The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory
Abstract
The humanity formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative demands that we treat humanity as an end in itself. Because this principle resonates with currently influential ideals of human rights and dignity, contemporary readers often find it compelling, even if the rest of Kant’s moral philosophy leaves them cold. Moreover, some prominent specialists in Kant’s ethics recently have turned to the humanity formulation as the most theoretically central and promising principle of Kant’s ethics. Nevertheless, despite the intuitive appeal and the increasingly recognized philosophical importance of the humanity formulation, it has received less attention than many other, less central, aspects of Kant’s ethics. This book is the most sustained and systematic examination yet of the humanity formulation. It argues that the ‘rational nature’ that must be treated as an end in itself is not a minimally rational nature consisting of the power to set ends or the unrealized capacity to act morally, but instead is the more properly rational nature possessed by someone who gives priority to moral principles over any contrary impulses. In other words, good will is the end in itself. This non-standard reading of the humanity formulation provides a firm theoretical foundation for deriving plausible approaches to particular moral issues. Contrary to first impressions, it does not impose moralistic demands to pass judgment on others’ character. This reading of the humanity formulation also enables progress on problems of interest to Kant scholars such as reconstructing Kant’s argument for accepting the humanity formulation as a basic moral principle, and allows for increased understanding of the relationship between Kant’s ethics and supposedly Kantian ideas such as ‘respect for autonomy’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024717 · Cited by 4,663
Korsgaard, C. M., & O'Neill, O. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511554476 · Cited by 4,013
(1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611964 · Cited by 2,202
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy
Dworkin, G. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625206 · Cited by 2,018
Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory
Rawls, J. (1980) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2025790 · Cited by 2,002
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174503 · Cited by 1,633
Wood, A. W. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173254 · Cited by 1,403
Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning
O'Neill, O. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621239 · Cited by 1,349
Allison, H. E. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172295 · Cited by 1,233
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View
Kant, I. (1974) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2018-3 · Cited by 1,210
Cited by
Parfit, D. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199572816.001.0001 · Cited by 216
Mental time-travel, semantic flexibility, and A.I. ethics
Arvan, M. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-018-0848-2 · Cited by 18
“Also see Nozick (1974), Cureton (2013), Dean (2006, 2013), Glasgow (2007), Nelson (2008), and Pallikkathayil (2010).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, R.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2006-05-11
- OpenAlex
- W618829496
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199285721.001.0001
- The paper
- Dean, R. (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199285721.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.