The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Justice, Posterity, and the Environment
Abstract
In rich countries, environmental problems are seen as problems of prosperity. In poor countries, they are seen as problems of poverty. This is because the environmental problems in poor countries—such as lack of clean drinking water or decent sanitation—are problems that affect them here and now, whereas in rich countries the environmental problems that people worry about most—largely as a result of current prosperity and economic growth—are those that seem likely to harm mainly posterity and hence violate our obligations to future generations. But what exactly are our obligations to future generations? Are they determined by some sort of ethical system, such as the ‘rights’ of future generations, or justice between generations, or intergenerational equity, or sustainable development? The first part of this book is addressed to these questions. It is argued that while ethical ‘systems’ do not provide much help, we still have moral obligations to take account of the interests that future generations will have. But an appraisal of these interests in the light of probable future developments suggests that, while environmental problems have to be taken seriously, our main obligation to future generations is to bequeath to them a more decent society in which there is greater respect for basic human rights than is the case today throughout most of the world. Furthermore, it cannot serve the interests of justice if the burden of protecting the environment for the benefit of posterity is born mainly by poorer people today. More resources devoted to the environment means fewer are devoted competing claims for, say, health care or education or housing, not to mention plain private consumption. And in poor countries millions of people suffer from acute lack of sanitation, clean drinking water, shelter, and basic infrastructures to prevent or cure widespread disease. Neither generations nor nations are homogeneous entities. The later chapters of this book, therefore, are addressed to the ethical aspects of the way that resources ought to be shared out between environmental protection and competing uses in all countries, and how the burden of dealing with global environmental problems ought to be shared out between rich and poor nations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
On the measurement of inequality
Atkinson, A. B. (1970) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6 · Cited by 3,945
The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays
Frankfurt, H. G. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818172 · Cited by 2,634
(1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175005 · Cited by 2,183
Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-s · Cited by 1,941
Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.45 · Cited by 1,894
Simon, J. L. (2023) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.118538 · Cited by 1,652
Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning
O'Neill, O. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621239 · Cited by 1,349
A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics
Bergson, A. (1938) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1881737 · Cited by 1,211
Utilitarianism: For and Against
Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840852 · Cited by 1,174
Cited by
Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy
Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2015) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9266-1 · Cited by 411
The missing risks of climate change
Rising, J., Tedesco, M., Piontek, F., & Stainforth, D. A. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05243-6 · Cited by 310
Meyer, L. H., & Roser, D. (2009) · Intergenerational Justice · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282951.003.0009 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckerman, W., & Pasek, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2001-05-03
- OpenAlex
- W2164545994
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 28.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Justice, Posterity, and the Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199245088.001.0001
- The paper
- Beckerman, W., & Pasek, J. (2001). Justice, Posterity, and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199245088.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.