The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rationality and the Reflective Mind
Abstract
This book attempts to resolve the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science—the debate about how much irrationality to ascribe to human cognition. It shows how the insights of dual-process theory and evolutionary psychology can be combined to explain why humans are sometimes irrational even though they possess remarkably adaptive cognitive machinery. The book argues that to characterize fully differences in rational thinking, we need to replace dual-process theories with tripartite models of cognition. Using a unique individual differences approach, it shows that the traditional second system (System 2) of dual-process theory must be further divided into the reflective mind and the algorithmic mind. Distinguishing them gives a better appreciation of the significant differences in their key functions: the key function of the reflective mind is to detect the need to interrupt autonomous processing and to begin simulation activities, whereas that of the algorithmic mind is to sustain the processing of decoupled secondary representations in cognitive simulation. The book then uses this algorithmic/reflective distinction to develop a taxonomy of cognitive errors made on tasks in the heuristics and biases literature. It presents the empirical data to show that the tendency to make these thinking errors is not highly related to intelligence. Using a tripartite model of cognition, the book shows how, when both are properly defined, rationality is a more encompassing construct than intelligence, and that IQ tests fail to assess individual differences in rational thought. It then goes on to discuss the types of thinking processes that would be measured if rational thinking were to be assessed as IQ has been.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,002
The Emerging Role of Intelligence in the World of the Future
Sternberg, R. J. (2018) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03897-263-1 · Cited by 1
Understanding Policy Attitudes: Effect of Affective Source Cues on Political Reasoning
Hrbková, L. (2016) · Masarykova univerzita eBooks · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m210-8056-2016 · Cited by 1
Design judgement processes in mature Swedish manufacturing companies
Andersson, T. (2020) · J of Design Research · doi:10.1504/jdr.2020.118668 · Cited by 1
Doxastic Involuntarism and ‘Ought to Believe’
Chrisman, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898852.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Quantum Uncertainty in Decision Theory
Yukalov, V. I. (2022) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98689-6_13 · Cited by 1
Consumer Decision Neuroscience
Gier, N. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-38206-3 · Cited by 1
Próchnicki, M., Janik, B., & Bystranowski, P. (2022) · Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11744-2_5 · Cited by 1
Ewolucja badań nad wynikami kontaktu językowego w czasie i przestrzeni: wybrane zagadnienia
Witalisz, A. (2021) · Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · doi:10.18778/8220-544-2.08 · Cited by 1
Environments for fast and slow thinking
Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.009 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAlemanni, B., & Lucarelli, C. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2365202 · Cited by 1
Intelligent escalation and the principle of relativityPreprint
Lescanne, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.07212 · Cited by 1
A Validation Study of the Orientation Model
Wilkinson, B. D. (2016) · Scholarship & Creative Works - Digital UNC a service of University Libraries (University of Northern Colorado) · Cited by 1
Kouklari, E.-C. (2017) · Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) · Cited by 1
Clinical Decision-Making by Acute Medicine Advanced Nurse Practitioners
Barnard, J. (2019) · Sheffield Hallam University · doi:10.7190/shu-thesis-00281 · Cited by 1
See the Change. Reflections on Wellbeing in the Context of Life-Philosophical LecturingPreprint
Vehkalahti, K., & Saarinen, E. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/gh4ue · Cited by 1
Francis, N. (2022) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226722000378 · Cited by 1
Predicting and Reflecting: A Dual Framework for Dual Process TheoryPreprint
Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ewnp5 · Cited by 1
Burden, S. (2014) · University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) · Cited by 1
Farrayre, A. (2019) · doi:10.70675/399a4c94zb77az4fc0zbd94z6833f35ad66b · Cited by 1
