules over a field F by finite sets of P-intervals. Finite-type modules are the subcategory referred to in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In [9], such a context is developed which is not dependent on the choice of a cost function but is rather dependent on”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] memolicarlsson G. Carlsson and F. Memoli, Persistent Clustering and a Theorem of J. Kleinberg , Preprint, March 2008. source
The Discussion (p. 16) presents persistence and functoriality as organizing principles and proposes defining clustering methods through sets of constraints, rather than a chosen cost function. The Results (p. 10) explicitly compares the framework’s properties with Kleinberg’s axiomatic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It can be shown that p Σ is a homotopy equivalence (see [65]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [65] Zomorodian, Afra, 2008, Localized homology, Comput. Geom. source
Lemma 1 (global; page unavailable) states that projection from a blowup complex to the covered space is a homotopy equivalence when a simplicial complex is covered by subcomplexes. The paper uses π_X and X_U rather than pΣ and M(|Σ|,S), but states the projection result attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This notion of clustering is closely related to clique clustering algorithms in network clustering [53].”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [53] clique G. Palla, I. Derènyi, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society, Nature, Volume 435, 9 June 2005, pp. 814-818. source
The paper defines network communities through connected sets of adjacent k-cliques (p. 2) and describes an algorithm that finds cliques and clusters them using a clique-overlap matrix (p. 3). It therefore supports the citation as an example of clique-based network clustering; the comparison to the citing paper’s equivalence relation E is the citing authors’ own framing. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There is a unique M gen -functorial persistent clustering algorithm Ξ which is scale invariant and which satisfies the requirement that Ξ(E) = P .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] memolicarlsson G. Carlsson and F. Memoli, Persistent Clustering and a Theorem of J. Kleinberg , Preprint, March 2008. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- Probably not a substantial claim. 41
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although clustering is clearly a very important part of data analysis, the ways in which it is formulated and implemented are fraught with ambiguities.In particular, the arbitrariness of various threshhold choices and lack of robustness are difficulties one confronts.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [43] von Luxburg, Ulrike, 2008, Consistency of spectral clustering, Ann. Statist. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes clustering as widely used and says its consistency guarantees are unsatisfactory. The discussion following Proposition 24 shows that unnormalized spectral clustering can fail and that its reliability can be difficult to assess. These passages support the general concern about reliability, but they do not identify arbitrary threshold choices as a difficulty or establish a lack of robustness for clustering generally; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites [39] kleinbergJ.M. Kleinberg, An impossibility theorem for clustering, NIPS 2002: 446-453.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In particular, in [41], indications were found that the data was concentrated around an annulus.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [41] lee A.B. Lee, K.S. Pedersen, and D. Mumford, The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images, International Journal of Computer Vision (54), No. 1-3, August 2003, pp. 83-103. source
Section 5.1 describes the ideal-edge manifold using a circular orientation parameter and a bounded displacement parameter, giving it an annulus-like parametrization. Section 5.2 finds evidence that optical data points concentrate near that manifold. The paper does not use the word “annulus,” but the citing sentence is a reasonable, hedged paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“By using persistence, one is able to develop a systematic way of addressing such questions.That methodology has been described in [65].”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [65] Zomorodian, Afra, 2008, Localized homology, Comput. Geom. source
Section 1.2 describes a method for localizing topological attributes relative to a cover. Section 4.4 gives the persistence algorithm that computes representatives of homology classes, supplying descriptions of those attributes. Together, these passages support the paraphrase about systematically addressing where features come from. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The algorithm Ξ is the algorithm which associates to a finite metric space (X, d X ) the persistent set {π 0 (V R(X, ))} ≥0 .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] memolicarlsson G. Carlsson and F. Memoli, Persistent Clustering and a Theorem of J. Kleinberg , Preprint, March 2008. source
Example 2.1 (Section 2, p. 3) associates a finite metric space with a persistent set whose blocks at scale r contain exactly the points connected by chains of distances at most r. Those blocks are the connected components of the Vietoris–Rips complex at that scale, as the claim describes. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Also, results about barcodes under the general heading have now begun to appear (see [15] and [16]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Additional information
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [15] Cohen-Steiner, David, 2007, Stability of persistence diagrams, Discrete Comput. Geom. source
The Introduction (p. 2) says the paper makes concrete statements about the stability of barcodes. The Applications section (p. 16) states a Barcode Theorem, making this paper an example of the barcode results the citing sentence says have begun to appear. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not matchedcites [16] stabilitytwo D. Cohen-Steiner, H. Edelsbrunner, J. Harer and Y. Mileyko, Lipschitz functions have 𝐿_{𝑝}-stable persistence, Found. Comput. Math., to appear.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is readily checked that θ is a functor from N pers (Ab) to the category of graded Z[t]-modules, and is in fact an equivalence of categories, since an inverse functor can be given by M * → {M n }, where the morphisms ψ mn are given by multiplication by t n-m .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A first observation is that the points are scattered throughout the 7-sphere, in the sense that no point on S 7 is very far from the set, but that the density appears to vary a great deal.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that there are a number of short lines, and one long one.According to the philosophy mentioned above, this suggests that the first Betti number should be estimated to be one.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that in this case, there are many short segments and 5 longer segments.It is again the case that this barcode is stable over the choices of landmark points and samples from M. This suggests that the first Betti number of the putative underlying space should be five.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Primary circle
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that while the two smaller holes have now been “filled in”, a new hole has been introduced in the lower right-hand portion of the figure.Consequently, if we were to compute the homology of this complex, we would obtain a first Betti number of two.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the vertical circles intersect the horizontal primary circle in two points, and do not intersect each other, so the picture in question produces a natural embedding of the three circle model in the Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the β 0 barcode (the upper picture) clearly shows the single component, the β 1 shows two lines from threshhold parameter values .15 to .35, and finally the β 2 barcode shows a single line on roughly the same interval.This gives β 0 = 1, β i = 2, and β 2 = 1.These are the mod 2 Betti numbers for the Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At both scales, there is a central dense core, and two”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These two are distinguished by mod 3 homology, and we have performed the computation to show that the mod 3 homology is consistent with the Klein bottle and not with the torus.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that given only the Mapper output, one might suspect that the small feature (the array of orange nodes) could simply be an artifact, but examination of the data shows that they correspond to essentially distinct contact maps.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some experimentation with the three circle model results in the following picture in which the horizontal segments form the primary circle and the vertical segments form the secondary circles, as in the diagram.