The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association with Membrane Protrusions Makes ErbB2 an Internalization-resistant Receptor
Open accessAbstract
In contrast to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, ErbB2 is known to remain at the plasma membrane after ligand binding and dimerization. However, why ErbB2 is not efficiently down-regulated has remained elusive. Basically, two possibilities exist: ErbB2 is internalization resistant or it is efficiently recycled after internalization. By a combination of confocal microscopy, immunogold labeling electron microscopy, and biochemical techniques we show that ErbB2 is preferentially associated with membrane protrusions. Moreover, it is efficiently excluded from clathrin-coated pits and is not seen in transferrin receptor-containing endosomes. This pattern is not changed after binding of EGF, heregulin, or herceptin. The exclusion from coated pits is so pronounced that it cannot just be explained by lack of an internalization signal. Although ErbB2 is a raft-associated protein, the localization of ErbB2 to protrusions is not a result of raft binding. Also, an intact actin cytoskeleton is not required for keeping ErbB2 away from coated pits. However, after efficient cross-linking, ErbB2 is removed from protrusions to occur on the bulk membrane, in coated pits, and in endosomes. These data show that ErbB2 is a remarkably internalization-resistant receptor and suggest that the mechanism underlying the firm association of ErbB2 with protrusions also is the reason for this resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional rafts in cell membranes
Simons, K., & Ikonen, E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42408 · Cited by 9,757
Cited by
Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent
Jiang, W., Kim, B. Y. S., Rutka, J. T., & Chan, W. C. W. (2008) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.30 · Cited by 2,776
Active targeting of gold nanoparticles as cancer therapeutics
Goddard, Z. R., Marín, M. J., Russell, D. A., & Searcey, M. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01121e · Cited by 282
Cao, Z., Wu, X., Yen, L., Sweeney, C., & Carraway, K. L. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01245-06 · Cited by 119
Caveolae: Stable Membrane Domains with a Potential for Internalization
Hommelgaard, A. M., Roepstorff, K., Vilhardt, F., Torgersen, M. L., Sandvig, K., & van Deurs, B. (2005) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00314.x · Cited by 112
Self-citationSORLA regulates endosomal trafficking and oncogenic fitness of HER2
Pietilä, M., Sahgal, P., Peuhu, E., Jäntti, N. Z., Paatero, I., Närvä, E., Al-Akhrass, H., Lilja, J., Georgiadou, M., Andersen, O. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10275-0 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Hommelgaard, A. M., Lerdrup, M., & van Deurs, B.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1557-1567
- ISSN
- 1059-1524 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4586
- OpenAlex
- W2107022635
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association with Membrane Protrusions Makes ErbB2 an Internalization-resistant Receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1091/mbc.e03-08-0596
- The paper
- Hommelgaard, A. M., Lerdrup, M., & van Deurs, B. (2004). Association with Membrane Protrusions Makes ErbB2 an Internalization-resistant Receptor. Molecular Biology of the Cell. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e03-08-0596
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.