Cited by 2,494Game Theory and ApplicationsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma

Kreps, David M, Milgrom, Paul, Roberts, John, Wilson, Robert·1982·Journal of Economic Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This has been shown theoretically (Kreps et al. 1982) and experimentally (Gächter and Falk, forthcoming).

    “This has been shown theoretically (Kreps et al. 1982) and experimentally (Gächter and Falk, forthcoming).”

    From Psychological foundations of incentives (2002) · cites this paper as Kreps et al. 1982

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-08
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
245-252
ISSN
0022-0531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123850572
Cited by
2,494
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 125
FWCI
23.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Economic Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
finitely repeated games, prisoner's dilemma, cooperation, incomplete information, commitment, tit-for-tat, Nash equilibrium, bounded rationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review