Cited by 681Health disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Are racial disparities in health conditional on socioeconomic status?

Farmer, Melissa M., Ferraro, Kenneth F.·2005·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Racial health inequality is related to socioeconomic status (SES), but debate ensues on the nature of the relationship. Using the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I and the subsequent follow-up interviews, this research examines health disparities between white and black adults and whether the SES/health gradient differs across the two groups in the USA. Two competing mechanisms for the conditional or interactive relationship between race and SES on health are examined during a 20-year period for black and white Americans. Results show that black adults began the study with more serious illnesses and poorer self-rated health than white adults and that the disparity continued over the 20 years. Significant interactions were found between race and education as well as race and employment status on health outcomes. The interaction effect of race and education showed that the racial disparity in self-rated health was largest at the higher levels of SES, providing some evidence for the "diminishing returns" hypothesis; as education levels increased, black adults did not have the same improvement in self-rated health as white adults. Overall, the findings provide evidence for the continuing significance of both race and SES in determining health status over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.026

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farmer, M. M., & Ferraro, K. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Farmer, Melissa M.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
191-204
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049813862
Cited by
681
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Purdue Research Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-11705, R01AG011705)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
racial disparities in health, socioeconomic status, self-rated health, educational attainment, employment status, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Disabled Persons, Persons with Disabilities, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Sick Role, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review