The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The European Voter: A Comparative Study Of Modern Democracies
Abstract
The purpose of this book is to describe and explain the changes in electoral behaviour that occurred in six West-European countries in the second half of the twentieth century. Two alternative theoretical approaches are systematically tested in an attempt to explain these changes. The first approach is deduced from modernisation theory. Modernisation theory implies that over time, the explanatory power for electoral behaviour of more or less stable structural variables such as social class and religion will yield to more short-term factors. The second and alternative theoretical approach predicts that changes and variations in patterns of voting behaviour are not due to secular processes in voting behaviour, but to variations in the political-institutional context, both between countries and within countries between different elections. In contrast to much of the authoritative literature, chapter after chapter of this book shows that there is little empirical evidence supporting modernization theory. Electoral behaviour is primarily political behaviour that is shaped by the political context of elections as much as by autonomous processes in society. In this respect, not much has changed during the period covered. The political context was never irrelevant for voting behaviour. No matter how divided a society is in terms of religion and/or social class, as long as these differences are not politicised, voters cannot be mobilised on this basis. Also, if voters do not see the policy differences between the political parties competing for their votes — as was increasingly the case in the second half of the 1980s and the 1990s in some of the countries in this study — one should not be surprised to find low correlations between voters’ policy preferences and their party choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,594
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
VERBA, S., SCHLOZMAN, K. L., & BRADY, H. E. (1995) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · Cited by 6,626
Elder, J. W., Geertz, C., & Rosenhack, K. P. S. (1964) · Cited by 3,878
Klecka, W. (1980) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983938 · Cited by 3,723
Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,590
The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics
Morse, E. L., & Inglehart, R. (1978) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20039864 · Cited by 3,566
Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study
Petrocik, J. R. (1996) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111797 · Cited by 2,902
Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Cross National Perspectives
Birnbaum, P., Lipset, S., & Rokkan, S. (1968) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3320570 · Cited by 2,801
Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x · Cited by 2,750
Cited by
Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective
Lupu, N. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9279-z · Cited by 312
What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research
Stockemer, D. (2017) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.30 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomassen, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2005-07-28
- OpenAlex
- W1547177775
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The European Voter: A Comparative Study Of Modern Democracies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199273219.001.0001
- The paper
- Thomassen, J. (2005). The European Voter: A Comparative Study Of Modern Democracies. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199273219.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.