Cited by 403Legal Education and Practice InnovationsLegal Language and InterpretationLinguistics and Education Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 298 of the 301 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Language of Law School: Learning to "Think Like a Lawyer"

Abstract

Anyone who has attended law school knows that it invokes an important intellectual transformation, frequently referred to as “learning to think like a lawyer”. This process, which forces students to think and talk in radically new and toward different ways about conflicts, is directed by professors in the course of their lectures and examinations, and conducted via spoken and written language. This book delves into that legal language to reveal the complexities of how this process takes place. The book bases its linguistic study on tape recordings from first year Contracts courses in eight different law schools. The book discusses how these schools employ the Socratic method between teacher and student, forcing the student to shift away from moral and emotional terms in thinking about conflict, toward frameworks of legal authority instead. This move away from moral frameworks is key, the book says, arguing that it represents an underlying world view at the core not just of law education, but for better or worse, of the entire U.S. legal system—which, while providing a useful source of legitimacy and a means to process conflict, fails to deal systematically with aspects of fairness and social justice. The latter part of the study shows how differences in race and gender makeup among law students and professors can subtly alter this process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183108.001.0001

Cites

298 of 298 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 301 references

Research works printed but not linked: 212

  1. 1989, American Lawyers
  2. 1995, The Law & Society Reader
  3. 1988, Lawyers in Society
  4. 1994, The Lying Woman, the Devious Prostitute, and Other Stories from the Evidence Casebook., Northwestern University Law Review
  5. 1991, Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America: A Call to Action
  6. 1995, Unfinished Business
  7. 1998, Elusive Equality: The Experiences of Women in Legal Education
  8. 1979, Report and Recommendations: The Role of Law Schools
  9. 1994, A Review of Legal Education in the United States
  10. 1992, Narrowing the Gap: Legal Education and Professional Development—An Educational Continuum
  11. 2000, Minding the Law
  12. 1988, What It’s Like to Be Part of a Perpetual First Wave or the Case of the Disappearing Woman., Temple Law Review
  13. 1986, Teachers and Texts
  14. 1996, The Socratic Method., Harvard Law Review
  15. 1935, The Symbols of Government
  16. 1979, Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings
  17. 1976, Unequal Justice
  18. 1962, How to Do Things with Words
  19. 2000, Language Acculturation Practices and Resistance to In‘doctrine’ation in the Legal Skills Curriculum and Beyond: A Commentary on Mertz’s Critical Anthropology of the Socratic, Doctrinal Classroom., John Marshall Law Review
  20. 1981, The Dialogic Imagination
  21. 1988, Gender Bias in the Classroom., Journal of Legal Education
  22. 1990, Gender Bias in the Classroom (2)., Southern Illinois Law Journal
  23. 1982, In Cross-Cultural Studies in Alaskan Education
  24. Method to the Socratic Madness of Law Schools?
  25. 1970, Black Students in White Law Schools: The Ordeal and the Opportunity., Toledo Law Review
  26. 1986, The Role of Legal Education in Producing Psychological Distress among Law Students., American Bar Foundation Research Journal
  27. 1983, Law Dictionary
  28. 1957, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv
  29. 1984, Distinction
  30. 1988, Homo Academicus
  31. 1977, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture
  32. 2000, Women at the University of Texas Law School: A Call for Action., Texas Journal of Women & Law
  33. 1996, In The Matrix of Culture: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology
  34. 1996, Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict, and the Social Construction of Inequality
  35. 1996, In Disorderly Discourse
  36. 1997, Notes on a Confession: On the Construction of Gender, Sexuality, and Violence in an Infanticide Case., Pragmatics
  37. 1972, Sociolinguistics
  38. 2001, A Theory of the Trial
  39. 1973, Opportunities for Women in Higher Education: Their Current Participation, Prospects for the Future, and Recommendations for Action
  40. Educating Lawyers
  41. 2005, The Real Impact of Eliminating Affirmative Action in American Law Schools: An Empirical Critique of Richard Sander’s Study., Stanford Law Review
  42. 1997, The Problem of Purity: A Study in the Early Thought of W. E. B. DuBois.
  43. 1986, The Social Construction of Literacy
  44. 1986, The Social Construction of Literacy
  45. 2004, ‘How Bad Is It Out There?’ Teaching and Learning about the State of North Carolina’s Legal Profession., North Carolina Law Review
  46. Power Is as Power Does: A Reply to Travers., Law & Social Inquiry
  47. 1990, Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse
  48. 1986, The Social Construction of Literacy
  49. 1998, The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties
  50. 1990, Student-Faculty Interaction in the College Classroom., Journal of Research & Development in Education
  51. 1992, Justice Accused
  52. 1982, The Current State of the Law School Curriculum., Journal of Legal Education
  53. 1989, Foreword: Toward a Race-Conscious Pedagogy in Legal Education., National Black Law Journal
  54. 1995, Women in the Law: A Look at the Numbers
  55. 1951, Inadequate Law School Training: A Plan to Give Students Actual Practice., American Bar Association Journal