Sumadi, S., Susbiyani, A., & Maharani, A. (2026) · Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis · doi:10.70716/emis.v4i2.522
BRIKKER TIL EN EVOLUTIONÆR NEUROSOCIAL TEORI OM STRESS
Baldursson, E. B., Carlsen, P. W., & Pedersen, B. T. (2013) · Psyke & Logos · doi:10.7146/pl.v34i2.16627
Machine ethics via logic programming
Saptawijaya, A. (2015) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Myside Bias in Probabilistic Ethical Decision Making
Hohn, R. E. (2015) · JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University)
Premesse filosofiche per uno studio scientifico del pensiero riflessivo
Dennis, J. L., & Stella, A. (2014) · EPISTEMOLOGIA · doi:10.3280/epis2014-001008
End User Creativity: A Critical Realist Perspective
Baker, G. D. A., Cragg, P. B., Bartneck, C., & Seidel, S. (2013) · University of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.12021.58089
Beaulac, G. (2014) · Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Mindreading, representación, inferencia y argumentación
Yáñéz, C. S. (2015) · Co-herencia · doi:10.17230/co-herencia.12.23.7
Using Knowledge to Become Profoundly Effective
Beaudoin, L. P. (2015)
Beaudoin, L. P. (2015) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
Brusattin, L. (2012) · Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)
Mental Capacity of Adult Patients in Health Care
Hewitt, J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_28-1
Jackson, A. (2016)
An Integrated Model of “Free Will” and New Free Will Questionnaires
Young, G. C. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24094-7_19
The Road to Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis
Rudnianski, M., & Kravčík, M. (2013) · Advances in game-based learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4773-2.ch003
The Individual Realm of Machine Ethics: A Survey
Pereira, L. M., & Saptawijaya, A. (2016) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29354-7_2
Mental Activity and the Act of Learning in the Digital Age
DeDonno, M. A. (2015) · Advances in medical education, research, and ethics (AMERE) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9494-1.ch015 · Cited by 1
Significant Moral Facets Amenable to Logic Programming
Pereira, L. M., & Saptawijaya, A. (2016) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29354-7_3
Pedagogical-Didactic Training for an Inclusive Didactics
Maria, M. A., Cuzzocrea, F., Oliva, P., & Larcan, R. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6102-8.ch004
Recruitment Decision Making among International Schools Teachers
Kellett, S. (2015) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.5072/prism/27566
Foxall, G. R. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50121-9_7
Consumer Choice as Decision: Meso-Cognitive Psychology
Foxall, G. R. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50121-9_10
How Many Minds Do We Need? Toward A One-System Account of Human Reasoning
Mugg, J. (2015) · YorkSpace (York University)
Wpływ intuicji na proces podejmowania decyzji
Malewska, K. M. (2013) · Przedsiebiorczosc i Zarzadzanie
Beaudoin, L. P., Hyniewska, S., & Hudlická, E. (2017) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
Individual differences and basic logic ability
Runyon, C. (2012) · JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University)
Sutherland, S. L. (2016) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Dunn, T. L. (2017) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
ARCHITECTURAL THEORY AND THE USER'S MIND
JANKOWSKI, A., Furuya, N., & FUJII, Y. (2017) · Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) · doi:10.3130/aija.82.1591
Carlson, J. S., & Hunt, E. B. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-410388-7.00004-x
Letwin, C. R. (2015) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Watanuki, S., & Nagao, T. (2017) · Transactions of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering · doi:10.5057/jjske.tjske-d-17-00053
A Tale of Two Minds : Past, Present and Future
Amitani, Y. (2016) · Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.4288/jafpos.24.0_21
Luciano, S. F. M., & Rauen, F. J. (2017) · Revista do GEL · doi:10.21165/gel.v14i2.1517
A Naturalistic Proof of the Validity of the Authenticity Command
Steinvorth, U. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63871-3_9
Motivated Attention in the Multicultural Classroom
Sage, L. D. (2017) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-185-8_4
Cognitive debiasing in college environment
Makay, M. (2017) · Transylvanian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.24193/epsz.2017.2.3
What does agency afford the self?