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have informally confirmed that the indicated patches are the ones which occur in the high density portions of the data set.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By far the most frequently occurring signatures were (1, 1, 0) and (1, 0, 1), corresponding to a circle and a sphere, respectively.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.5. Example: Electrode array data from primary visual cortex.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that the two secondary circles each intersect the primary circle in two points, and that they do not intersect each other.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note also that the data are obtained by simply examining the states occurring in the simulation, and that it does not include any dynamic information which would show how the states are traversed in the folding process.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The set S exhibits the three circle model clearly, but enlarging it still does not exhibit the non-trivial β 2 which would be characteristic of the Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is easy to check (a) that the factorization is a homeomorphism and (b) that the orbit space is homeomorphic to a Klein bottle.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Three circle model in the data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A M iso -functorial clustering algorithm determines an choice p ι ∈ P G ι ι for every ι, and conversely an arbitrary choice of such p ι 's determines an M iso -functorial clustering algorithm.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of these notions creates the structure of a category whose objects are the finite metric spaces, since one can readily observe that each of the classes of morphisms is closed under composition and contains the identity.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some work in clustering theory has been done in trying to determine the optimal choice of , but it is now well understood that it is much more informative to maintain the entire dendrogram of the set, which provides a summary of the behavior of clustering under all possible values of the parameter at once.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the biological context, notions of distance are constructed using some intuitively attractive measures of similarity (such as BLAST scores or their relatives), but it is far from clear how much significance to attach to the actual distances, particularly at large scales.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Topology studies only properties of geometric objects which do not depend on the chosen coordinates, but rather on intrinsic geometric properties of the objects.As such, it is coordinate-free.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, it is understood that most of the information about topological spaces can be obtained through diagrams of discrete sets, via a process of simplicial approximation.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We then demonstrate that persistence can be generalized in several different directions, providing more structure and information about the data sets in question.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the clusterings are consistent, i.e. if the clusters in C(X 1 ) and C(X 2 ) in C(X 1 ∪ X 2 ) correspond well under these maps, then one can regard that as evidence that the subsample clusterings actually correspond to clusterings on the full data set X.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
hedgedcorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For any topological space X with a finite number of path components, β 0 (X) is the number of path components.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We begin with a discussion of persistent homology, which is a mathematical formalism which permits us to infer topological information from a sample of a geometric object, and we show how it can be applied to particular data sets arising from natural image statistics and neuroscience.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Functoriality is central in algebraic topology in that the functoriality of homological invariants is what permits one to compute them from local information, and that functoriality is at the heart of most of the interesting applications within mathematics.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We then show that the philosophy of functoriality can be used to reason about the nature of clustering methods, and we conclude by speculating about theorems one might hope to prove and discussing how the subject might develop more generally.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One important goal of data analysis is to allow the user to obtain knowledge about the data, i.e. to understand how it is organized on a large scale.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although we often receive data in the form of vectors of real numbers, it is frequently the case that the coordinates, like the metrics mentioned above, are not natural in any sense, and that therefore we should not restrict ourselves to studying properties of the data which depend on any particular choice of coordinates.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second method is more efficient, since it is precisely adapted to the complex at hand.Furthermore, it contains complete information about the original R-vector space.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In interpreting the output, one now finds that long intervals in the output barcode indicate the presence of a homology class which “persists” over a long range of parameter values, while short intervals indicate cycles which are “born” at a given parameter value and then “die” at a nearby parameter value.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is due to the fact that for finite metric spaces, it is generically the case that each value of the distance is taken only for one pair of points, so one does not have any points which are equidistant between a pair of landmarks.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intuitively, we regard these two holes as coming from faulty sampling or other errors in the recovery of the data.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=3
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The pictures and discussion above allow us to formulate the intuition that long intervals correspond to large scale geometric features in the space and that short intervals correspond to noise or inadequate sampling.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 1=2
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both the the Čech and Vietoris-Rips complexes typically produce simplices in dimensions much higher than the dimension of the space.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It turns out that H simp k (X, Z) is always canonically isomorphic to the singular homology of the space |X|.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Remark.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The conclusion is that for simplicial complexes, homology is algorithmically computable, although standard methods for computing Smith normal form can often be painfully slow.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Remark.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If further is sufficiently small, then all the balls will be geodesically convex, and the complex will compute the homology of M correctly.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that if the centers actually lie on a submanifold M ⊆ R n , and the set X is sufficiently dense in M , then this complex is the Čech complex attached to a covering of M .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.3. Persistent homology.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is clearly the case that if we have 0 ≤ ≤ , then we have an inclusion W s (X, L, ) ↩→ W s (X, L, ) and similarly for W s V R , W w , and W w V R .”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, for finite metric spaces, it generically produces degenerate (i.e.discrete) complexes, with no one dimensional simplices.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.2. Building coverings and complexes.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In rough terms, δ k for large values of k computes density using points in large neighborhoods of x, and for small values uses small neighborhoods.So, δ k for large k corresponds to a smoothed out notion of density, and for small k corresponds to a version which carries more of the detailed structure of the data set.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.4. Example: Natural image statistics.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was observed in [38] that in an informal sense, the images in the different conditions appeared to be quite similar, and a statistical analysis strongly suggested that the behavior of V1 in the spontaneous condition was consistent with a behavior which consisted in moving through a family of evoked images corresponding to responses to angular boundaries, without any particular order.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.5. Example: Electrode array data from primary visual cortex.