The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Responses to Asbestos: Induction of Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis Through Modulation of Redox-Dependent Cell Signaling Pathways
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Asbestos multiplicatively increases the risk of cancer when a person is exposed to tobacco smoke, but its effect is also confirmed independently of this factor6–8.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reactive Oxygen Species a Double-Edged Sword for Mesothelioma
Benedetti, S., Nuvoli, B., Catalani, S., & Galati, R. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4253 · Cited by 97
Obmiński, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37257-z · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Heintz, N. H., & Mossman, B. T.
- ORCID
- Mossman, Brooke T.
- Venue
- Asbestos and Its Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-04-17
- Pages
- 120-138
- OpenAlex
- W2479605037
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
- Keywords
- asbestos, cell proliferation, apoptosis, redox signaling, oxidative stress, signaling pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review