Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Abstract
What philosophers have lately come to accept as analysis of the concept of a person is not actually analysis of that concept at all. Strawson, whose usage represents the current standard, identifies the concept of a person as “the concept of a type of entity such that both predicates ascribing states of consciousness and predicates ascribing corporeal characteristics...are equally applicable to a single individual of that single type.”1 But there are many entities besides persons that have both mental and physical properties. As it happens—though it seems extraordinary that this should be so—there is no common English word for the type of entity Strawson has in mind, a type that includes not only human beings but animals of various lesser species as well. Still, this hardly justifies the misappropriation of a valuable philosophical term.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only humans have the desire to evaluate their own desires.
“some philosophers propose that only humans have the desire to evaluate their own desires,9 and a parsimonious read of the data suggests that this is indeed the case.10”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108 · Cited by 4,885 · see citing works
Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective
Blasi, A. (1983) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(83)90029-1 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands
Thompson, D. F. (1980) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1954312 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account
Santoni de Sio, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00015 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency
Martin, J. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Nguyen, C. T. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190052089.001.0001 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
The Significance of Self-control
Duckworth, A. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019725108 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Fragmented Selves: Temporality and Identity in Borderline Personality Disorder
Fuchs, T. (2007) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000106468 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Phenomenal transparency and cognitive self-reference
Metzinger, T. (2003) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1023/b:phen.0000007366.42918.eb · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Two virtue ethics and the anthropology of morality
Mattingly, C. (2012) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499612455284 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa
Tan, J., Hope, T., & Stewart, A. (2003) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.09.010 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Garland, E. L. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13034 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Formosa, P. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09579-2 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: a survey
Sotala, K., & Yampolskiy, R. V. (2015) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/1/018001 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Deigh, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750519 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
The Explanatory Component of Moral Responsibility
Björnsson, G., & Persson, K. (2012) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00813.x · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Constructing Client Agency in Psychotherapy Research
Mackrill, T. (2009) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022167808319726 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Halpern, J., Paolo, D., & Huang, A. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105226 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Agency, Teleological Control and Robust Causation
Usher, M. (2020) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12537 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Authenticity and psychiatric disorder: does autonomy of personal preferences matter
Sjöstrand, M., & Juth, N. (2014) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-013-9509-x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Köhler, S. (2020) · Science and engineering ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00259-5 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Stoics on World‐Conflagration and Everlasting Recurrence
Long, A. A. (2006) · From Epicurus to Epictetus · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279128.003.0013 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Untitled work
Li, C. (2014) · Philosophy East and West
- Authors
- Frankfurt, H. G.
- Corresponding author
- Frankfurt, Harry G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1971-01-14
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023856917
- Cited by
- 4,663
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 201 · 2025: 244 · 2024: 259 · 2023: 328 · 2022: 246 · 2021: 281 · 2020: 256 · 2019: 286 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 138 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 127 · 2013: 156 · 2012: 130
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- free will, Strawson, states of consciousness, personhood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review