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] kenet T. Kenet, D. Bibitchkov, M. Tsodyks, A. Grinvald, and A. Arieli, Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes, Nature 425 (2003), 954-956. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This result is consistent with what was obtained by using ISOMAP in [61].”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] isomapJ.B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva and J.C. Langford, A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science 290 (2000) (December), pp. 2319-2323. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The arrays of neurons studied in [59] are from the primary visual cortex or V1 in Macaque monkeys.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 2.5. Example: Electrode array data from primary visual cortex.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] visionG. Singh, F. Memoli, T. Ishkhanov, G. Carlsson, G. Sapiro and D. Ringach, Topological Structure of Population Activity in Primary Visual Cortex, Journal of Vision, Volume 8, Number 8, Article 11, pp. 1-18, 2008. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since the intuition is that features which appear at several levels in such a multiresolution diagram would be more intrinsic to the data set than those which appear at a single level.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Definition 3.2.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The core consists of normal or near-normal patients, and the two flares consist of patients with the two different forms of diabetes.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 3.5. Examples.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Z[m, n]-persistence vector spaces are examples of quiver representations, a highly developed area of algebra.See [29] for a complete description.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Corollary 4.6.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Gabriel, P., 1997 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These functions are clearly invariants of the isomorphism class of the module M , and we refer to them as the dimension and rank invariants, respectively.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Definition 4.3.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the question is instead whether or not an element arises from a union of k elements of S, then we do not obtain complete information this way, but we do obtain partial information in that we can preclude the possibility that a class arises from such a union.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We note that the correspondence X → π 0 (X) can actually be viewed as a functor (see [44]) from the category of topological spaces to the category of sets, in the sense that a continuous map f : X → Y induces a map of sets π 0 (f ) : π 0 (X) → π 0 (Y )”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44] Mac Lane, Saunders, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we have seen above, algebraic topology is capable of producing signatures which indicate the presence of topological features within a space.As it stands, however, it is not capable of describing the source of the feature, i.e.where in the space the hole or other feature is located.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Theorem 4.5.Let M denote any Z[m, n]-persistent F -vector space, so that every vector space V i is finite dimensional.Then there is an isomorphism”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Example.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Gabriel, P., 1997 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As Kleinberg points out, it is possible to do so in a number of different ways by specifying cost functions on particular clusterings, and prove a uniqueness result for optimal choices of clusterings with respect to this cost function”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39] kleinbergJ.M. Kleinberg, An impossibility theorem for clustering, NIPS 2002: 446-453.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This machinery is not available in the multivariable case, but it turns out that it can be replaced by the Gröbner basis methodology (see [18] or [47]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Definition 4.3.
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any finite Z-persistence F -vector space M can be decomposed as”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Corollary 4.6.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The properties of trees guarantee that ≤ T is a partial ordering.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 4.3. Tree based persistence.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the paper [59], this was shown by simulation, which is of course always an option.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] visionG. Singh, F. Memoli, T. Ishkhanov, G. Carlsson, G. Sapiro and D. Ringach, Topological Structure of Population Activity in Primary Visual Cortex, Journal of Vision, Volume 8, Number 8, Article 11, pp. 1-18, 2008. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only is the correspondence π 0 (-) a functor from spaces to sets, it is equipped with a natural surjective map of sets η X : X → π 0 (X).”
- Also stated in: § 5. Reasoning about clustering · plain
“Further, these surjective maps have the property that for every continuous map f : X → Y , the diagram of sets (below) commutes.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 5. Reasoning about clustering · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the observation is of course suggestive, to prove that it indicates structure in the data set one must show that segments of the indicated length cannot occur in a random model associated to a null hypothesis.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This means that Kleinberg's conditions also make sense in this context.”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“We point out that in the context of ordinary homology (i.e.not persistent homology), M. Penrose and others have developed a theory of “geometric random graphs” and have proved various results concerning the Betti numbers of complexes attached to such graphs (see [54]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Penrose, Mathew, 2003 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is clear that a C-functorial clustering algorithm is a clustering algorithm in the sense of Kleinberg, since the surjective map of sets from X to χ(X, d X ) yields a partition of X, namely the partition whose blocks are the sets η -1 X (z), as z ranges over all elements of χ(X, d X ).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > 5. Reasoning about clustering
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Each such interval can be considered as a point in the set D = {(x, y) ∈ R 2 |x ≤ y}, and the output is therefore a finite subset of the set D. As such, we now have a finite spatial point process (see [20], [3]).”
§ TOPOLOGY AND DATA GUNNAR CARLSSON > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [20] Daley, D. J., 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Baddeley, Adrian, 2007, Spatial point processes and their applications source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no classification theorem for R-persistence abelian groups.
“However, we do not have such a theorem.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is still no classification theorem for graded Z[t]-modules.
“Now, there is still no classification theorem for graded Z[t]-modules.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In studying data from experiments, one typically cannot assume that the data lies along a submanifold.
“If one is interested in studying data from experiments, though, one typically cannot assume that the data lies along a submanifold.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even if one could assume that the data lies along a manifold, one is usually not in a position to verify that the stringent hypotheses of [52] are satisfied.
“Further, even if one could assume that the data lies along a manifold, one is usually not in a position to verify that the stringent hypotheses of [52] are satisfied.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The analysis of populations of neurons is amenable to geometric analysis.
“The second problem appears to be very amenable to geometric analysis, since it will involve the activities of several neurons at once.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanism by which V1 carries out low-level tasks such as edge and line detection is not understood.
“However, the mechanism by which it carries out these tasks is not understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classification of finitely generated modules over multivariable polynomial rings is much more complicated than the corresponding result for single-variable polynomial rings, and no reasonable parametrization is known.
“As is well known to algebraists, the classification of finitely generated modules over multivariable polynomial rings is much more complicated than the corresponding result for single variable polynomial rings, and in fact no reasonable parametrization is known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the case of more than one variable, the classification of multigraded modules depends on the field in question.