  56. 1977, The Socratic Method: More Harm Than Good?, Journal of Contemporary Law
  57. 2005, The Big Muddy., Stanford Law Review
  58. 1991, Contextual Legal Criticism: A Demonstration Exploring Hierarchy., New York University Law Review
  59. 1992, Law and Lawyering: Legal Studies with an Interdisciplinary Focus., New York Law School Law Review
  60. 2006, The Case for More and Better Empirical Research in Law Schools.
  61. 2003, Diversity Matters: Race, Gender, and Ethnicity in Legal Education., Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy
  62. 1986, Law’s Empire
  63. 1989, Gender, Ethnicity, and Grades: Evidence of Discrimination in Law Firm Interviews., Law & Inequality
  64. 1977, Identity and Structure
  65. 2005, Foreword: Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?, Wisconsin Law Review
  66. 1974, Escape from the Doll’s House
  67. 1991, The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform
  68. 1995, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies
  69. 1986, Inside Doctoring
  70. 1993, School Engagement and Students at Risk
  71. 1991, The Fate of Law
  72. 1984, Blacks in College
  73. 1949, A Disturbing Look at the Law Schools., Journal of Legal Education
  74. 1963, Law and the Modern Mind
  75. 1973, A History of American Law
  76. 1985, Re-Reading Contracts: A Feminist Analysis of a Contracts Casebook., American University Law Review
  77. 1995, The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference., Social Research
  78. 1998, Becoming Lawyers: The Role of the Socratic Method in Modern Law Schools., Green Bag 2d
  79. 1964, A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style
  80. 1983, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology
  81. 1983, Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education., Harvard Educational Review
  82. 1981, Forms of Talk
  83. 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
  84. Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global Perspectives
  85. 1968, Literacy in Traditional Society
  86. 1959, Toward a More Effective Program in the Small Law School., Journal of Legal Education
  87. 1988, Kingsfield and Kennedy: Reappraising the Male Model of Law School Teaching., Journal of Legal Education
  88. 1983, Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms
  89. 1992, Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse
  90. 2000, Making Culture Visible: Comments on Elizabeth Mertz’s ‘Teaching Lawyers the Language of Law: Legal and Anthropological Translations., John Marshall Law Review
  91. 1998, Pronouncing and Persevering: Gender and the Discourses of Disputing in an African Islamic Court
  92. The African-American Lawyer: A Demographic Profile., National Bar Association Magazine
  93. 1972, Women in Law School: Structural Constraint and Personal Choice in the Formation of Personal Identity., Journal of Legal Education
  94. 1999, Becoming Cosmetologists: Language Socialization and Identity in an African-American Beauty College
  95. 1960, Style in Language
  96. 1995, On Language
  97. 1971, Selected Writings
  98. 1991, The Influence of Legal Education on Moral Reasoning., Minnesota Law Review
  99. 1995, To Hell with Langdell, Law & Social Inquiry
  100. 1983, Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy
  101. 1931, The Case System: A Defense., Notre Dame Law Review
  102. 1985, Women and Men in the Classroom: Inequality and Its Remedies., On Teaching and Learning: Journal of the Harvard-Danforth Center
  103. 2004, A Companion to LinguisticAnthropology
  104. 1972, Sociolinguistic Patterns
  105. 1927, Anent the Case Method of Studying Law., New York University Law Review
  106. 1871, Cases on the Law of Contracts
  107. 1993, Imagine Her Satisfaction’: The Transformative Task of Feminist Tort Work., Washburn Law Journal
  108. 2006, The Vanishing Complainant
  109. 1976, The Anthropological Study of Education
  110. The ‘Socratic Method’: The Scandal of American Education., The Leiter Reports
  111. 1983, Pragmatics
  112. 1948, The Current Crisis in Legal Education., Journal of Legal Education
  113. 1968, Concentrating on a Single Jurisdiction to Teach Criminal Law: An Experiment., Journal of Legal Education
  114. 1954, The Newcomer and the Case Method., Journal of Legal Education
  115. 2003, Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis
  116. 1985, Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives
  117. 2003, Contracts: Law in Action
  118. 1978, Contracts: Exchange Transactions and Relations
  119. 1994, Clinical Education as a Bridge between Law School and Practice: Mitigating the Misery., Clinical Law Review
  120. 1986, Research on the Legal Profession
  121. 1993, Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom
  122. 1990, The Career Paths of Minnesota Law Graduates: Does Gender Make a Difference?, Law & Inequality
  123. 2002, Producing Lawyers: Institutional Hierarchy and the Social Structure of Law Schools.
  124. Alliance for Women Battles Law School Gender Bias., Chicago Bar Association Record
  125. 1996, Natural Histories of Discourse
  126. 1979, Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom
  127. 1994, What’s Missing from the MacCrate Report: Of Skills, Legal Science, and Being a Human Being., Washington Law Review
  128. 1992, The Double Minority: Empirical Evidence of a Double Standard in Law School Hiring of Minority Women., Southern California Law Review
  129. 1990, Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans
  130. 1985, Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives
  131. 1996, Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict, and the Social Construction of Inequality
  132. 1982, Working Papers in Sociolinguistics
  133. 1994, Legal Loci and Places in the Heart., Law & Society Review
