Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 105Law, Rights, and FreedomsCriminal Law and EvidenceLegal Rights and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unpopular PrivacyWhat Must We Hide?

Allen, Anita·2011·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Can the government stick us with privacy we don't want? It can it does, and according to this author, may need to do more of it. Privacy is a foundational good, she argues, a necessary tool in the liberty-lover's kit for a successful life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195141375.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Allen, A.
Corresponding author
Allen, Anita
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2011-11-01
OpenAlex
W410020276
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Keywords
privacy, government surveillance, civil liberties, individual liberty, personal data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.