Cited by 18LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health Disparities Affecting Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States: An Introduction

Abstract

This chapter places health disparities affecting gay and bisexual men within the context of health disparities experienced by other socially marginalized groups in the United States. It defines the population of gay and bisexual men and examines key differences between these men and other socially marginalized groups, including the basis of minority status, intergenerational influences, acquisition of minority status later in life, selective disclosure of minority status, and historical differences. The chapter describes key factors affecting health disparities among gay and bisexual men including socioeconomic status, prejudice and discrimination, laws and policies affecting health, health behavior, and access to health care, and individual behavior and cultural norms in the gay community. The chapter ends by briefly discussing public health efforts to address health disparities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301533.003.0001

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. US, 2006, Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (CPS/HVS): Annual Statistics: 2005
  2. Institute, 2002, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care
  3. Raphael, 2003, A society in decline: the political, economic, and social determinants of health inequalities in the United States.
  4. National, 2006, Health, United States, 2006
  5. Safford, 2001, Building the pillars of diversity in the U.S. health system., Clin Res Regulatory Affairs.
  6. Diaz, 2001, Social Discrimination and Health: The Case of Latino Gay Men and HIV Risk
  7. Solarz, 1999, Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future
  8. Herek, 2000, Homosexuality.
  9. Beeker, 1998, Influences on sexual risk behavior in young African-American men who have sex with men., J Gay Lesbain Med Assoc.
  10. Pilkington, 1995, Victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in community settings., J Community Psychol., 10.1002/1520-6629(199501)23:1〈34::AID-JCOP2290230105〉3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  11. Centers, 2006, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report
  12. Ryan, 1971, Blaming the Victim
  13. Sell, 2000, Elimination of Health Disparities Based on Sexual Orientation: Inclusion of Sexual Orientation as a Demographic Variable in Healthy People 2010 Objectives

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Wolitski, R. J., Valdiserri, R. O., & Stall, R. D.
Venue
Unequal Opportunity
Published
2007-12-06
Pages
3-32
OpenAlex
W2501021128
Cited by
18
References
131
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
health disparities, gay men, bisexual men, sexual minority health, social marginalization, minority status, intergenerational influence, selective disclosure, prejudice and discrimination, health policy, health behavior, health care access, public health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review