“examples show that in the case of more than one variable, the classification of multigraded modules definitely depends on the field in question.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classification in the multivariable case is parametrized by points in moduli varieties over the ground field.
“In fact, the classification in the multivariable case is parametrized by points in moduli varieties over the ground field”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hierarchical clustering algorithms do not report single partitions but rather dendrograms, which are roughly speaking R+-persistent sets.
“This is not an unreasonable thing to do in view of the fact that hierarchical clustering algorithms do not report single partitions but rather dendrograms, which are roughly speaking R + -persistent sets.”
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,938
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Categories for the Working Mathematician
Lane, S. M. (1971) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9839-7 · Cited by 8,982 · cited 3×
“We note that the correspondence X → π0(X) can actually be viewed as a functor (see [44]) from the category of topological spaces to the category of sets, in the sense that a continuous map f : X → Y induces a map of sets π0(f) : π0(X)→ π0(Y ), satisfying certain obvious conditions on composite maps and identity maps.”
BackgroundMethodDensity Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,569
(1975) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 5,958
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Dehnad, K., & Silverman, B. W. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269475 · Cited by 5,479
(2001) · Cited by 5,374
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- tigran G. Carlsson and T. Ishkanov, Local structure of spaces of natural images, preprint, (2007), available at http://comptop.stanford.edu/preprints/
- Dummit, David S., 2004, Abstract algebra
- Huber, Peter J., 1985, Projection pursuit, Ann. Statist., 13, 435, 10.1214/aos/1176349519 · DOI · Paper page
- Reeb, Georges, 1946, Sur les points singuliers d’une forme de Pfaff complètement intégrable ou d’une fonction numérique, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 222, 847
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 2,331
Machine Learning for Health Informatics
Holzinger, A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50478-0_1 · Cited by 62
Decomposition of persistence modules
Botnan, M. B., & Crawley-Boevey, W. (2019) · Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/proc/14790 · Cited by 60
“e say that M is pointwise finite-dimensional if each Mx is finite dimensional. Thework inthispaperisinspired bytopologicaldataanalysis (TDA). For an introduction to TDA, see e.g. the survey by Carlsson [5], or the recent book by Oudot [12] on quiver representations and TDA. Let X be a topological space, h: X →Ra continu…”
BackgroundPrinciples and open questions in functional brain network reconstruction
Korhonen, O., Zanin, M., & Papo, D. (2021) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25462 · Cited by 59
“tional topology (Carlsson, 2009; Edelsbrunner & Harer, 2010; Petri et al., 2014; Reimann et al., 2017; Stolz, 2014; Zomorodian, 2005) or statistical physics (Bianconi & Rahmede, 2016), and explanations at various levels (Marr, 1982) and of different types (Illari &”
BackgroundSFCM: A Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm of Extracting the Shape Information of Data
Bui, Q., Vo, B., Snåšel, V., Pedrycz, W., Hong, T., Nguyên, N. T., & Chen, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3014662 · Cited by 60
“In TDA, a summary or a compressed representation of all data features is created to help rapidly uncover data characteristics [7], [8].”
BackgroundSaggar, M., Shine, J. M., Liégeois, R., Dosenbach, N. U. F., & Fair, D. A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32381-2 · Cited by 65
Stability of synchronization in simplicial complexes with multiple interaction layers
Anwar, M. S., & Ghosh, D. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.106.034314 · Cited by 61
Object-oriented persistent homology
Wang, B., & Wei, G. (2015) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.036 · Cited by 50
“In the past few years, persistent homology has been applied to image analysis [5,9,58,67], image retrieval [30], chaotic dynamics verification [42,49], sensor networks [66], complex networks [40,45], data analysis [8,47,53,60,73], computer vision [67], shape recognition [24] and computational biology [21,31,43,86].”
BackgroundGeniesse, C., Sporns, O., Petri, G., & Saggar, M. (2019) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00093 · Cited by 57
“…data; represents the underlying structure as a combinatorial object (i.e., graph), whose topological properties can be easily quantified; and provides coordinate and deformation invariance properties, making it suitable for examining within and between participants’ data (Carlsson, 2009).”
InfluentialIdentification of relevant genetic alterations in cancer using topological data analysis
Rabadán, R., Mohamedi, Y., Rubin, U., Chu, T., Alghalith, A. N., Elliott, O., Arnes, L., Cal, S., Obaya, Á. J., Levine, A. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17659-7 · Cited by 56
Promises and pitfalls of topological data analysis for brain connectivity analysis
Caputi, L., Pidnebesna, A., & Hlinka, J. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118245 · Cited by 62
A functorial Dowker theorem and persistent homology of asymmetric networks
Chowdhury, S., & Mémoli, F. (2018) · Journal of Applied and Computational Topology · doi:10.1007/s41468-018-0020-6 · Cited by 75
“Remark 18 (The metric space setting and relation to witness complexes) When restricted to the setting ofmetric spaces, theDowker complex resembles a construction called the witness complex (De Silva and Carlsson 2004). In particular, a version of the Dowker complex for metric spaces, constructed in terms of landmarks…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBinchi, J., Merelli, E., Rucco, M., Petri, G., & Vaccarino, F. (2014) · Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2014.06.011 · Cited by 54
A Klein-Bottle-Based Dictionary for Texture Representation
Perea, J. A., & Carlsson, G. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0676-2 · Cited by 53
“2 we review the results from Lee et al. (2003) and Carlsson et al. (2008) on the Klein bottle model K , and discuss how the methods from computational topology (Carlsson 2009) can be used to model low-dimensional subspaces of pixel-value space, parametrizing sets of relevant patches.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTopological data analysis for the string landscape
Cole, A., & Shiu, G. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2019)054 · Cited by 60
Searching the landscape of flux vacua with genetic algorithms
Cole, A., Schachner, A., & Shiu, G. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)045 · Cited by 76
“To understand these results further, we use persistent homology to analyze the topological structure of the distribution in flux space, applying the methods used in [25, 104], see also [105–110] for more elaborate introductions.”
