The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Managing Monks
Abstract
The paradigmatic Buddhist is the monk. It is well known that ideally Buddhist monks are expected to meditate and study—to engage in religious practice. The institutional structure which makes this concentration on spiritual cultivation possible is the monastery. But as a bureaucratic institution, the monastery requires administrators to organize and manage its functions, to prepare quiet spots for meditation, to arrange audiences for sermons, or simply to make sure food, rooms, and bedding are provided. The valuations placed on such organizational roles were, however, a subject of considerable controversy among Indian Buddhist writers, with some considering them significantly less praiseworthy than meditative concentration or teaching and study, while others more highly appreciated their importance. This study of the administrative offices of Indian Buddhist monasticism and of those who hold them, explores literary sources, inscriptions, and other materials in Sanskrit, Pali, Tibetan, and Chinese in order to explore this tension and paint a picture of the internal workings of the Buddhist monastic institution in India, highlighting the ambivalent and sometimes contradictory attitudes toward administrators revealed in various sources.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information in scholastic materials was transferred into Buddhist encyclopaedic and historical works.
“The information in scholastic materials was, moreover, transferred into Buddhist encyclopaedic and historical works. 47”
From A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought (2018) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slaves ( nubi 奴婢) in Daoxuan’s Vinaya writings
Pu, C. (2016) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2016.1153291 · Cited by 1
What about Rats? Buddhist Disciplinary Guidelines on Rats: Daoxuan’s Vinaya Commentaries
Heirman, A. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12070508 · Cited by 1
A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought
Barrett, T. H. (2018) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776
Metadata
- Authors
- Silk, J. A.
- Corresponding author
- Silk, Jonathan A.
- ORCID
- Silk, Jonathan A.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-10-15
- OpenAlex
- W4250855514
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Keywords
- Buddhist monasticism, Buddhist monks, monastic administration, Indian Buddhism, Buddhist institutions, monastic organization, Buddhist scriptures, inscriptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review