The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking with Sketches
Abstract
Sketches serve to externalize ideas, render fleeting ideas permanent, confer coherence on scattered concepts, and turn internal thoughts public. They can be created and recreated, examined and re-examined, configured and reconfigured, considered and reconsidered, for clarity and for creativity. The schematic vocabulary of sketches allows both expression and discovery of ideas. Sketching is integral to design, where vagueness encourages reinterpretation and discourages fixation. Using sketches to those ends requires constructive perception, a combination of a perceptual skill of reconfiguring and a cognitive skill of finding remote associations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spatial reasoning is fundamental to all intellectual processes.
“Spatial reasoning is fundamental to all intellectual processes [1].”
From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2000) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00034-4 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Creating visual explanations improves learning
Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6 · Cited by 298
Self-citationDimensions of integration in embedded and extended cognitive systems
Heersmink, R. (2015) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1 · Cited by 191
RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics
Yuan, W., Duan, J., Blukis, V., Pumacay, W., Krishna, R., Murali, A., Mousavian, A., & Fox, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10721 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Tversky, B., & Suwa, M.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Chukyo University (JP)
- Venue
- Tools for Innovation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-11-01
- Pages
- 75-84
- OpenAlex
- W2406512702
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 33.89
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- sketching, design thinking, remote associations, cognitive flexibility, creativity, vagueness, idea exploration, reconfiguration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