MethodSubsampling Methods for Persistent HomologyPreprint
Chazal, F., Fasy, B. T., Lecci, F., Michel, B., Rinaldo, A., & Wasserman, L. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1901 · Cited by 70
Landslide topology uncovers failure movements
Bhuyan, K., Rana, K., Ferrer, J. V., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46741-7 · Cited by 56
“Below are the point-by-point responses to the reviewer’s comments.”
BackgroundTopological methods for genomics: Present and future directions
Cámara, P. G. (2016) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2016.12.007 · Cited by 55
“For a more technical introduction to TDA (not necessarily in the context of genomics), the reader may also consider [4 e 7].”
BackgroundMethodChainNet: Learning on Blockchain Graphs with Topological Features
Abay, N. C., Akçora, C. G., Gel, Y. R., et al. (2019) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2019.00105 · Cited by 56
“TDA is an emerging field at the intersection of algebraic topology and computational geometry providing methods to systematically study the topological and geometric structure underlying data [6, 7].”
BackgroundMethodAnnotated hypergraphs: models and applications
Chodrow, P. S., & Mellor, A. (2020) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-020-0252-y · Cited by 56
Simplicial Neural NetworksPreprint
Ebli, S., Defferrard, M., & Spreemann, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03633 · Cited by 113
“The advance of topological methods in machine learning [11, 12, 13], and the earlier establishment of topological data analysis (TDA) [14, 15, 16, 17] as a field in its own right, have confirmed the usefulness of viewing data as topological spaces in general, or in particular as simplicial complexes.”
BackgroundScalable algorithms for physics-informed neural and graph networks
Shukla, K., Xu, M., Trask, N., et al. (2022) · Data-Centric Engineering · doi:10.1017/dce.2022.24 · Cited by 55
“Unstructured data do, however, encode nontrivial topological information regarding connectivity, allowing application of ideas from topological data analysis and combinatorial Hodge theory (Wasserman, 2018; Bubenik et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 2011; Carlsson, 2009).”
BackgroundA Population Background for Nonparametric Density-Based Clustering
Chacón, J. E. (2015) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/15-sts526 · Cited by 56
“Finally, the idea of examining the evolution of the cluster structure as the density level varies is closely related with the topic of persistent homology, a tool from Computational Topology that, since its relatively recent introduction, has attracted a great deal of interest for its applications in Topological Data…”
MethodFabio, B. D., & Landi, C. (2011) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-011-9100-x · Cited by 47
“Surveys on persistent homology include those by Edelsbrunner and Harer [9] and Carlsson [2].”
BackgroundEfficient map reconstruction and augmentation via topological methods
Wang, S., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2015) · ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL GIS) · doi:10.1145/2820783.2820833 · Cited by 55
“See the original paper introducing the concept in [11], and books and surveys e.g, [6, 9, 10].”
BackgroundDo weak global stresses synchronize earthquakes?
Bendick, R. O., & Bilham, R. G. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl074934 · Cited by 53
Searching the landscape of flux vacua with genetic algorithms
Cole, A., Schachner, A., & Shiu, G. (2019) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.17863/cam.79204 · Cited by 59
A hands-on tutorial on network and topological neuroscience
Centeno, E. G. Z., Moreni, G., Vriend, C., Douw, L., & Santos, F. A. N. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02435-0 · Cited by 55
“TDA generally uses topology and geometry methods to study the shape of the data (Carlsson 2009).”
MethodShape-based peak identification for ChIP-Seq
Hower, V., Evans, S. N., & Pachter, L. S. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-15 · Cited by 54
“Motivated by current work in topological data analysis (TDA) [9], we determine protein binding sites based on the shape of the coverage function.”
BackgroundStratifying Multiparameter Persistent Homology
Harrington, H. A., Otter, N., Schenck, H., & Tillmann, U. (2019) · SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry · doi:10.1137/18m1224350 · Cited by 52
“the one-parameter case. 1. Introduction Persistent homology was introduced about 15 years ago, and has become a standard tool in the analysis of datasets with complicated structure; for overviews see [5], [14], [20], [35], and [25] for an introduction to computations. Persistent homology (PH) has been successful in at…”
MethodTopological Approaches to Deep Learning
Carlsson, G., & Gabrielsson, R. B. (2020) · Abel symposia · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43408-3_5 · Cited by 65
Self-citationTopological clustering of multilayer networks
Yuvaraj, M., Dey, A. K., Lyubchich, V., Gel, Y. R., & Poor, H. V. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2019994118 · Cited by 54
“The objective is to detect features which are long-lived (or persistent) over varying thresholds (32, 67, 68).”
BackgroundAnatomy of perturbed traffic networks during urban flooding
Rajput, A. A., Nayak, S., Dong, S., et al. (2023) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104693 · Cited by 53
Jiao, Y., Shen, G., Lin, Y., & Huang, J. (2023) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/23-aos2266 · Cited by 98
Topological Data Analysis in Graph Neural Networks: Surveys and Perspectives
Pham, P., Bui, Q., Nguyen, N. T., Kozma, R., Yu, P. S., & Vo, B. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3520147 · Cited by 59
“TDA [26] is a powerful tool for gaining deeper geometric and topological insights into data, making it valuable for complex data analysis and mining.”
Topological methods reveal high and low functioning neuro‐phenotypes within fragile X syndrome
Romano, D., Nicolau, M., Quintin, E., Mazaika, P. K., Lightbody, A. A., Hazlett, H. C., Piven, J., Carlsson, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22521 · Cited by 52
“…shtml.) To investigate putative phenotypic subgroups within FXS as captured by MRI data, we employed topological data analysis (TDA) [Carlsson, 2009], a recently-developed approach that is specifically designed to identify structural characteristics of high-dimensional datasets.”
