Cited by 96Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Weight stigma as a predictor of distress and maladaptive eating behaviors during COVID-19: longitudinal findings from the EAT study

Open access
Puhl, Rebecca M, Lessard, Leah M, Larson, Nicole, Eisenberg, Marla E, Neumark-Stzainer, Dianne·2020·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weight stigma is common for people with obesity and harmful to health. Links between obesity and complications from COVID-19 have been identified, but it is unknown whether weight stigma poses adverse health implications during this pandemic. PURPOSE: We examined longitudinal associations between prepandemic experiences of weight stigma and eating behaviors, psychological distress, and physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic in a diverse sample of emerging adults. METHODS: Participants (N = 584, 64% female, mean age = 24.6 ± 2.0 years, mean body mass index [BMI] = 28.2) in the COVID-19 Eating and Activity over Time (C-EAT) study were cohort members of the population-based longitudinal study EAT 2010-2018. Weight stigma reported by participants in 2018 was examined as a predictor of binge eating, eating to cope, physical activity, depressive symptoms, and stress during COVID-19. Data were collected via online surveys during the U.S. outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020. RESULTS: Prepandemic experiences of weight stigma predicted higher levels of depressive symptoms (β = 0.15, p < .001), stress (β = 0.15, p = .001), eating as a coping strategy (β = 0.16, p < .001), and an increased likelihood of binge eating (odds ratio = 2.88, p < .001) among young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic but were unrelated to physical activity. Although associations remained after accounting for demographic characteristics and BMI, the magnitude of longitudinal associations was attenuated after adjusting for prior levels of the outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults who have experienced weight stigma may have increased vulnerability to distress and maladaptive eating during this pandemic. Public health messaging could be improved to support people of diverse body sizes and reduce the harmful consequences of weight stigma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kaaa077

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Puhl et al. (2020), no significant interactions based on gender were found.

    “Furthermore, no significant interactions based on gender were found.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Puhl et al. (2020)

  • In Puhl et al. (2020), pre-pandemic experiences of weight stigma predicted higher levels of stress, depressive symptoms, eating to cope with stress, and increased likelihood of binge eating during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “The comparison between the two samples (stigma perceived before COVID vs. stigma perceived during COVID) revealed that pre-pandemic experiences of weight stigma predicted higher levels of stress, depressive symptoms, eating to cope with stress, and an increased likelihood of binge eating, during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Puhl et al. (2020)

  • In Puhl et al. (2020) C-EAT survey, the majority of the overall sample reported that COVID-19 negatively affected mood and anxiety levels, raised stress, and exacerbated problems with food intake.

    “In agreement with the original assumption, majority of the overall sample reported that COVID-19 negatively affected mood and anxiety levels, raising stress, and exacerbating problems with food intake.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Puhl et al. (2020)

  • Uncertainty and anxiety due to the pandemic contributed to an increase in subjective discomfort and raised the risk of compulsory eating as a strategy to cope with stress.

    “We found that uncertainty and anxiety due to pandemic contributed to an increase in subjective discomfort and raised the risk of compulsory eating as a strategy to cope with stress (Flaudias et al., 2020; Puhl et al., 2020).”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Puhl et al., 2020

  • The Puhl et al. (2020) study was on secondary school students enrolled in a 10-year longitudinal cohort study, with a mean age of 24 years in pandemic.

    “The study by Puhl et al. (2020) was on secondary school students, enrolled in a 10-year longitudinal cohort study, with a mean age of 24 years in pandemic (Puhl et al., 2020).”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Puhl et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]Yanovski SZ Questionnaire on eating and weight patterns–revised (QEWP-R). Obes Res. 1993; 1: 319– 324.
  2. [53]Watanabe PI, Fontana FE, Silva MPD, Mazzardo O, Bacil EDA, Campos W Association between weight-teasing and physical activity in adolescents. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017; 35: 309– 315. 28977290 PMC5606173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puhl, R. M., Lessard, L. M., Larson, N., Eisenberg, M. E., & Neumark-Stzainer, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Puhl, Rebecca M
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
738-746
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W3085050840
Cited by
96
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
28.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R35HL139853)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight stigma, COVID-19 pandemic, binge eating, depressive symptoms, stress, physical activity, young adults, obesity, maladaptive eating behaviors, body size diversity
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Obesity, Pneumonia, Viral, Exercise, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review