The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Osteopontin as a Novel Ligand for the Integrin α8β1 and Potential Roles for This Integrin–Ligand Interaction in Kidney Morphogenesis
Open accessAbstract
Epithelio–mesenchymal interactions during kidney organogenesis are disrupted in integrin α8β1-deficient mice. However, the known ligands for integrin α8β1—fibronectin, vitronectin, and tenascin-C—are not appropriately localized to mediate all α8β1 functions in the kidney. Using a method of general utility for determining the distribution of unknown integrin ligands in situ and biochemical characterization of these ligands, we identified osteopontin (OPN) as a ligand for α8β1. We have coexpressed the extracellular domains of the mouse α8 and β1 integrin subunits as a soluble heterodimer with one subunit fused to alkaline phosphatase (AP) and have used the α8β1-AP chimera as a histochemical reagent on sections of mouse embryos. Ligand localization with α8β1-AP in developing bone and kidney was observed to be overlapping with the distribution of OPN. In “far Western” blots of mouse embryonic protein extracts, bands were detected with sizes corresponding to fibronectin, vitronectin, and unknown proteins, one of which was identical to the size of OPN. In a solid-phase binding assay we demonstrated that purified OPN binds specifically to α8β1-AP. Cell adhesion assays using K562 cells expressing α8β1 were used to confirm this result. Together with a recent report that anti-OPN antibodies disrupt kidney morphogenesis, our results suggest that interactions between OPN and integrin α8β1 may help regulate kidney development and other morphogenetic processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wolfsberg, T. G., Primakoff, P., Myles, D. G., & White, J. M. (1995) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.131.2.275 · Cited by 502
Cited by
Gong, Y., Chang, L., Viola, K. L., Lacor, P. N., Lambert, M. P., Finch, C. E., Krafft, G. A., & Klein, W. L. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1834302100 · Cited by 1,061
Osteopontin: role in immune regulation and stress responses
Wang, K. X., & Denhardt, D. T. (2008) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.08.001 · Cited by 669
Mesenchymal stem cells: key players in cancer progression
Ridge, S. M., Sullivan, F. J., & Glynn, S. A. (2017) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0597-8 · Cited by 526
The role of osteopontin in inflammatory processes
Lund, S. A., Giachelli, C. M., & Scatena, M. (2009) · Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1007/s12079-009-0068-0 · Cited by 516
Osteopontin expression and function: Role in bone remodeling
Denhardt, D. T., & Noda, M. (1998) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(1998)72:30/31+<92::aid-jcb13>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Denda, S., Reichardt, L. F., & Müller, U.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1425-1435
- ISSN
- 1059-1524 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4586
- OpenAlex
- W2109868881
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Osteopontin as a Novel Ligand for the Integrin α8β1 and Potential Roles for This Integrin–Ligand Interaction in Kidney Morphogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1091/mbc.9.6.1425
- The paper
- Denda, S., Reichardt, L. F., & Müller, U. (1998). Identification of Osteopontin as a Novel Ligand for the Integrin α8β1 and Potential Roles for This Integrin–Ligand Interaction in Kidney Morphogenesis. Molecular Biology of the Cell. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.9.6.1425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.