InfluentialSelf-citationTopological control for 2D minimum compliance topology optimization using SIMP method
Wang, Q., Han, H., Wang, C., et al. (2022) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-021-03124-6 · Cited by 52
“Persistent Homology (PH) is a method used in topological data analysis to study the qualitative features of data that persist across multiple scales (Otter et al., 2017; Fugacci et al., 2016; Carlsson, 2009, 2020; H. Edelsbrunner and Harer, 2008).”
MethodTurkay, Ç., Jeanquartier, F., Holzinger, A., & Hauser, H. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43968-5_7 · Cited by 54
“Top end research routes encompassing uncountable research challenges are in the application of computational topology [27], [113], [114] approaches for data visualization.”
BackgroundPersistent homology of attractors for action recognition
Venkataraman, V., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Turaga, P. K. (2016) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2016.7533141 · Cited by 53
“In the past decade, topological data analysis (TDA) has shown to be a promising new paradigm for analyzing and deriving inferences [1].”
BackgroundConsistent manifold representation for topological data analysis
Berry, T., & SAUER, T. D. (2019) · Foundations of Data Science · doi:10.3934/fods.2019001 · Cited by 53
“Despite these drawbacks, the simplicity of these two graph constructions has led to their widespread use in manifold learning and topological data analysis methods [4].”
BackgroundIndexing 3D Scenes Using the Interaction Bisector Surface
Zhao, X., Wang, H., & Komura, T. (2014) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2574860 · Cited by 50
“Formally, the k-th Betti number refers to the number of independent kdimensional surfaces [Carlsson 2009].”
BackgroundInformatics and machine learning to define the phenotype
Basile, A. O., & Ritchie, M. D. (2018) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2018.1439380 · Cited by 51
“recognition within large, multidimensional datasets [49,50].”
giotto-tda: A Topological Data Analysis Toolkit for Machine Learning and Data Exploration
Tauzin, G., Lupo, U., Tunstall, L., et al. (2020) · ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02551 · Cited by 51
“Topological Data Analysis (TDA) uses tools from algebraic and combinatorial topology to extract features that capture the shape of data [1].”
MethodLIMIT THEORY FOR POINT PROCESSES IN MANIFOLDS
Penrose, M. D., & Yukich, J. E. (2013) · Cited by 49
Topological Complexity of Smooth Random Functions
Adler, R. J., & Taylor, J. (2011) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19580-8 · Cited by 51
“Gunnar Carlsson’s webpage [19], which describes a large Stanford TDA (topological data analysis) project, and a DARPA webpage [25] describing a broad based project, also help explain the reasons why so many people have been so attracted to this direction.”
BackgroundStatistical Topological Data Analysis - a Kernel Perspective
Kwitt, R. (2015) · mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) · Cited by 54
Persistence-based clustering in riemannian manifolds
Chazal, F., Guibas, L. J., Oudot, S., & Škraba, P. (2011) · Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG) · doi:10.1145/1998196.1998212 · Cited by 48
Topological analysis of tapped granular media using persistent homology
Ardanza-Trevijano, S., Zuriguel, I., Arévalo, R., et al. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.052212 · Cited by 50
Topological Data Analysis Generates High-Resolution, Genome-wide Maps of Human Recombination
Cámara, P. G., Rosenbloom, D. I. S., Emmett, K., Levine, A. J., & Rabadán, R. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.05.008 · Cited by 50
“Motivated by the fact that actual data are rarely given in the form of topological spaces, recent mathematical developments have expanded the realm of algebraic topology to point cloud data, that is, any set of data points with a notion of distance between them (Carlsson, 2009).”
Pore Geometry Characterization by Persistent Homology Theory
Jiang, F., Tsuji, T., & Shirai, T. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2017wr021864 · Cited by 50
“Recently, topological data analysis (TDA) (Carlsson, 2009; Edelsbrunner & Harer, 2010) has been applied to extract useful information from complicated physical and biological data (Kurtuldu et al., 2011; Hiraoka et al., 2016; Hirata et al., 2013; Nakamura et al., 2015; Nicolau et al., 2011; Tsuji…”
MethodInfluentialTopological Analysis of Variance and the Maxillary Complex
Heo, G., Gamble, J., & Kim, P. T. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2011.641430 · Cited by 49
“Survey articles on this topic can be found in Edelsbrunner and Harer (2008) and Carlsson (2009), while a motivational overview of the topic was provided by Ghrist (2008), see also Adler et al. (2010).”
BackgroundConvergence Rates for Persistence Diagram Estimation in Topological Data Analysis
Chazal, F., Glisse, M., Labruère, C., & Michel, B. (2014) · HAL · doi:10.5555/2789272.2912112 · Cited by 71
“For a complete definition of these geometric filtered complexes built on top of metric spaces and their use in TDA, we refer to Chazal et al. (2012b), Section 4.2.”
InfluentialTopological portraits of multiscale coordination dynamics
Zhang, M., Kalies, W. D., Kelso, J. A. S., & Tognoli, E. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108672 · Cited by 49
“In practice, persistent homology (Zomorodian and Carlsson, 2005; Carlsson, 2009; Ghrist, 2007) is a natural choice for computing such a multiscale topological portrait.”
Comprehensive machine and deep learning analysis of sensor-based human activity recognition
Balaha, H. M., & Hassan, A. E.-S. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-023-08374-7 · Cited by 52
“Topological Data Analysis (TDA) is an approach of datasets analysis using topological techniques [112].”
MethodTopological Localization Via Signals of Opportunity
Robinson, M., & Ghrist, R. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2012.2187518 · Cited by 49
Interpatient Similarities in Cardiac Function
Tokodi, M., Shrestha, S., Bianco, C. M., Kagiyama, N., Casaclang‐Verzosa, G., Narula, J., & Sengupta, P. P. (2020) · JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.018 · Cited by 49
“This allows us to summarize the complex data to a simple connected patient similarity network that can be visualized to attain novel insights into disease mechanisms (5,6).”
