The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Econometrics: Alchemy or Science?: Essays in Econometric Methodology
Abstract
This collection of published papers records the development of an approach to econometric modelling that has reached a highly successful stage. The methodology of modelling ‘observational data’, as opposed to experimental data, which can be replicated, is analysed to highlight the fundamental flaws in various approaches, and the possibilities of others. Criteria for model adequacy are formulated (congruence and encompassing), and alternative approaches to building empirical models are compared on their ability to deliver such models. A typology of models elucidates their properties, and a taxonomy of information sources clarifies testing. Estimation is summarized by an estimator generating equation. The value of exploring the development path is to reveal by attempted applications why many widely used approaches are inadequate. The outcome is to demonstrate the viability of a general‐to‐specific approach that commences from a specification deemed more than adequate to characterize the evidence, and simplifies to a parsimonious representation that captures the main factors. By artificial Monte Carlo simulations on experiments designed by others, the success of that approach is established, leading to automatic model selection by software that can outperform practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS
Johansen, S. (1988) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 · Cited by 17,027
Powell, M. J. D. (1964) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 · Cited by 4,632
Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference
Chatfield, C. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983440 · Cited by 1,103
The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations
Haavelmo, T. (1943) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1905714 · Cited by 966
Cited by
Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots
Campbell, J. Y., & Perron, P. (1991) · NBER Macroeconomics Annual · doi:10.1086/654163 · Cited by 1,255
Hendry, D. F. (1995) · doi:10.1093/0198283164.001.0001 · Cited by 1,148
Self-citationEconomic development, legality, and the transplant effect
Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K., & Richard, J.-F. (2003) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00196-9 · Cited by 928
Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models
Anselin, L., & Rey, S. (1991) · Geographical Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00228.x · Cited by 781
“Positive” results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
Fanelli, D. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010068 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendry, D. F.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2000-10-26
- OpenAlex
- W2131510716
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Econometrics: Alchemy or Science?: Essays in Econometric Methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0198293542.001.0001
- The paper
- Hendry, D. F. (2000). Econometrics: Alchemy or Science?: Essays in Econometric Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293542.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.