The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Looking Down on Human Intelligence
Abstract
Human mental ability differences have a hierarchical structure, and may be viewed at levels from general ability (g) to specific abilities. Ability differences show moderate stability across the lifespan, moderate heritability, and some predictive power in the fields of education, work, and social life. The most persistent mystery is the origin(s) of individual differences in cognitive and biological processes. The book reviews the search for these origins. The chapters cover historical work from antiquity to the 20th century. Research addresses the search for the origins of mental ability differences in cognitive components, reaction times, and inspection times. Biological areas such as brain size, event-related potentials, functional brain imaging, and molecular genetics are presented. The book identifies solid findings and sites of progress and criticizes empirical and conceptual weaknesses in the field.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A century of research strongly supports all five.”
From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Deary, 2000
In the citing paper
“that within -group variability in phenotypic g has strong genetic roots and many physiological correlates in the brain”
From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Deary, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has provided a vast, interlocking network of evidence that g is the backbone of all broad mental abilities in all age, race, sex, and national groups studied to date”
From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Deary, 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence
Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1014 · Cited by 1,080
The neuroscience of human intelligence differences
Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2793 · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationWorking Memory and Intelligence: The Same or Different Constructs?
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 · Cited by 969
Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings
Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.105 · Cited by 702
Self-citationGottfredson, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Deary, I.
- Corresponding author
- Deary, Ian
- ORCID
- Deary, Ian
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000-09-21
- OpenAlex
- W4302084454
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- individual differences in intelligence, heritability of intelligence, reaction time, inspection time, brain size, event-related potentials, functional neuroimaging, cognitive ability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review