BackgroundTopological obstructions to autoencoding
Batson, J., Haaf, C. G., Kahn, Y. F., & Roberts, D. A. (2021) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 48
Topological analysis of differential effects of ketamine and propofol anaesthesia on brain dynamics
Varley, T. F., Denny, V. C., Sporns, O., & Patania, A. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.201971 · Cited by 48
“More recently, topology has been applied in data analysis to help describe and classify noisy or high-dimensional data, for example by extracting topological invariants present in complex data sets [7, 44, 46].”
Hardness Results for Homology Localization
Chen, C., & Freedman, D. (2011) · Discrete & Computational Geometry · doi:10.1007/s00454-010-9322-8 · Cited by 45
Data segmentation based on the local intrinsic dimension
Allegra, M., Facco, E., Denti, F., Laio, A., & Mira, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72222-0 · Cited by 1
Blockchain networks: Data structures of Bitcoin, Monero, Zcash, Ethereum, Ripple, and Iota
Akçora, C. G., Gel, Y. R., & Kantarcıoğlu, M. (2021) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1436 · Cited by 48
“Anotheremergingpromisingapproach for ransomware payment detection is topological data analysis (TDA) [30, 31].”
BackgroundContinuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF): improving the assessment and classification of MPN patients
Ryou, H., Sirinukunwattana, K., Aberdeen, A., Grindstaff, G., Stolz, B. J., Byrne, H. M., Harrington, H. A., Sousos, N., Godfrey, A. L., Harrison, C. N., et al. (2022) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01773-0 · Cited by 52
Efficient and robust persistent homology for measures
Buchet, M., Chazal, F., Oudot, S., & Sheehy, D. R. (2016) · Computational Geometry · doi:10.1016/j.comgeo.2016.07.001 · Cited by 45
“The flagship tool in topological data analysis is persistent homology and the most common goal is to apply the persistence algorithm to distance functions, either in Euclidean space or in metric spaces [2, 16, 25].”
MethodTopological data analysis in investment decisions
Goel, A., Pasricha, P., & Mehra, A. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113222 · Cited by 48
HiDeF: identifying persistent structures in multiscale ‘omics data
Zheng, F., Zhang, S., Churas, C., Pratt, D. R., Bahar, İ., & Ideker, T. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02228-4 · Cited by 46
Chung, Y.-M., Hu, C.-S., Lo, Y., & Wu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.637684 · Cited by 54
“Topological data analysis (TDA) is a data analysis framework based on tools from algebraic topology (Carlsson, 2009; Epstein et al., 2011).”
MethodCrackle: The Homology of Noise
Adler, R. J., Bobrowski, O., & Weinberger, S. (2014) · Discrete & Computational Geometry · doi:10.1007/s00454-014-9621-6 · Cited by 42
“[8,10–12]).”
Machine learning topological phases in real space
Holanda, N. L., & Griffith, M. A. R. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.054107 · Cited by 50
Machine Learning Prediction on Properties of Nanoporous Materials Utilizing Pore Geometry Barcodes
Zhang, X., Cui, J., Zhang, K., Wu, J., & Lee, Y. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00623 · Cited by 50
Fractional Norms and Quasinorms Do Not Help to Overcome the Curse of Dimensionality
Mirkes, E. M., Allohibi, J., & Gorban, A. N. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22101105 · Cited by 58
“pproach uses the complexes with vertices in data points: just connect the points with distance less than "for variable "and receive an object of combinatorial topology, a simplicial complex [53]. All these methods use an object embedded into a dataspace. They are called Injective Methods [54]. Additionally,…”
MethodParametric Inference using Persistence Diagrams: A Case Study in Population GeneticsPreprint
Emmett, K., Rosenbloom, D. I. S., Cámara, P. G., & Rabadán, R. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.4582 · Cited by 47
“For detailed background, see the reviews (Carlsson, 2009; Ghrist, 2008) and the books (Edelsbrunner & Harer, 2010; Zomorodian, 2005).”
BackgroundMatroid Filtrations and Computational Persistent HomologyPreprint
Henselman, G., & Ghrist, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.socg.2023.60 · Cited by 47
BitcoinHeist: Topological Data Analysis for Ransomware Detection on the Bitcoin BlockchainPreprint
Akçora, C. G., Li, Y., Gel, Y. R., & Kantarcıoğlu, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.07852 · Cited by 49
“In this paper, we employ the Mapper method of [35], [5] which is a highly customizable TDA tool allowing for a systematic multi-resolution glimpse into organization and functionality behind the underlying data generating process.”
BackgroundMethodPokorny, F. T., Hawasly, M., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2015) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364915586713 · Cited by 46
“Another direction of future research will be an investigation of alternative simplicial complexes, such as Vietoris-Rips and (weak) witness complexes (Carlsson, 2009) which approximate Xr and which could be used to mitigate the ‘curse of dimensionality’ in higher dimensions to some extent.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPersistence Modules on Commutative Ladders of Finite Type
Escolar, E. G., & Hiraoka, Y. (2015) · Discrete & Computational Geometry · doi:10.1007/s00454-015-9746-2 · Cited by 52
“This situation often occurs in TDA when we already know the 2-step persistence module MX = H (Xr ) → H (Xs) very well and investigate several inputs {Y (i)r ⊂ Y (i)s | i = 1, . . . , a} that are not well understood by using MX as a reference.”