Franks, B., & Voyer, B. G. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x17000681
Shattering the Beautiful Illusion: A Critical Review of Biocultural Creatures
Arceneaux, K. (2018) · Theory & Event · doi:10.1353/tae.2018.0025
RATIONALITY AND TYPE 1 PROCESSING
Stanovich, K. E. (2018) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.2.0231
Self-citationSuleman, S. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r31z4253v
ANÁLISE DE ESTILOS COGNITIVOS DE GESTORES APLICADOS A UM EMPREENDIMENTO DE ENGENHARIA
Maciel, P. R., Falce, J. L. L., Müylder, C. F. D., & Dias, A. T. (2018) · Anais do ... EGEPE · doi:10.17648/egepe-2018-83945
Neurocognitive mechanisms of Type 1 and Type 2 decision making processes
Williams, C. C. (2018) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)
Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs
Arceneaux, K. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18000274
Gao, J. (2016) · ERA
Ethics, Roles, and Confucianism
Provis, C. (2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1529-209620180000020002
de Guadalajara, U., & Maldonado, F. B. (2018) · Logos Revista de Lingüística Filosofía y Literatura · doi:10.15443/rl2823
Does deliberation really need more effort than intuition? A test using event-related brain potentialPreprint
Zeng, J., Tang, D.-L., Yu, J., Zhang, Q., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/628446
Emotional representations and their verbalization in preschool children
Galeeva, E., Zaytseva, O. Y., Галкина, И. А., & SHINKAREVA, N. A. (2019) · International Scientific Practical Conference "The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment" (ISMGE) · doi:10.2991/ismge-19.2019.39
Book Review: The Rationality Quotient—Toward a Test of Rational Thinking
Makay, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01889
Tricard, É., & Maintenant, C. (2019) · Advances in religious and cultural studies (ARCS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1811-3.ch003
Empirical research on XE: c.1967–1990
Frantz, R. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815289-8.00007-1
Compagnucci, M. C. (2019) · Perspectives in law, business and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0349-8_7
Steinvorth, U. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35036-9_2
“In Defeat, Defiance:” Churchill in Words (1935–1939) and in Deeds (1940)
Anders, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.009
Willingham, D. T., & Riener, C. R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316271988.006
Willingham, D. T., & Riener, C. R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316271988.007
MECANISMOS INTUITIVO E RACIONAL: VALIDAÇÃO DE ESCALA PARA TOMADA DE DECISÃO
Gomes, A. C. C., Mól, A. L. R., & Marques, M. C. (2019) · Revista de Administração FACES Journal · doi:10.21714/1984-6975faces2019v18n4art6845
The Irrationality of Public Consciousness
Ардашев, Р. Г. (2020) · Humanitarian Vector · doi:10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-2-76-84
Winning One as the Gipper?: Reagan’s Administration and American Engagement with the Soviet Union
Rathbun, B. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.011
Executive Functioning in Children with Chronic Pain
Jones, K. (2020) · doi:10.11575/prism/38000
The Three “R”s of International Relations: Realism, Romanticism, and Rationality
Rathbun, B. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.003
“Beginning the World All Over Again”: Resolving the Paradox of Ronald Reagan
Rathbun, B. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.010
Social Media Ethics Section 1: Facebook, Twitter, and Google – Oh My!
Parsons, T. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108553384.010
Debiasing and the Abortion Debate: An Analysis of Integrative Complexity
Bulger, R. (2020) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
Formal Metaeconomics: Recycling Choices
Lynne, G. D. (2020) · Palgrave advances in behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50601-8_4
Metaeconomics as Behavioral Economics and the Focus on Happiness
Lynne, G. D. (2020) · Palgrave advances in behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50601-8_5
The Lottery, the Preface, and Epistemic Rule Consequentialism
Kelp, C., & Praolini, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108379755.010
Willingham, D. T., & Riener, C. R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316271988.008
Neuroethics and the Future of Cyberpsychology
Parsons, T. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108553384.005
The Great Adaptive-Intelligence Test
Sternberg, R. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316650554.009
Steinvorth, U. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72603-4_2
An associative account of inferences: The development towards the prototype
Mazzone, M. (2021) · Rivista internazionale di filosofia e psicologia · doi:10.4453/rifp.2021.0001
“Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat”: Churchill, Romanticism, and the Rational Appeasement Debate
Rathbun, B. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.008
The “Prince” among Men: Bismarck’s Realpolitik in Prussian Politics
Rathbun, B. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.005
Cold Blood and Iron: Bismarck, the Struggle with Austria, and German Unification
Rathbun, B. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612937.006
Cyberpsychology, Aging, and Gerontechnology
Parsons, T. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108553384.007
Digital and Extended Selves in Cyberspace
Parsons, T. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108553384.004
Social Media Ethics Section 3: Digital Citizenship
Parsons, T. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108553384.012
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanovich, K.
- Corresponding author
- Stanovich, Keith
- ORCID
- Stanovich, Keith
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-12-03
- OpenAlex
- W654145152
- Cited by
- 1,041
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- rationality, dual-process theory, cognitive simulation, cognitive errors, heuristics and biases, individual differences, intelligence, intelligence testing, System 2, evolutionary psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review