  134. 1982, No Burden to Carry’: Cape Breton Pragmatics and Metapragmatics.
  135. 1987, Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies
  136. 1996, Natural Histories of Discourse
  137. 2000, Teaching Lawyers the Language of Law: Legal and Anthropological Translations., John Marshall Law Review
  138. 1985, Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives
  139. 1985, Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives
  140. 1986, The Social Construction of Literacy
  141. 1984, Coherence in Written and Spoken Discourse
  142. 1990, Making All the Difference
  143. 1986, Social Facts and Fabrications: Customary Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980
  144. 1952, The Case Method., Journal of Legal Education
  145. Morris, Robert. “Not Thinking Like a Non-Lawyer: Implications of ‘Recognization’ for Legal Education and Intellectual Due Process.” Paper presented at Knowledge & Discourse: Speculating on Disciplinary Futures, 2nd International Conference, Hong Kong, June 2002. Web Proceedings, ed. C. Barron, P. Benson, and N. Bruce, July 2003, available at http://ec.hku.hk/kd2proc/default.asp.
  146. 1994, The Burdens of Both, the Privileges of Neither
  147. 1980, No Access to Law: Alternatives to the American Judicial System
  148. 1976, Persons and Masks of the Law
  149. 1975, Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Societies
  150. 1993, Reflexive Language
  151. 1951, The Case Method in American Legal Education., Journal of Legal Education
  152. 1991, A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decisionmaking: The Story Model., Cardozo Law Review
  153. 1998, Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control
  154. 1982, The Invisible Culture: Communication in Classroom and Community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation
  155. 1988, Doing the Ethnography of Schooling: Educational Anthropology in Action
  156. 1994, Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance
  157. 1995, Gender Trials
  158. 1989, The Harvard First-Year Experiment., Journal of Legal Education
  159. 1995, The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, First Year Law Students, and Performance., Cumberland Law Review
  160. 1995, Teaching Law to Passive Learners: The Contemporary Dilemma of Legal Education., Cumberland Law Review
  161. 2000, The Network Inside Out
  162. 1986, A Curriculum Course Designed for Lowering the Attrition Rate for the Disadvantaged Student., Howard Law Journal
  163. 1935, Law and the Lawyers
  164. 1975, The Legal Education of Chicano Students: Mutual Accommodation and Cultural Conflict., New Mexico Law Review
  165. 2005, A Reply to Critics., Stanford Law Review
  166. 2004, A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools., Stanford Law Review
  167. 2001, When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition
  168. 1993, Law in Everyday Life
  169. 1974, The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change
  170. 1990, The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children
  171. 1986, Language Socialization across Cultures
  172. 1998, Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory
  173. 2001, Walt Was Right., Journal of Legal Education
  174. 2003, A Shifting Gender Divide: The Impact of Gender on Education at Columbia Law School in the New Millenium., Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems
  175. 1985, Semiotic Mediation: So-ciocultural and Psychological Perspectives
  176. 1985, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance
  177. How Nursery Schools Teach Girls to Shut Up., Psychology Today
  178. 1984, Moral Implications and Effects of Legal Education., Journal of Legal Education
  179. 1985, Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives
  180. 1979, The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels
  181. 1981, The Limits of Awareness., Working Papers in Sociolinguistics
  182. 1987, Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies
  183. 2005, The Poetics of Politics: ‘Theirs’ and ‘Ours., Journal of Anthropological Research
  184. 1996, Natural Histories of Discourse
  185. 1976, Meaning in Anthropology
  186. 1998, Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory
  187. 1996, Natural Histories of Discourse
  188. 1979, Cognitive Styles in Law School
  189. 1996, Mend It, Bend It, Extend It: The Fate of Traditional Law School Methodology in the 21st Century., Loyola University-Chicago Law Journal
  190. 1995, The Dialogic Emergence of Culture
  191. 1986, Research on American Law Teaching: Is There a Case against the Case System?, Journal of Legal Education
  192. 1958, The Uses of Argument
  193. 1977, One L
  194. 1976, Law in Modern Society
  195. 1960, The Rites of Passage
  196. 1971, The Lack of Practical Training in Law Schools., Case Western Reserve Law Review
  197. 1988, Class, Race, and Gender in American Education
  198. 1985, Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind
  199. 2000, From Expectation to Experience: Essays on Law and Legal Education
  200. 1990, Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism

200 of 212 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Mertz, E.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Mertz, Elizabeth
Published
2007-02-22
OpenAlex
W2493949934
Cited by
403
References
301
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
16.91
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Language and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
Keywords
legal language, law schools, legal education, Socratic method, moral reasoning, legal authority, fairness, social justice, race, gender, law professors, law students, conflict resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review