BackgroundInfluentialMachine Learning in Materials Chemistry: An Invitation
Packwood, D. M., Nguyen, L. T. H., Cesana, P., Zhang, G., Staykov, A., Fukumoto, Y., & Nguyễn, Đ. H. (2022) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100265 · Cited by 48
Physics informed and data-based augmented learning in structural health diagnosis
Lorenzo, D. D., Champaney, V., Marzin, J. Y., Farhat, C., & Chinesta, F. (2023) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116186 · Cited by 44
Multiresolution persistent homology for excessively large biomolecular datasets
Xia, K., Zhao, Z., & Wei, G. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4931733 · Cited by 38
Persistent topology for cryo‐EM data analysis
Xia, K., & Wei, G. (2015) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.2719 · Cited by 36
Tropical Coordinates on the Space of Persistence Barcodes
Kališnik, S. (2018) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-018-9379-y · Cited by 69
“In the past two decades, with the emergence of ‘big data,’ topology started playing a more prominent role in data analysis [5,6].”
BackgroundBounds on spectral norms and barcodes
Kislev, A., & Shelukhin, E. (2021) · Geometry & Topology · doi:10.2140/gt.2021.25.3257 · Cited by 42
“ersistence modules and boundary depth. We recall brie y the category pmod of persistence modules that we work with, together with their relevant properties. For detailed treatment of these topics see [12, 22, 23, 34, 49, 121]. Let K be a eld. A persistence module over K is a pair (V;ˇ) where, fVtg t2R is a family of n…”
BackgroundCasey, M. J., Stumpf, P. S., & MacArthur, B. D. (2019) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1471 · Cited by 43
“…future though, and it is likely that advances in single-cell profiling methods that produce more finely detailed, and less noisy data, in combination with developments in topological data analysis (Carlsson, 2009) will soon allow us to identify more complex dynamics from single-cell profiling data.”
Learning algebraic varieties from samples
Breiding, P., Kališnik Verovšek, S., Sturmfels, B., & Weinstein, M. (2018) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 42
Consensus on simplicial complexes: Results on stability and synchronization
DeVille, L. (2021) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0037433 · Cited by 45
“sets are also active. The study of simplicial complexes has a long history in mathematics [42,57,67] and underpin many modern tools in algebraic topology. The recent field of topological data analysis [20,21,74,89] has the goal of using tools from algebraic topology to understand complex datasets — in particular, the s…”
BackgroundTriboinformatics: machine learning algorithms and data topology methods for tribology
Hasan, M. S., & Nosonovsky, M. (2022) · Surface Innovations · doi:10.1680/jsuin.22.00027 · Cited by 53
Deep learning and synthetic media
Millière, R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03739-2 · Cited by 54
Multivariate Data Analysis Using Persistence-Based Filtering and Topological Signatures
Rieck, B., Mara, H., & Leitte, H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.248 · Cited by 42
“Furthermore, as Carlsson [1] remarks, topological methods are less sensitive to the choice of metrics and depend on intrinsic geometric properties of data sets.”
BackgroundInfluentialPersistent Homology and Materials Informatics
Buchet, M., Hiraoka, Y., & Obayashi, I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7617-6_5 · Cited by 44
“In this simplicial complex, the simplex of highest dimension is the 2 -simplex, a.k.a. triangle, [1 , 2 , 3] .”
BackgroundMethodDemonstration of topological data analysis on a quantum processor
Huang, H.-L., Wang, X., Rohde, P. P., Luo, Y.-H., Zhao, Y., Liu, C., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2018) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.5.000193 · Cited by 47
Learning Representations of Persistence Barcodes
Hofer, C. D., Kwitt, R., & Niethammer, M. (2019) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 49
F-Mapper: A Fuzzy Mapper clustering algorithm
Bui, Q., Vo, B., Nguyen, H.-A. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., & Snåšel, V. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105107 · Cited by 44
Random partial paired comparison for subjective video quality assessment via hodgerank
Xu, Q., Jiang, T., Yao, Y., et al. (2011) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/2072298.2072350 · Cited by 44
“For more details of persistent homology, readers may refer to the surveys in [7, 10].”
BackgroundClustering Comparison of Point Processes, with Applications to Random Geometric Models
Błaszczyszyn, B., & Yogeshwaran, D. (2014) · Lecture notes in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10064-7_2 · Cited by 43
“om geometric graphs. Random geometric graphs on Poisson or Binomial point processes is a well-researched subject with many applications (see [37]). Motivated by research in topological data analysis ([9,18]) and relying on results from random geometric graphs, random geometric complexes on Poisson or Binomial point pr…”
BackgroundTopological Data Analysis for Image Tampering Detection
Asaad, A., & Jassim, S. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64185-0_11 · Cited by 43
“These three important properties of topology have been discussed in detail in [7, 8].”
BackgroundThe topology of data: opportunities for cancer research
Loughrey, C. F., Fitzpatrick, P., Orr, N., & Jurek, A. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab553 · Cited by 44
“Short-lived features are generally considered noise while long-lived features are considered robust features of the dataset (Carlsson, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the distribution of the critical values of random spherical harmonicsPreprint
Cammarota, V., Marinucci, D., & Wigman, I. (2014) · Cited by 43
Persistent Homology Machine Learning for Fingerprint Classification
Giansiracusa, N., Giansiracusa, R., & Moon, C. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2019.00201 · Cited by 42
“Persistent homology algorithms have been implemented in a variety of software packages (cf. [16]); we use the R package called “TDA” [17].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLow Bias Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation from Expected Simplex Skewness
Johnsson, K., Soneson, C., & Fontes, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2343220 · Cited by 41
Guo, W., & Banerjee, A. G. (2017) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.015 · Cited by 42
Exposition and Interpretation of the Topology of Neural Networks
Gabrielsson, R. B., & Carlsson, G. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2019.00180 · Cited by 63
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlsson, G.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carlsson, Gunnar
- ORCID
- Carlsson, Gunnar
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society
- Publisher
- American Mathematical Society (AMS)
- Published
- 2009-01-29
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-308
- ISSN
- 0002-9904 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-9485
- 0273-0979
- OpenAlex
- W1991566301
- Cited by
- 2,302
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 215 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 215 · 2020: 227 · 2019: 151 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 132 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 33.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0354543)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Keywords
- point clouds, distance measures, high-dimensional data, biological data, microarray data, high-throughput data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review