Cited by 40Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchPhysical Activity and Health

The Effects of Exercise on Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Cancer Caregivers: Results from the RECHARGE Randomized Controlled Trial

Cuthbert, Colleen A, King-Shier, Kathryn M, Ruether, J Dean, Tapp, Dianne M, Wytsma-Fisher, Kathryn, Fung, Tak S, Culos-Reed, S Nicole·2018·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background Family caregivers to cancer patients are at risk for physical and psychological morbidity as a direct result of being in the caregiver role. Exercise as an intervention to support caregiver health and well-being has been tested in other caregiver populations; however, no randomized controlled trials testing the effects of an aerobic and resistance training program have been conducted where cancer caregivers only have participated. Purpose To examine the effects of a 12-week exercise program on quality of life (Short Form 36 v2), psychological outcomes, physical activity levels, and physical fitness in caregivers to cancer patients. Methods Seventy-seven caregivers were randomized to either an exercise intervention or wait-list control. Two participants in the exercise arm dropped out immediately after their baseline assessment. Outcome data for n = 77 participants were analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis with linear mixed models. Results Significant group by time interaction effects were detected for exercise on the mental health component score of quality of life, self-reported weekly exercise levels, and the six-minute walk test. Small to medium effect sizes were detected on several outcomes including physical health component of quality of life (d = 0.36), mental health component of quality of life (d = 0.74), depression (d = 0.41), anxiety (d = 0.35), physical activity levels (d = 0.80), and the six-minute walk test (d = 0.21). Conclusions The findings s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kax040

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 15 studies described caregivers as mostly spouses or daughters/sons of patients with cancer, usually sharing the same home.

    “As for family bonds, 15 studies described these caregivers as being mostly spouses or daughters/sons of the patients with cancer, usually sharing the same home [22,23,25,26,27,28,30,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].”
  • 26 studies alluded to emotional and psychological problems suffered by caregivers, highlighting anxiety, depression, feelings of grief and distress, and high levels of stress.

    “At an emotional level, 26 studies [22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,33,34,35,36,38,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52] alluded to the emotional and psychological problems suffered by caregivers, highlighting anxiety, depression, feelings of grief and distress, and high levels of stress.”
  • Eight studies described that care work implies a greater risk for caregivers of suffering physical morbidity with considerable wear, which increases as care burden continues over time.

    “In relation to physical problems, eight studies [25,34,37,40,41,42,43,44] described that care work implies a greater risk for caregivers of suffering physical morbidity with considerable wear, which in fact increases as the care burden continues over time.”
  • Most caregivers of adults with cancer are between 45 and 65 years old (around 50).

    “most of the studies set the interval between ages 45–65 [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,40,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,54,55,56].”
  • Care provision by caregivers of adults with cancer causes physical problems, and the risk of physical morbidity increases the longer care activity continues.

    “Different review studies have revealed that care provision on the part of caregivers causes physical problems, increasing the risk of suffering physical morbidity the longer the care activity continues [25,34,37,40,41,42,43,44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuthbert, C. A., King-Shier, K. M., Ruether, J. D., Tapp, D. M., Wytsma-Fisher, K., Fung, T. S., & Culos-Reed, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Cuthbert, Colleen A
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2018-01-25
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
645-661
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2792381007
Cited by
40
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
cancer caregivers, exercise intervention, concurrent training, quality of life, depression, anxiety, physical activity, physical fitness, 6-minute walk test, caregiver well-being, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life, Exercise, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review