The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enlightenment in Dispute: The Reinvention of Chan Buddhism in Seventeenth-Century China
Abstract
This book studies the revival of Chan Buddhism in seventeenth‐century China. Focusing on a series of controversies, this book argues that the Chan revival was a systematic reinvention of Chan ideals of the past. The revival not only reshaped Chinese Buddhism but also greatly influenced Buddhism throughout East Asia. The first controversy is the debate between Miyun Yuanwu and his dharma heir, Hanyue Fazang, in the late Ming (1550–1644) and the Yongzheng emperor's intervention in 1733. The second controversy concerns Miyun Yuanwu's dharma heir Feiyin Tongrong's Chan genealogy that rearranged conventional accepted dharma transmission lines based on dubious inscriptions and thus provoked a notorious lawsuit in 1654. At the end of this book, this book offers an explanation about the rise and fall of Chan Buddhism by examining the role of textual practice and the implications of dharma transmission in rebuilding Chan institutions. By tracing the legacies of 17th‐century Chan Buddhism in modern Chinese Buddhism and placing Chan in larger historical context, this book explores a general pattern of Buddhist revival in the history of Chinese Buddhism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we learn that Hongren was quiet and withdrawn, and stayed silent when he was insulted; he spent his days in menial work with the servants and then spent his nights in meditation, and, best of all, “Although he never looked at the Buddhist scriptures, he understood everything he heard.”49”
From Early Chan Buddhism: A Meditation Movement or New Ways of Writing about Final Authority in Tang China? (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Where the Two Worlds Met: Spreading a Buddhist Canon in Wanli (1573–1620) China
ZHANG, D. (2016) · Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society · doi:10.1017/s1356186315000498 · Cited by 2
Cole, A. R. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel15040403 · Cited by 3
Zhang, D. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14040498 · Cited by 1
Buddhist Historiography: A Tale Of Deception in A Seminal Late Ming Buddhist Letter
Eichman, J. (2018) · Journal of Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/0737769x.2018.1507093 · Cited by 2
A Sinicised Religion Under Foreign Rule: Buddhism in the Jurchen Jin Dynasty (1115–1234)
Lin, H. (2019) · The Medieval History Journal · doi:10.1177/0971945818806991
Have a Korean Lineage and Transmit a Chinese One Too: Lineage Practices in Seon Buddhism
Ahn, J. Y. (2020) · Journal of Chan Buddhism · doi:10.1163/25897179-12340001
The White Lotus Movement and the Use of Chan
ter Haar, B. J. (2020) · Journal of Chan Buddhism · doi:10.1163/25897179-12340004
Untitled work
Luo, W. (2015) · Late Imperial China
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Jiang
- ORCID
- Wu, Jiang
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- OpenAlex
- W4241777800
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Zen Buddhism, Buddhist revival, 17th-century China, dharma transmission, Yongzheng Emperor, textual practices, Chinese Buddhism, East Asian Buddhism, modern Chinese Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review